Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 193 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

  • (August 7, 2024 - August 11, 2024) 2024 ExtraOrdinary Technology Conference

  • Hot Links

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science


    ECW E-Cat World


    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times



    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site


    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: How does this compare to solar or wind cost/kW-h ? (Score: 1)
    by malc on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 @ 00:16:44 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://web.ukonline.co.uk/mripley
    Just slightly over unity is also suspicious in that it could be due to measurement error. Why oh why do folks continue with these statements and "proof" of excess heat etc. Here's a simple test for any over unity device:

    1. Take 1 fully charged battery to power the "device".
    2. Take 10 fully discharged batteries of the same capacity as the charged battery (NB same size , shape, colour,make etc i.e. 3 batteries from the same production line !)
    3. Wire everything up and show that the device charges the 10 flat batteries.
    4. You are allowed switch batteries as many times as you like!

    Time is not a factor as long as you end up with 10 charged batteries.

    Maybe its time for the free energy community to dismiss all claims of over unity unless it can pass or claim to pass an unambiguous test. Preferably a practical test that proves its use "in the home", as described above. All these "excess heat" claims and "slight over unity" claims are all literally ignored. The inventors then have to go back to the drawing board and create a practical device instead of an anamolous one.

    So how about it folks at zpenergy.com, we define an unambiguous test and only provide news space to those inventors who can claim to pass that test?

    | Parent

    Re: How does this compare to solar or wind cost/kW-h ? (Score: 1)
    by Overtone on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 @ 01:05:17 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.magneticpowerinc.com
    The components are inherently cost effective, being commonly available magnetic materials and electronic parts. MPI is a licensing firm, therefore prices will be set by licensees, Although initially they may be higher, our target suggestion is $2,000/kW. Eventually, the price in mass production is likely to fall as generators in very large fabrication quantities become commodities. Since these units will function 24/7, electricty produced will be less expensive than solar or wind. Probably dropping to less than a penny per kW-hr.

    | Parent

    Re: How does this compare to solar or wind cost/kW-h ? (Score: 1)
    by bender772 on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 @ 01:28:30 GMT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.suppressedscience.net
    While "slightly over unity" may not be enough to revolutionize energy production, it may be enough to revolutionize thinking. Right now, mainstream
    science still considers free energy science-fiction. Something that we may have centuries from now, if at all. Often, mainstream physicists such as the spokesman of the APS dismiss free energy claims by appealing to the law of conservation of energy without even looking at the actual device. Look at the mainstream debate on the energy crisis. Free energy isn't even mentioned. The environmental groups ignore it completely. The political parties
    ignore it. The media - mainstream, progressive and conservative - are united in ignoring it.

    If Mr. Goldes succeeds in mass producing even a toy which produces minimal power, but in perpetuity, the consequences would be enormous. People could buy it and show it to their congressmen, the media, the engineers and physicists at their local university, and to the environmental group. Once a breakthrough in mass awareness is achieved, the public would demand a Manhattan program to develop practical, high-performance free energy devices. Even if the politicians didn't listen, private investors would pour billions into the field. The only reason they don't do now is because they consider free energy science-fiction.

    | Parent


    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.