From Tom Bearden's recent correspondence: Dear
some somewhat unusual physics information that is of the utmost
importance to science and to our nation.
simple technique pointed out long ago by Paul Dirac, one can easily
"tickle" the local vacuum into containing not only positive
energy/positive probabilities, but also negative energy/negative
probabilities. With the combination, one then can directly engineer
physical reality itself.
glimpse of this ability so startled and panicked the scientific
leadership in the late 1920s and very early 1930s, that they
arbitrarily ripped out negative energy in physics, insofar as
possible, in absolute fear of what it portended.
some leading physicists such as Dan Solomon (Rauland-Borg Corporation, Skokie, IL), have published very rigorous
papers in the hard literature, pointing out that ripping out negative
energy arbitrarily WAS NOT following scientific method. And their
papers clearly show -- rigorously -- that such an action is in total
error and totally violates the very creed of science itself. [vlad: see http://zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1969]
Klimov's work at Los Alamos National Laboratory, independently
replicated by another large lab, published widely in the hard
literature since 2005 and now migrated into the standard
nanocrystalline community, proves conclusively that real systems can
be built which deliberately extract and use excess EM energy directly
from the seething virtual state vacuum. With the laboratory proof and
several independent replications, this has now been proven to the full
requirement of the scientific method.
presently have at least five operating processes that (inadvertently)
are using this negative energy process to directly do "unhappening" in
physics of actual ongoing observable phenomena. One is a watergas
process, one is a cure for cancer (100% success in phase one animal
trials), one is an energy-from-the-vacuum process by Mills (the
hydrino process), one is the Soviet technology of "cold molding"
whereby lattice bonds of a material (specifically, titanium) are "unhappened"
by the tickled vacuum, thus liquifying the titanium at room
temperature so that it can be simply poured in very thick molds
(submarine hulls). Waiting a bit until the vacuum resumes normalcy as
energy holes are filled by random electrons, the vacuum returns to
normal and the lattice bonds resume.
can give this subject a little thought, hopefully you will see the
vast implications of it -- entry into the final physics by the ability
to directly engineer observed physical reality itself. Indeed, one may
argue that the final purpose of science anyway is to be able to
engineer physical reality rather much at will! so if we can learn to
do so easily and without "brute force", letting the more complex
vacuum contain both positive and negative energy,
it revolutionizes present chemistry
and physics and all of science.
allows our scientists to do beneficial things previously
inconceivable. As a single example, we have more than 1300 large pools
of carbon wastes from coal-burning power plants in this nation --
waiting to be "sequestered" on some vague day and in some vague way.
This is the type of rather terrible contamination that recently had a
large "spill" in
Tennessee when one of the
retaining dams crumbled. Wouldn't it be nice to be able to "pattern
the Dirac vacuum-tickling" precisely so as to completely neutralize
those carbon wastes by actual transmutation of offending elements and
compounds? Or to quickly and cheaply render the rapidly increasing
present nuclear wastes absolutely safe again by directly transmuting
the offensive radioactive elements involved?
appears that precursor engineering is a scientific fact whose time has
come, and which can now be recognized, developed, and utilized by our
organized professional scientific community.
good that it can do is mind-numbing -- such as (1) eventually cure any
disease quickly, easily, and cheaply; (2) take our needed electrical
energy directly from the vacuum cleanly, cheaply, and efficiently, and
(3) transpose even desert sand into nourishing biological food to feed
the present starving peoples in so many parts of the world, etc. These
are but three of the thousands and thousands of future applications
that can -- and hopefully will -- be developed.
The Data from Modern Physics and Modern Physicists: Tom Bearden
This year we will be accenting the astonishingly simple underlying
vacuum mechanism for directly engineering physical reality at will. It
turns out (as per Paul Dirac) that it is very easy to "tickle" a local
vacuum region with little sharp gradient pulses of positive energy so
that the tickled vacuum region also contains negative energy/negative
probabilities in its ongoing vacuum virtual particle reactions, in
addition to the normal positive energy/positive probabilities usually
Here is a magic little formula (that only took me 35 years to write):
[space-time] ≡ [virtual particle flux of vacuum] ≡ [energy]
With this little formula, we suddenly have a completely unified
physics, and we have totally eliminated any idea of "empty" space.
This formula is engineerable by using an extraordinarily simple
process: Dirac's local
Notice the deltas of each term in the little "identity equation" also
identify the same way. So at long last we have finally found a
resolution to one of Feynman's stated major problems of physics:
previously we have not really known what energy itself identically is.
E.g., quoting Nobelist Feynman: "It
is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge of
what energy is." [Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton,
and Matthew Sands, The Feynman
Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, Vol. 1,
1964, p. 4-2].
