Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 172 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: Life After the Oil Crash (Score: 1) by aleatha on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 @ 10:40:31 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) hi Vlad! don't worry there is enough arcane tech in washington's patent vaults to deal with the oil thing. the best are the devices that tap the magnetosphere as the solar wind makes it oscillate. there are others though. thorium/uranium based induced radioctivity. plasmatic generators (convert the energy of a flame right to electricity.) borealis heat to energy tech. tons of stuff. it's all money and power garbage. also they can use the naptha recovered from the green river formation to make gunnerman's A-21. then there are those less out there ones: vertical axis wind turbines,gorlov hydroturbines,pelamis generators. | Parent fun expierment! (Score: 1) by aleatha on Wednesday, June 28, 2006 @ 11:09:40 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) want a battery to last a decade? and by that i mean not rechargeing or repairing it for a decade. take some chunk of yellow cake or urano-nitrile or thorium. (wear plastic gloves to avoid particles adhereing to skin) now with a 40kv DC source atach the nagative lead to a ceramic radio shack magnet. put this magnet on your radioisotope and leave it negatively charged for about 27 hours. now take anhydrous ammonia and fill it in a glass jar. in the glass jar's lid put strip of copper and a strip of steel and seal it up airtight. now drop the altered magnet into the jar seal the lid. you have a battery that should last 10 years from a brief charging of the magnet. the best thing is that so little radioisotope is in the magnet that it is not a radiation hazard on exposure to the enviorment. here is a machine you can make without radioisotopes for you purists out there. it is powered by cosmic rays which are manufactured largely from the solar wind. it is like a crookes tube. just modified for cosmic particles not light. get a big bottomed flask with a stopper. now like one-way glass. half silver the outside. (so particles can get through and reflected too!) fill the flask with high density hydrogen. now put a magnetic rod half in and half out of the flask. seal the thing air tight. wrap a coil around the exposed rod for power. this thing is so similar to the crookes tube that it will generate power from a laser shined at the vessel too not just cosmic rays. unlike the tube though it has been configured to output electricity not motion of vanes. this thing was part of tesla's papers siezed by the FBI. it was part of a collaboration bettween crookes and tesla. as visible light was to weak to be powerful enough for usefulness in crooke's radiometer. they undertook a method to convert high energy cosmic rays. like tesla said he was able to operate a motor with it. (crookes tubes can't drive motors) tesla used the civil war reaction Fe+ H2SO4  to make the hydrogen. but it is better to use the aluminum/water reaction. for laser energy conversion the USAF says nitrogen/UV lasers are best. UV being very invigorating to hydrogen. lasers are only for high power fast though. it can easily run a motor just from cosmic rays on earth. | Parent Re: fun expierment! by seanu on Thursday, June 29, 2006 @ 04:53:26 UTC Re: Re: fun expierment! by aleatha on Thursday, June 29, 2006 @ 05:22:34 UTC

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.