Is General Theory of Relativity really "general"?
Date: Monday, September 24, 2007 @ 20:17:53 GMT
Topic: Science


We know that by calling the General Theory of Relativity, Einstein thought that his latter theory somehow encompassed the previous Special Theory of Relativity and the theory of gravitation. But is it really so?

Based on the very Special Theory of Relativity and the curvature tensor and matter tensor, together with a thought experiment, we can show that both special theory of relativity and general theory of relativity have an intrinsic contradiction among themselves. And the theories of relativity are to be explored further to tackle this contradiction. In other words, the theories of relativity are not “always right” such as the mass media often praises, when the scientists find any new data confirming the theories.

Now let’s make it clearer.

The equation of General Theory of Relativity is as follows:


R(i,k) = k T(i,k) (1)

k is Einstein’s gravitational constant

R(i,k) is Riemann tensor of curvature

T(i,k) is the matter tensor.

Let’s suppose we have a distribution of matter, being concentrated in a very small area around a point O in space. Then we examine the curvature of space time at a point P. The distance between O and P is 300 000 km + 2 meters.

Without regarding the wave nature (traveling nature) of gravity, Einstein could have found and we could find that the curvature of space time at the point P is a solution C(i) of the equation (1). Just calculate the matter tensor and the curvature tensor.

Now at the time t1 we start moving such matter distribution one meter away from O to a point B, then stop moving this matter distribution at the time t1+1 second while keeping the geometrical shape of this matter distribution unchanged.

1) At the time t1+1, if General Theory of Relativity is to be used as presence, we could have found a new solution C(n) of space time curvature at the point P just by applying again the equation (1) for the matter distribution at the point B. This is the instant interaction that even Einstein had not escaped its bound when he forwarded his General Theory of Relativity.

2) By the very basics of Special Theory of Relativity, we can state that if a light ray was switched on at O at the time t1, this light ray would still be traveling from O to P and could not have reached the point P at the time t1+1 second, then an observer at P at the time (t1+1s) was no way possible to detect any change of the matter distribution while we moved this matter distribution between O and B. (No information about a physical system can be transmitted and received at a speed that is higher than light speed in vacuum!)

Now the contradiction is very clear:

a) By argument 1), we could find the curvature change of space time at P at the time t1+ 1 second

b) By argument 2) of the very Special Theory of Relativity, we should not have detected (or more precisely, we could not detect) any change of the curvature at P, caused by the change of matter distribution at the time t1 +1 second.

By this very contradiction between the “General Theory” of Relativity and the Special Theory of Relativity, is the General Theory still “general” at all. And if the incorporation of General Theory to Special Theory produces a contradiction among themselves, can we have a right to revise carefully the theories of relativity?






This article comes from ZPEnergy.com
http://www.zpenergy.com

The URL for this story is:
http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2558