And it is notoriously false to state that "energy is the capacity to
do work", as is so commonly stated. Even the Physics Teacher folks
could not stand that gross error any longer, and they published the
following article on it:
"Energy is not the ability to do work,"
Physics Teacher, Vol. 15,
1973, p. 15.ri. The rigorous definition of work is this: work is the
changing of the form of some energy. And when the form of 100 joules
of energy in Form A is changed to 100 joules of energy in a different
form (Form B), then 100 joules of work has been done and the energy is
still there but in a now-different form, Form B. We do not and cannot
"consume" or "destroy" energy in any special relativity situation.
There is no conservation of work law; there is only a conservation of
energy law that holds in any special relativity situation (one fixed
In the virtual state vacuum, THERE IS NO EMPTINESS filled with its
incredibly energetic virtual particle flux -- instead, there is only
that virtual particle flux. THERE IS NO EMPTINESS. We have completely
erased the very notion of "empty space".
The common positive energy/positive probabilities "vacuum" is just the
"additive" bubbling particle flux resulting in a statistical "positive
probabilities" ensemble of ever-higher energy interactions on into in
the observable state and upwards in it. Such a statistical ensemble of
ongoing additive "bubbling" vacuum virtual particle flux reactions,
for example, continually creates every "observable" in the universe.
I.e., instead of the old mechanical view of an observable object that
"it just is and it concretely exists", we have the more advanced
understanding that "it is continually being created and 'happening' at
an incredible rate".
Quoting Dirac on the arbitrary "removing" of negative energy from
"One gets over the difficulty on the classical theory by arbitrarily
excluding those solutions that have a negative E. One cannot do this
in the quantum theory, since in general a perturbation will cause
transitions from states with E positive to states with E negative."
[Dirac, Proceedings of the Royal
Society A, Vol. 117, p. 610.].
Note that in this quotation Dirac
reveals the extraordinarily simple mechanism for making negative
energy in a selected region of vacuum. Simply hit it with some
tiny-energy sharp-gradient pulses -- as the little RF pulse "ticklers"
that Kanzius uses in his
watergas process -- and
also in his cancer cure,
which in phase one lab animal experiments has had sensational results
of curing 100% of the tumors in the lab animals.
We point out the fundamental mechanism directly seen and included by
Dirac: a sharp little pulse gradient of positive energy in the local
vacuum pops out some electrons from the
Dirac Sea, leaving behind
Such a hole is a negative mass-energy electron (the
"dark matter" our
astrophysicists are so desperately seeking), which as a special kind
of source charge continually emits negative-energy photons, so that
the associated EM fields are negative-energy EM fields (the so-called
"dark energy" our
astrophysicists are also so desperately seeking).
So these negative mass-energy electrons and their associated negative
energy EM fields there in the "tickled"
adding negative energy (both mass-energy and EM energy) to the vacuum.
With this more advanced understanding of what an
"observable" actually is,
then when we now introduce a bit of "sharp little gradient tickling"
the vacuum in a local area, per
P.A.M. Dirac, that tickling will produce negative energies
in that tickled vacuum as well. And that means that we are adding in
"negative probabilities" into that bubbling structure (say, a
container of water, in each water molecule structure) so that the
entire bubble structure for the water molecule starts "backing back
down" its ongoing creation chain -- in short, it starts "unhappening"
at its "highest positive energy end".
If we just use a gross pattern of tickling, we get "overall"
unhappening, so the last and highest positive energy thing that made
the water molecule possible -- i.e., the OH bond positive probability
-- now has much-reduced overall probability. The net probability is
the summation of (1) the usual positive probability and (2) the added
negative probability due to tickling.
Hence statistically the water molecules in the tickled area start
"falling apart" as their OH bonds now have much less probability, and
so they just start "unhappening" statistically as their OH bonds start
So intermixed bubbles of H2 and O2 gas (from those molecules whose OH
bond "unhappened") begin appearing throughout the vacuum-tickled
"water". But these mixtures are not very combustible or explosive
because in that altered (tickled) region now it is very difficult to
form the OH bond.
Aha! But if we then pipe the resulting gas bubbles out of that local
tickled-vacuum region -- i.e., out of the water container itself-- and
a few inches away and into the combustion chamber of a nearby
combustion engine, then the vacuum in that combustion chamber is
"normal" and not being "tickled". Hence the OH bond is back in its
full normal probability, and so the mix of O2 and H2 will burn and
power the engine, giving no exhaust except water vapor.
This is the real secret of watergas, as rigorously shown by
John Kanzius and the
results verified by a renowned water chemist. But neither of them seem
to realize the actual mechanism involved. This is also the secret of
Dr. Kanzius tremendous
new cancer cure, now proceeding toward human testing by a leading
cancer research institute.
In the late 1920s and very early 1930s, the physicists glimpsed the
startling characteristics introduced by negative vacuum energy, and
were scared right out of their minds.
