October 22nd, 2009 by Steven Aftergood
The
total number of invention secrecy orders that the U.S. government
imposed on patent applications rose again this year, reaching 5,081 by
the end of last month, the highest figure since 1996.
Under the Invention Secrecy Act
of 1951, U.S. government agencies may restrict the disclosure of a
patent application whenever its publication is deemed “detrimental to
the national security.” In Fiscal Year 2009, 103 new secrecy orders
were issued, while 45 existing orders were rescinded. The overall
number of orders in effect increased by about 1% over the year before,
according to statistics from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office that were released to Secrecy News under the Freedom of Information Act.
The most vexing secrecy orders, known as “John Doe” secrecy orders,
are those that are imposed on private inventors who are not government
contractors so that the government has no property interest in the
invention. In Fiscal Year 2009, there were 21 new John Doe secrecy
orders, according to the latest statistics.
An argument could be made that secrecy orders in such cases are
infringements on an inventor’s First Amendment rights, but such an
argument has never been tested in court.
In general, however, challenges or complaints concerning the
operation of the patent secrecy system seem to be rare. Most secrecy
orders originate at defense agencies, with the U.S. Navy in the lead
this year with 39. (The National Security Agency issued 12 secrecy
orders in FY 2009.) In such cases, the most likely customers for the
inventions are the military agencies themselves, not commercial
enterprises, and so the secrecy orders may have no adverse impact on
the inventors. For other resources on invention secrecy, see here.
Source: http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2009/10/invention_secrecy_2009.html