
Solar cell directly splits water for hydrogen
Date: Monday, February 18, 2008 @ 22:12:35 UTC Topic: Science
Plants trees and algae do it. Even some bacteria and moss do it, but
scientists have had a difficult time developing methods to turn
sunlight into useful fuel. Now, Penn State researchers have a
proof-of-concept device that can split water and produce recoverable
hydrogen.
"This is a proof-of-concept
system that is very inefficient. But ultimately, catalytic systems with
10 to 15 percent solar conversion efficiency might be achievable," says
Thomas E. Mallouk, the DuPont Professor of Materials Chemistry and
Physics. "If this could be realized, water photolysis would provide a
clean source of hydrogen fuel from water and sunlight."
Although solar cells can now
produce electricity from visible light at efficiencies of greater than
10 percent, solar hydrogen cells – like those developed by Craig
Grimes, professor of electrical engineering at Penn State – have been
limited by the poor spectral response of the semiconductors used. In
principle, molecular light absorbers can use more of the visible
spectrum in a process that is mimetic of natural photosynthesis.
Photosynthesis uses chlorophyll and other dye molecules to absorb
visible light.
So far, experiments with natural and synthetic dye molecules have
produced either hydrogen or oxygen-using chemicals consumed in the
process, but have not yet created an ongoing, continuous process. Those
processes also generally would cost more than splitting water with
electricity. One reason for the difficulty is that once produced,
hydrogen and oxygen easily recombine. The catalysts that have been used
to study the oxygen and hydrogen half-reactions are also good catalysts
for the recombination reaction.
Mallouk and W. Justin Youngblood, postdoctoral fellow in chemistry,
together with collaborators at Arizona State University, developed a
catalyst system that, combined with a dye, can mimic the electron
transfer and water oxidation processes that occur in plants during
photosynthesis. They reported the results of their experiments at the
annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of
Science today in Boston.
The key to their process is a tiny complex of molecules with a
center catalyst of iridium oxide molecules surrounded by orange-red dye
molecules. These clusters are about 2 nanometers in diameter with the
catalyst and dye components approximately the same size. The
researchers chose orange-red dye because it absorbs sunlight in the
blue range, which has the most energy. The dye used has also been
thoroughly studied in previous artificial photosynthesis experiments.
They space the dye molecules
around the center core leaving surface area on the catalyst for the
reaction. When visible light strikes the dye, the energy excites
electrons in the dye, which, with the help of the catalyst, can split
the water molecule, creating free oxygen.
"Each surface iridium atom can cycle through the water oxidation
reaction about 50 times per second," says Mallouk. "That is about three
orders of magnitude faster than the next best synthetic catalysts, and
comparable to the turnover rate of Photosystem II in green plant
photosynthesis." Photosystem II is the protein complex in plants that
oxidizes water and starts the photosynthetic process.
The researchers impregnated a titanium dioxide electrode with the
catalyst complex for the anode and used a platinum cathode. They
immersed the electrodes in a salt solution, but separated them from
each other to avoid the problem of the hydrogen and oxygen recombining.
Light need only shine on the dye-sensitized titanium dioxide anode for
the system to work. This type of cell is similar to those that produce
electricity, but the addition of the catalyst allows the reaction to
split the water into its component gases.
The water splitting requires 1.23 volts, and the current
experimental configuration cannot quite achieve that level so the
researchers add about 0.3 volts from an outside source. Their current
system achieves an efficiency of about 0.3 percent.
"Nature is only 1 to 3 percent efficient with photosynthesis," says
Mallouk. "Which is why you can not expect the clippings from your lawn
to power your house and your car. We would like not to have to use all
the land area that is used for agriculture to get the energy we need
from solar cells."
The researchers have a variety of approaches to improve the
process. They plan to investigate improving the efficiency of the dye,
improving the catalyst and adjusting the general geometry of the
system. Rather than spherical dye catalyst complexes, a different
geometry that keeps more of the reacting area available to the sun and
the reactants might be better. Improvements to the overall geometry may
also help.
"At every branch in the process, there is a choice," says Mallouk.
"The question is how to get the electrons to stay in the proper path
and not, for example, release their energy and go down to ground state
without doing any work."
The distance between molecules is important in controlling the rate
of electron transfer and getting the electrons where they need to go.
By shortening some of the distances and making others longer, more of
the electrons would take the proper path and put their energy to work
splitting water and producing hydrogen.
Source: Penn State Via: http://www.physorg.com/news122534699.html
|
|