Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 141 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: Work for GWE... (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Friday, October 17, 2003 @ 10:46:03 UTC I thought I read somewhere on a long time ago either on GWE's site or in one of these posts that the edison device needs to be hooked up to an external power source for around 24 hours untill the system charges. Once it is charged, it can be taken off the GRIP and has its own backup supply of power in the event the edison device process fails you have enough reserves to last one to two days. | Parent Calling fuel cataltst (Score: 1) by chipotle_pickle on Friday, October 17, 2003 @ 11:22:51 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com GWE burns a fuel in water and call it a catalyst. Then they don't let anyone measure how fast it's used up and then claim it's used up very slowly. AEC burns a fuel in water and doesn't say anything about cost, leaving some people to make some fantastic assumptions on what the cost is. Electrolysis is much more efficient than this process, when the cost of recycling the rust back into metal is accounted for. It still might have some applications, but powering homes that have the option of getting grid power is not one if them. To Malcom's point above, there are a lot of things GWE/UFCT could do to look less like a scam. UFCT could report its stock sales to Delaware and pay their 2002 and 2003 tax bill. They could get rid of their Mail Boxes Etc addresses in Boise and the Bay and get an office somewhere. They could hire a spokesperson who puts his name on their PR. They could show the electric bill for the house in Eagle. They could answer reporters questions. They could register GWEP. They could get a tax ID, hire someone to answer the phone at the new office, and pay them and their withholding taxes. They had their press conference in December, when do you think they will accomplish anything other than web page updates? The only deadline they have made for themselves are that by 2005-January they are supposed to have thousands of employees making millions of units a day. But 0 units and 0 staff in November wont be counted as counter-indicative by some. The only other deadline is for the scholarships they were going to award next year. We should hear some people getting checks from that in September. | Parent Re: Calling fuel cataltst by ElectroDynaCat on Friday, October 17, 2003 @ 21:23:03 UTC Re: Work for GWE... (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Monday, October 20, 2003 @ 06:20:39 UTC If "something" degrades slowly it is not a catalyst since the definition of a catalyst is something which speeds up a chemical reaction without itself changing. Therefore whatever "it" is it is part of the reaction. Personally I don't give a damn what it is how it works etc etc. The bottom line is, is there a method of producing hydrogen on demand to be used in fuel cells. The method has be cost effective and practical. A practical solution is one where a car could run for a few hundred miles on one "tank" of "x" and the "tank" can be refilled by the driver. The first technology that solves the problem of feeding fuel cells in a very safe, efficient and cost effective manner will make a killing. regards, Malcolm | Parent

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.