From the FE vault - The Schaeffer Steam Generator
Date: Sunday, March 20, 2005 @ 12:58:00 UTC Topic: Devices
In the free-energy yahoo group, "Elias Reminton" writes: Time for another mental laxative ... V2.1
http://www.rexresearch.com/schaeffe/schaeffe.htm
Add to Water hammer & dry steam stuff ...
"Darn! I wish i was paid for this ! "
LOL !
Hector :)
From: "Paul Stearns"
Subject: Re: Steam & thermodinamics and OU ( In series with bingomotor post )
Hector:
OK, I'll grant that this device and Griggs'
(http://www.alternativescience.com/over-unity.htm)
device appear overunity based on the information presented. Would you care to provide a little "fiber" by giving us drawings to show how to create the rotor and housing assembly?
Paul
----------------
Cribbed from Bill Beaty @ www.eskimo.com:
From: (Marshall Dudley)
Subject: Another theory for Griggs device
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 1994 12:14 -0500 (EST)
In a previous post I hinted at another possibility of what may be happening in the Griggs device when I mentioned "non-linearities in the steam table" as one of several things that should be looked at. Since I did not get any bites on that, let me outline a discussion I had with a scientist from Oak Ridge National Labs about the Griggs device several months ago. This discussion is off the record, and most likely will not be collaborated, just as some of the results of their CF cell experiments are.
I had an occasion to meet with this person and begun describing the Griggs device to him. After telling him how it worked I ended it with, "and it is reported to produce more steam or hot water than then the input power should produce". His response was "that's not surprising". I was almost floored.
He then told me that is a fairly well known fact among some researchers that the published steam tables are wrong. The original team which made up the steam tables found that toward the extremes (high pressure high temperature and low pressure and temperature) there are unexplained non-linearities. Since these non-linearities could not be explained, and were shown to not obey the conservation of energy, they fudged the tables to get rid of the non-linearities. They had assumed that there must be an error in their measurements or equipment since it did not jive with theory. Since then others have found the same thing, but none of them will stick their neck out to declare that steam tables which have been in use for decades are wrong, especially since there seems to be no theory to explain these non-linearities. Anyway, he said that if you go through a cycle of vaporization at one pressure and condensation at a higher pressure and temperature, when you get back to the original temperature and pressure the "corrected" steam table does not close. That is to say, according to the measurements there is steam left over which should not be there, and by conservation of energy cannot be there. Anyway, he said that it seems that such a device such as Griggs would enhance this non-linearity effect and therefore produce more energy than is supplied. He does not have the foggiest idea where the excess energy could come from, but simply that given what he knows about the non-linearities in the (corrected) steam tables, that seems like a good place to start looking. I find the idea intriguing, but as with so many other theories, it leaves one with as many questions as it gives answers.
|
|