
Patent issued for anti gravity device!
Date: Friday, November 11, 2005 @ 16:09:52 UTC Topic: Devices
Dr Jack Sarfatti writes: He has something like my idea in my 3 books,
but I doubt that what he has will actually work. But he is seeing part
of what I am seeing.
[Eric Taber] Apparently the USPTO has violated its rules and
guidelines, patenting a device that defies the known laws of physics.
Patent Number 6,960,975 was issued to Boris Volfson of Huntington, IN,
wherein the device is described: quote: A cooled hollow superconductive
shield is energized by an electromagnetic field resulting in the
quantized vortices of lattice ions projecting a gravitomagnetic field
that forms a spacetime curvature anomaly outside the space vehicle.
[Jack Sarfatti] That has to be shown in detail with the equations of GR. Is there such an effect? And how strong is it?
[Eric Taber] The spacetime curvature imbalance, the spacetime curvature
being the same as gravity, provides for the space vehicle's propulsion.
[Jack Sarfatti] Badly said. They are groping for the idea of geodesic
warp drive. That is, changing local curvature field at the ship in such
a way as to shape the timelike geodesic, with small tidal geodesic
deviation over the scale of the ship, as desired.
[Eric Taber] The space vehicle, surrounded by the spacetime anomaly,
may move at a speed approaching the light-speed characteristic for the
modified locale.
[Jack Sarfatti] Meaningless sentence.
[Eric Taber]
Anti-gravity device patent
Wow! What do you think? /Eric
[Jack Sarfatti] Glimmer of correct idea, but wrong implementation. I am pretty sure it won't fly...
[Read all Sarfatti comments on the text of the patent in our Forum ...Vlad]
-------
UPI news: The journal Nature said
patent 6,960,975 was granted Nov. 1 to Boris Volfson of Huntington,
Ind., for a space vehicle propelled by a superconducting shield that
alters the curvature of space-time outside the craft in a way that
counteracts gravity.
One of the main theoretical arguments against anti-gravity is that it implies the availability of unlimited energy.
"If you design an anti-gravity machine, you've got a
perpetual-motion machine," Robert Park of the American Physical Society
told Nature.
Park said the action shows patent examiners are being duped by false science.
Copyright 2005 by United Press International
---------
Bill Alek writes:
"Abstract of US6960975
A space vehicle propelled by the pressure of inflationary vacuum state
is provided comprising a hollow superconductive shield, an inner
shield, a power source, a support structure, upper and lower means for
generating an electromagnetic field, and a flux modulation controller.
..."
"... [0022] By creating a spacetime curvature anomaly associated with
lowered pressure of inflationary vacuum state around a space vehicle,
with the lowest vacuum pressure density located directly in front of
the vehicle, a condition could be created where gravity associated with
lowered vacuum pressure density pulls the vehicle forward in modified
spacetime.
[0023] By creating a spacetime curvature anomaly associated with
elevated pressure of inflationary vacuum state around the space
vehicle, with the point of highest vacuum pressure density located
directly behind the vehicle, a condition could be created where a
repulsion force associated with elevated vacuum pressure density pushes
the space vehicle forward in modified spacetime. From the
above-mentioned cosmological constant equation, re-written as:
[mathematical formula - see original document] it is clear that the
increase in the vacuum pressure density could lead to a substantial
increase in the light-speed. If the space vehicle is moving in the
anomaly where the local light-speed is higher than the light-speed of
the ambient vacuum, and if this vehicle approaches this local
light-speed, the space vehicle would then possibly exceed the
light-speed characteristic for the ambient area. ..."
This sounds like the Alcubierre Warp Drive from the mid '90s.
"... [0025] The levitating and rotating superconductor disk, which
Podkletnov used to protect the object of experiment from the attraction
produced by the energy of the vacuum, was externally energized by the
externally-powered solenoid coils. Thus, Podkletnov's system is
stationary by definition and not suitable for travel in air or space.
Even if the superconductive disk is made part of the craft, and if it
is energized by the energy available on the craft, the resulting
anomaly is one-sided, not enveloping, and not providing the variable
speed of light (VSL) environment for the craft. ..."
This patent reads more like a paper than a patent.
Bill
William S. Alek
FREE ENERGY, Antigravitational, and Time Travel Technologies http://groups.yahoo.com/group/intalek
--------
Garry Voss writes: See Paul Potters UFO Propulsion Drive Ilistrations by clicking on: UFO Physics. I think there is a connection here.
--------
Robert Neil Boyd writes: Dear Sirs,
"Vacuum pressure density" is a contradiction in terms.
In a supposed vacuum, there is nothing existing which can cause
pressure, by definition of the term "vacuum". The pressure of nothing
is zero. The density of nothing is zero. The term is pure BS.
There is a REAL substance making a REAL pressure and a REAL density,
which factors result from the measurable activities of the consituent
subquantum particles comprising the aether plenum.
What exactly is this so-called "Inflationary vaccum state"? Where is
this term defined? And what causes it? And where is there any
reproducable physical evidence for this fictional entity? Why do we
need it in the first darn place?
And by what means does a supposed "inflationary vacuum state" create a supposed "lowered pressure" ? Lowered pressure of what?
The expression of "space-time curvature", since it is implied by the
expression to be a localized space time curvature, is in direct
contradiction to Einstein's Relativity Theory, where Einstein insisted
for the last 30 years of his life that any curvature of space, could
only occur at cosmological scales. Then, given the additional fact that
the universe is infinite in volume, if there were indeed any curvature
to space at the cosmological scale, such curvature would be perfectly
immeasurable. Thus, this is an unprovable hypothesis, with no more
validity than pink elephants.
This is all delusionary gobbledegook designed to confuse and mislead the readers regarding the actual facts of the situation.
There is no "vacuum", by definition of the term. There does exist a
plenum filled with subquantum particles, which is inhabited by
creatures of all velocities, from zero velocity to infinite velocity,
and everything in between.
We can create density gradients in this media by various means, and
generate propulsion, by various means. But the descriptions in this
document are not at all accurate descriptions of any of any the correct
means of attaining propulsion in interstellar space.
The document is purely misleading deception, in my opinion, based on
elephants of various colors, rather than on reproducably observable and
instrumentable facts.
That being said, there is some grain of truth in it, that can only be
discovered when one knows the actual physics involved, which are in
fact, aether physics. None of this "inflationary vacuum state pressure
density" nonsense.
Get the idea of a plenum of subquantum particles, which can vary in
local density and velocity, then look at the text again. Substitute the
correct understandings and dispense with the misleading lables created
in the text, and you might see something of what they are attemoting to
describe.
One more thing. Their evaluation of Podkletnov's super conducting disk
propulsion method is perfectly wrong. Such a method can be perfectly
well applied and will function perfectly well.
The difficulty with this method is in the hazard resulting from any
exposure to the back-acting beam, which results after some delay in
time, after the initiating high power electrical impulse. Any organic
Life which happens to be in physical contact with any inorganic object,
at the time the back-acting beam passes through the vicinity, will find
themselves inextricably welded to the inorganic object.
An inconvenience, to say the least. I have brought several suggestions
to Podkletnov regarding various means to eliminate this hazard. But
until the problem is solved, this means of propulsion will have
severely limited applications. It appears to me that two of my
suggestions will resolve the problem. The problem is that it requires a
lot of money to implement either of them, something which Podkletov's
team has a lack of. Give them more money, and I'll bet the problem will
be solved shortly.
Neil
|
|