Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 153 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here


Hot Links

American Antigravity

AESOP Institute

Closeminded Science



Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.




Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page


Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
Alternative Energy News
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
FringeEnergy News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy21 YT Channel
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine
Find Jobs

The Aethereal Nature of Electric Charge
Posted on Sunday, December 23, 2012 @ 16:14:41 GMT by vlad

Science FDT writes: People can identify with the concept of an elementary particle without knowing what it looks like up close. It is sufficient to know that it moves relative to other particles, and that the mutual acceleration is governed by certain established force laws. Few feel the need to enquire into the meaning of empty space or what a particle is actually made of. Is it spherical? Is it made of hard stuff? Is it shiny? Modern particle physics disregards these questions. If however we reverse the situation and argue that particles are sinks and sources in an all pervading aethereal medium which is dynamic, compressible, and stretchable, the focus then shifts to the question of what the aether itself is made of. Naturally we won't be able to answer that question any more than we can answer the question of what particles are made of in a world without aether. But we can demonstrate that such an aethereal approach to matter can be used to explain the electromagnetic field.

Once we can accept the concept of aether vortices without having to insist upon first knowing what the aether itself is made of, then the mystery of the electromagnetic field will unfold before our eyes.

Further details are found in "The Two Kinds of Electric Charge" at,


David Tombe



Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad

Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?

Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Very Good


 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly

"The Aethereal Nature of Electric Charge" | Login/Create an Account | 3 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: The Aethereal Nature of Electric Charge (Score: 1)
by Koen on Sunday, December 30, 2012 @ 11:02:29 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla
Fine paper by F.D. Tombe, well done!

Kelvin's aether vortex idea comes from Maxwell's  B = curl A, while trying to visualize this definition of magnetic field.
But is this correct, does the vacuum only contains vortices?
Tesla described an entirely different, longitudinal wave motion of aether, and this is not a vortex 'action', but this wave is like a sound wave.

If the aether consists of negative and positive charges (not necessarily virtual electrons/positrons but particles with much smaller masses, like neutrinos),  then gravity is described by density variations of the aether.  Density variation of an electrical polarizable aether simply means varation in epsilon_0  and  mu_0  of the vacuum medium,  and this explains the fact that light is bend by a gravity field (it is simply deflection)  and also slightly varies in speed (which was proven beyond a shadow of doubt by Dayton Miller, one of America's greatest physicists in history).

The Maxwellian displacement current (noted as  epsilon_0 mu_0  d(E)/dt )
can be understood very simply, as the polarization current of the charged aether particles.

Einstein claimed that GR  enabled him to find a relation between electricity and gravity, but this was a false claim.  Einstein stole GR from Hilbert, but much worse: he swept under the carpet the experimental proof of Dayton Miller that GR is an incorrect theory.  The fact that light speed varies with the gravity field strength, tells us that vacuum is a medium much like material media like water or air. Vacuum has variable electrical polarizabllity, so it must contain charged particles and the density of these particles can vary.

Since gravity is equivalent with aether density gradient, one can expect a distortion of the Coulomb field of any charged particle in a gravity field.
It is exactly this distortion of the Coulomb field around a particle that gives rise to an acceleration of the particle (charged particles accelerate in a gravity field).

Tesla's longitudinal electric field waves can also be explained by an aether plasma model:  it is an electrical polarization wave such that the aether is no longer electrically neutral, which requires high voltages and high frequency conditions.

Re: The Aethereal Nature of Electric Charge (Score: 1)
by Koen on Sunday, December 30, 2012 @ 12:02:27 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla
Gravity is a weak negative electric charge?  Why isn't gravity a weak positive electric charge?  How does one explain the bending of electromagnetic waves by gravity in terms of Tombe's gravity model?  The same question when considering Dayton Miller's light speed measurements....

Tombe should answer these questions in much detail.  Meanwhile,  I stick to the aether density gradient model,  considering aether a neutral mix of positive and negative charged particles. The idea of a non-constant  epsilon_0 and mu_0  has been explored as well by Puthoff and Ibison  since they published an alternative gravity theory based on a polarizible vacuum. Also Petkov described gravity as an electrodynamic effect, as a consequence of an anisotropic speed of light.  All this is related to aether density variations.

The speed of sound in the atmosphere depends on the temperature and density of the atmosphere. Sound and light waves can be deflected by layers of cold and hot air.

Re: The Aethereal Nature of Electric Charge (Score: 1)
by FDT on Monday, December 31, 2012 @ 14:48:09 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message)
Koen, I was working on the premises that negative charge is the tension in the aether that flows into a sink, whereas positive charge is the pressure in the aether that emerges from a source. That's why I equated gravity with mild negative charge, and not with mild positive charge. As to your other points, I would agree with you that the luminiferous medium is a dielectric comprised of a mix of positive and negative charged particles. Maxwell's displacement current can indeed be understood in the context of linear polarization of such a dielectric sea, but if you study the matter more closely, you will find that this particular understanding is not adequate for the purposes of electromagnetic radiation. We need to have an alternative physical explanation of displacement current based on magnetization. Linear polarization is something which occurs between the plates of a capacitor and which is in the same direction as the electric current. Magnetization on the other hand occurs at the side of an electric current and it is at right angles to the direction of the current, and it is more akin to the angular acceleration of tiny fly-wheels pressing against the electric current. As regards gravity, that is the pure irrotational aether flow that flows through the dielectric luminiferous medium and into atomic and molecular matter, and in doing so it will cause linear polarization and also a density gradient, just as it causes a density gradient in the atmosphere. Gravity will bend light if light itself is a net flow of the same aether between the positive and negative particles that comprise the dielectric luminiferous medium. This has all been explained in numerous papers including "The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field" at http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Research%20Papers-Mechanics%20/%20Electrodynamics/Download/252 [gsjournal.net]

David Tombe



All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.