 |
There are currently, 379 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
|
| | The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: Exposing Snoopy (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, October 23, 2003 @ 08:57:29 UTC | Ah, the sluts and nuts tactic, are you a Politician?
I find it hard to believe that if, in today’s security conscious world, MOTSB behaved as you state that he wouldn’t be in protective custody right now.
Instead of attacking the individual why don’t you provide so substantive support of your position? Have GR put some supportive statement on their website as to their belief in this project. |
| Parent |
|
Re: Exposing Snoopy (Score: 1)
by MOTSB on Thursday, October 23, 2003 @ 09:44:44 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | Who are you ? Are you deliberately lying or are you just misstaken? I think you better contact Diane and Micheal again, because I think you got me mixed up with someone else in several cases....First of all, I am not the individual who posted that I talked to the receptionist. My post describes a long and pleasant conversation with both of these people. Why would I describe them as very open and cooperative and sincere appearing, if I was thrown out of the place? In my previous post I said "Diane , My little friend says Daine is pretty and nice and says Hi"...........
That little freind of mine was my 4 year old daughter whom they loved. Not trying to be sneaky or anything, but that may be the reason why I had no problem seeing them...My little girl had fun going downtown and going in a big building. Now I just put out the facts. I may state an opinion now and then, but I have NO VESTED INTEREST in lying to anybody! Why do you think I even am interested in this stuff if I didn't wish it were true,,, If I didn't wish that by some long shot lottery winning chance or fantasy that I was wrong, and that I may witness a true miracle....... so my friend, U got the wrong guy. |
| Parent |
|
Isn't anonymity great (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, October 23, 2003 @ 11:42:17 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | So along with the scams that you run hiding behind anonymity, you also slander and threaten from behind your namelessness. How long have you been doing this? Did it start when Shane was fired from his last job, or was the Kelly family always running businesses where anonymity was an asset? I love it that you don't even deny what we should have known all along, that GWE doesn't pay anybody, can't pay anybody, because they don't exist.
OT - GR has young children in the office often? Writing copy for the GWE website maybe?
To Vlad - If you allow anonymous character assassination, the only posters you will get will be either anonymous or battle hardened. Mostly anonymous (checked the ratio of registered to anon bylines lately?). Wouldn't it be nice if regular people could post without expecting anonymous responses like, oh
John L ? what if the truth is you are an attorney out to slander and cause trouble for lets say two peopl ethat hired you to do it for the large corporation you represent. Oh now there info, I hear you are a lawyer and not what you claim to be, [cut] I think this lawyer got hold of information and is trying to make a mess out of other peoples projects, YOU Dush! I say POST YOUR FULL NAME, WHERE YOU LIVE AND WHERE YOU REALLY WORK AND hell post your drivers license information if you are ligit you try to name people that want to be nameless I hope for your sake that these poeple already have private investigators working on you! Please step in front of a bus you FONY! I care YA BULL SHIT!
newquote
Oh ya thats right, you are representitive of the little whiney Jews that ethnic jokes are made of.
newquote
John L. Could you tell us about the nature of your relationship with Ms Perry and would you also comment on your postion at the technology company you work for. Whats your position there?
newquote
Fact is that these peole have assembled an investigative team and is searching into you so deep that all is going to be posted on the net for all to see and it is my understanding from the person I spoke to is that a buch of different people will be filing suit at you all at once, BOY I HOPE YOU AND YOUR EMPLOYER have DEEP POCKETS!
BLACK MAIL JOHN, REALLY? Whats with that?
[I dunno. What is with that? Anyone want to make that charge with their names signed to it? File a police report maybe? Cut.]
Fact - I live in your neiborhood and have been assisting withthe investigative team into your affairs SO ARE you affraid to contradict yourself here on line and have it differ from what the investigators release
Most people don't want to take part in a discussion like that, and it's what happens when you allow a continuing criminal enterprise post anonymously. GWE doesn't care any more about not ruining your forum than it cares about the investors it's ripping off or the vendors it's stiffing. Myself, I've eaten so many chipotles and that now I need pequins to feel the heat. And I like the heat. |
| Parent- Re: Isn't anonymity great by Anonymous on Thursday, October 23, 2003 @ 16:21:02 UTC
- What state are they in? by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, October 23, 2003 @ 16:53:52 UTC
- Re: What state are they in? by Anonymous on Thursday, October 23, 2003 @ 17:56:45 UTC
- Thanks. That's new. by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, October 23, 2003 @ 18:08:32 UTC
- And just last month, they by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, October 23, 2003 @ 19:55:35 UTC
- More funny business with names by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, October 23, 2003 @ 22:10:27 UTC
- GWE existance challenge now over? by chipotle_pickle on Friday, October 24, 2003 @ 11:27:54 UTC
- GWE Technologies, we hardly knew you by TilEulenspiegel on Saturday, June 11, 2005 @ 21:10:27 UTC
- Re: What state are they in? by Anonymous on Thursday, October 23, 2003 @ 18:00:30 UTC
|
|
|
|
