 |
There are currently, 367 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
|
| | The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: More FE devices videos (Score: 1)
by modernsteam on Wednesday, March 21, 2007 @ 07:10:08 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | There's nothing wrong with being skeptical when we're being informed of
an event or phenomenon for the first time. You're right to ask those
questions too. I, as a F-E enthusiast, am skeptical about specific
devices under those circumstances. I believe just about all F-E
"believers" are the same, but not about the probability of F-E in
general.
Your contention that an F-E device must show simplicity is, however,
quite wrong. The internal combustion engine is not at all simple, as we
all know, and by common sense, shouldn't work. But it does, and has
done so to varying degrees for over 100 years.
F-E is much more difficult than any ICE, and we could therefore expect
that there would be far more performance "bugs" than in the first IC
engines. Another complex example is the Howe sewing machine, the
improved variants of which we use today (the Singer machine was an
improvement on the Howe device). The sewing machine has worked
beautifully for over 150 years, but it's extremely complex.
That's the way it's probably going to be for F-E devices, which are
highly, and I do mean highly, non-linear -
the particle/waves being "all over the place". Think of a bunch of
soldiers in boot camp constantly out of control, each a potential
power-house in his/her own right. Put them together in a coherent
co-operative fashion, and they can do productive work almost
synergistically. With all due respect for who look askance at their
army life, good non-coms and officers can exercise that kind of
beneficial control. Imagine an electronic controller on a chip which
can do the same thing with a F-E device: bringing errant particle/waves
to "heel", as it were, each photon (particle/wave) coming in phase upon
another onto a charge carrier - usually an electron - to add to the
potential of each electron, creating a desired disequiliobrium - an
imbalance, like a wound spring, or stored heat, ready to do work on
release.
You should definitely demand more information about the rods, the wood,
and all other device claims. As I said, I, as a F-E enthusiast would
have immediate doubts without the developer stating some sort of
hypothesis at minimum, as to how it works, and then, either we'd have
to see it working, or there'd have to be a high degree of logic to it.
However, if we are fortunate enough to see the device working as
claimed, for a long enough period of time to establish that it is
more than any fuel-based, including electrochemical or
capacitive-type battery, or conventional renewable system can provide,
we must acknowledge it as a fact, like it or not, and with the urgency
for clean and cheap energy sources today, we must develop it.
Hal Ade
|
| Parent |
|
Some good questions (Score: 1)
by nanotech on Wednesday, March 21, 2007 @ 17:27:38 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | I have watched this particular video set several times and I have some questions. While it appears to work as claimed, somehow absorbing neutrino flux or background vacuum energy/ether, my questions are the following:
1 What specific elements/atom types are needed?
2 How many and how much of these atoms are needed for each rod?
The man is very vague about the above two questions, as to what exact element mixes he uses, and, how much of each element is necessary for the observed effect. I would gladly welcome comments to my post.
|
| Parent |
|
Re: More FE devices videos (Score: 1)
by infringer on Sunday, March 25, 2007 @ 06:16:27 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | The Papp engine I have seen that video quite some time ago... I believe it could work due to the properties of argon I recall reading something about heavy elements and something being mentioned about argon though I am not sure as to how it relates....
The Two poles however this is a first...
Why would you not try to go somewhere with these devices show them to the EFF even or someone of importance that will do something with them besides the govt.
I'll tell you I sure as heck would invest in something like this imagine the marketability of these devices...
Anyhow there is lots of great things out there that go unoticed because folks do not have the right direction on what to do with such things.
What we need is to make it obvious on what course we should take if we find such a device to protect the intellectual property rights of the individual... It seems as if it is money that is wanted. Rightfully so but at the same time they should explain everything give plans on how to make it so people can verify these things who have the money and the connections once it is patented.
You know I almost do wonder if the rods ar not similar to the "hutchinson battery"
Anyhow enjoy,
-infringer- |
| Parent |
|
|
|
