No, because the physicists already know that the Standard Model is not correct:
Physicists already know that even if they find the Higgs boson, the Standard Model is already incorrect — some aspects of the mass of particles called neutrinos do not quite fit the model — in addition to being incomplete, given that it provides no clues as to what dark matter or dark energy are. In addition to giving answers on how to correct the Standard Model, discoveries at the LHC and the Tevatron will mean big changes in physicists’ understanding of how particles interact with each other, where they came from, and where they get their mass. Even confirmation of the absence — non-existence — of the Higgs boson will be extremely significant, because it will mean that physicists will need to rethink a lot of theories and assumptions.
http://tamunews.tamu.edu/2010/11/04/large-hadron-collider-seeking-the-nature-of-nature/
Well, such conclusion of the physicists is not a surprise.
At least for those ones that have knowledge of some misfires of the
Standard Model.
Besides, several experiments already
have pointed out that something is missing in the Standard Model, and we
can mention Don Borghi and Conte-Pieralice experiments, which have
shown that neutrons can be formed from the agglutination of protons and
electrons at low energy. According to the Standard Model, neutrons
cannot be formed by protons+electrons at low energy.
We
also can mention the cold fusion experiments, and in particular that
made by Pamela Mosier-Boss in 2009, where she used the plastic CR-39 so
that to show that neutrons are emitted in her experiment, above the
background of neutrons.
According to foundations of the Standard Model, cold fusion is impossible to occur.
But what is missing in the Standard Model ?
Let's
respond such question remembering a strange solution proposed by Murray
Gell-Mann. According to the Standard Model, the decay of two particles
would have to occur through the strong force. But their decay is
electromagnetic. So, the two particles violate the rules of the
Standard Model.
Murray Gell-Mann solved the problem by
proposing the Strangeness, according to which the two particles can
violate the rules of the Standard Model. So, actually he solved
nothing. He merely proposed a name for the strange phenomenon.
According
to Quantum Ring Theory, what is missing in the Standard Model is the
spin-fusion: there are reactions in which a lepton (as for instance the
electron) loses its spin, when it interacts with hadrons (as for
instance the proton). When the proton and the electron form the
neutron, the electron loses its spin, through such
spin-fusion phenomenon: into the neutron's structure, the electron
behaves like a boson.
When the electron is captured by the
proton and they form a neutron, the electron loses its spin and an
antineutrino is emitted, in order that the total angular momentum is
kept (before and after the capture).
Such phenonenon also
occurs with other particles. In the book Quantum Ring Theory it is
shown that several reactions of high energy (that cannot explained from
the Standard Model concepts) are explained by considering the
spin-fusion.
Also, in the case of the Strangeness, the
two particles violate the rules of the Standard Model because each one
of them has into its structure a lepton tied to a meson by the
spin-fusion. That's why their decay is electromagnetic, similar to the
neutron's decay, which is electromagnetic too. In the neutron's decay,
when the electron leaves out its partnership with the proton, the
electron gets again its spin (and in such process a neutrino is emitted,
in order that the total angular momentum -before and after de decay
- is kept).
The Standard Model is not wrong. It is incomplete, because there is need to incorporate the spin-fusion in it.
