Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 150 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register This is too much spin Rasta (Score: 1) by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 16:21:18 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com I'm trying to understand the distinction you are making between the GWE demoing the Hammacher device for investors or a device that "supposedly looked like" the Hammacher, and it just seems like marketing spin. Why "supposedly" looked like? The person who saw it, after seeing the Hammacher, thought that that is what GWE had shown them. (Technically, UFCT. This was probably before there even was a GWE.) Could the witness be incorrect? Certainly not incorrect enough that it doesn't even really look like the Hammacher. Why do you think the person who saw both is wrong? Rasta, you have been unwilling to address the contradiction between the investor posts you have read and the denial that their are any investors (and several other contradictions). But everyone is different about what contradictions they can tolerate. This is why it's important to point out every problem with their story. Everyone has different areas where they are experts, different areas where they are idiots, and different ways at ariving at conclusions. Some people who were not bothered at all by the initial red flags dropped them in a heartbeat when they claimed that they were going to make a million units a day in 2004. They were willing to accept wierd science and messed up electronics, but put their foot down seeing the impossible logistics and marketing. Other people stuck with them through that but gave up on them over other strange requests in the license application process. Some people change their minds slowly as they see more and more empty promises and no substance. For some people, there will never be enough proof. Think about people who still think that Keely invnted a PMM 100 years ago or Denniss Lee dealers. I am patient. | Parent Re: Whats the Motive? by rycer on Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 20:32:34 UTC Whats the Motive? by Anonymous on Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 22:05:12 UTC Re: Whats the Motive? by Anonymous on Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 22:46:08 UTC Re: Whats the Motive? by Anonymous on Friday, January 23, 2004 @ 02:47:35 UTC Re: Whats the Motive? by baldy on Saturday, January 24, 2004 @ 03:36:12 UTC Re: Whats the Motive? by Anonymous on Saturday, January 24, 2004 @ 03:53:13 UTC Didivdend nonsense by chipotle_pickle on Sunday, January 25, 2004 @ 07:34:28 UTC This mental exercise... by Anonymous on Sunday, January 25, 2004 @ 12:52:22 UTC Re: My last post to this thread... (Score: 1) by baldy on Saturday, January 24, 2004 @ 03:25:31 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) I made this same resolve and I applaud your resolve. I had a private conversation on the member chatroom with this limp pickle and could only conclude he needed to go back to Junior college and take a philospophy 101 course and learn to reason to a conclusion rather than the reverse. He sent back that his minor was in Philo. I replied I felt bad for his Philo Prof. for he had been a total failure. I then asked this site to put a muzzle on some posters or an ignore button as on Yahoo. They wouldn't so I quit posting. I will read one like yours. I am glad to see someone else step forward and call it the way it is! Oops they need a spell and grammer check on this thing also. | Parent

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.