Negative energy occurs in the
Schrodinger equation and in Dirac's relativistic electron theory, and
so there it is in the very foundations of physics. But in
abject fear, the leaders of the scientific community such as
beat the daylights out of Dirac,
and ruthlessly ripped negative
energy out of all of physics possible to do it in. (As
Dirac pointed out, you cannot get negative energy out of quantum
mechanics, because it occurs easily and naturally by mere sharp little
Tickling the local vacuum with little pulses of sharp gradient sound
energy -- as in sonofusion -- also pops out electrons from the local
Sea and produces
the same type negative mass energy holes and their associated negative
mass-energy fields in the tickled vacuum.
So the ability to (1) "unhappen" things like the OH bond in water
molecules, (2) "unhappen" the cancerous growth in a region of normal
flesh, (3) "unhappen" the lattice bonds in titanium so that the
titanium liquefies at room temperature without heating and can then be
"cold-molded" in very large and thick forms such as submarine hulls (a
Soviet production process for some decades), and (4) produce certain
nuclear fusion bonds in a fluid by use of tickling by sonobubbles so
that sonofusion occurs, etc.
The eventual startling applications are unlimited, as comprehensive
research develops and extends the technology. We shall be able to
"unhappen" essentially any disease quickly and cheaply, by assembling
the exactly required "tickling pattern" to "unhappen" that specific
disease in the diseased body. We will also be able to turn anything
into anything else (such as turning the present hordes of carbon
wastes from coal plants directly into gasoline with no intermediate
processing, etc. We will be able to clean up the present horrendous
nuclear wastes and the vast amount of carbon-containing wastes from
The ability to directly engineer any and all "happening" bubble-sets,
or any particular part of any of them, is the "final physics" because
it leads to the final goal of physics and science itself: the ability
to directly engineer observable physical reality itself, at will. The
fact that we are radically departing from the accepted notions of
"brute force tearing things apart" such as electrolysis, and instead
we are letting the all-powerful and all-pervasive vacuum do all the
functioning for us, is a very radical and total departure from the
present "mechanical energy based" physics concepts and practice of
physics and chemistry.
So in abject panic at their glimpse of this "monstrous" and
unthinkable portent, in 1934 the leaders of the physics community
brutally mutilated and murdered physics by ripping out negative energy
vacuum effects, totally arbitrarily.
As Hotson stated:
"I think if one had to point to a single place where science went
profoundly and permanently off the track, it would be 1934 and the
emasculation of Dirac’s equation." [D. L. Hotson,
"Dirac’s Equation and the
Part I, New Energy, Issue 43, 2002, pp. 1-20. Quote is from p. 1.]
http://openseti.org/Docs/HotsonPart1.pdf . See also D. L. Hotson,
"Dirac’s Equation and the
Part II, New Energy, Issue 44, 2002, pp. 1-24. Available at
Well, as their horrifying glimpse had revealed to the scientific
leaders in the late 1920s and very early 1930s, if one uses a mix of
positive and negative energy in a local vacuum, then one can easily
and directly engineer physical reality itself in that local region --
any observable physical reality at all. Literally (eventually) one
will be able to do whatever one wishes with physical reality of any
To give it a name, I call this process
since one is directly engineering the ongoing creative bubble-set of
an observable entity, by not only "happening" the statistical
processes involved in it but also by selectively "unhappening" the
entire set or selected parts of it.
Today, thank goodness, some very fine physicists -- most notably Dan Solomon (Rauland-Borg Corporation, Skokie, IL), have published very rigorous papers in the leading
physics literature, pointing out that
negative vacuum energy
indeed does occur irrevocably, and it cannot be just "discarded" from
physics if one is to follow scientific method rather than pure dogma.
Simply Google the appropriate references, or check out a typical
reference such as Dan Solomon, "Some new results concerning the vacuum
in Dirac’s hole theory,"
Physica Scripta, Vol. 74, 2006, p. 117–122. Also check out the many
other references at:
So if the scientific community will at long last act scientifically,
and remove its previous absolutely erroneous removal of negative
energy from physics, humankind will have at last entered into the
"final physics" and the direct engineering of physical reality itself,
Hopefully "precursor engineering"
will be born this year in our universities and scientific community,
and at long last we will be able to fuel our cars, clean up the
biosphere, clean up nuclear wastes, clean up carbon wastes supposedly
to be "sequestered" somewhere and somehow, etc. And we will begin to
be able to cure any and all diseases that presently so ravage
And if we can also begin to avoid the typical "man's inhumanity to his
fellow human", then we shall enter into a new and truly golden age of
plenty, and of freedom from poverty, illness, [and the] pollution of
our biosphere, etc.
Thomas Eugene BeardenSource: http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/011409.htm
(January 12, 2009)