Addressing
the question of when to seek for a patent and when not to seek for a
patent on "free
energy" technology. Lists alternatives for
"game-changing" technologies that should not go the patent
route. (PESWiki; Oct. 2, 2007)
"Patents are important and perhaps even crucial for most any key
technology that is not game-changing. Most energy technologies fit this
criteria.
Nevertheless, there are alternative routes
to be considered even for these more benign technologies, which may
allow for a more rapid development and dissemination of the technology
than if the patent route is followed..."
See the PESWiki "discussion page" for this article for comments.
Also, read the interesting comments on the topic posted to some surveys run on this site on this subject, such as:
What is inventor's best & safest path to success?
What is the best model for bringing a real OU device to the people?
You have a real, working FE device; where would you go first?
For now, secrecy orders on FE patents are justified
Should a free/open/reputable international FE technology testing organization be established?
