On 14th, 2011, at 10:21 PM , Mr. Paul Segers posted a comment in the Andrea Rossi's blog (Journal of Nuclear Physics), in the article A detailed Qualitative Approach to the Cold Fusion Nuclear Reactions of H/Ni
Mr. Paul wrote in the end of his comment:
4. What amends (if any) do you think should be made for those who have been discredited by the scientific “community”, and who have devoted their careers and lives to LENR/COLD FUSION (I understand why you shy away from the branding). The case of the Fleischmann–Pons claims come to mind, and I sincerely hope you can put all of these “scientists” to shame within a year.
On the same day I have posted a
reply to Mr. Paul, where I explained that Fleischmann and Pons were
screwed by the media and the scientific community. Their cold fusion
works, but the physicists undertook all the efforts so that to descredit
their experiment (for instance, by claiming that there was error in the
And I also explained that Fleischmann and Pons technology is replicated in Jean-Louis Naudin website.
difference with Rossi-Focardi experiment lies in the fact that
Fleischmann-Pons technology is not so easy to replicate, and it is most
expensive, since palladium is not cheap.
finished my posting telling to Paul that “the scientific community in
the future will ask for forgiveness to Fleischmann and Pons in the same
way as the Church apologized to Galileo”
My comment was not approved by Andrea Rossi: he did not publish my reply to Paul.
In 28 June-2011 I have posted the following comment in his blog:
Dear Dr. Andrea Rossi
spite of you have a theory which perhaps can explain your cold fusion
experiment with no need of a New Physics, however there are many other
experiments that require a New Physics. For instance, we may mention
among others the hydrino hydrides produced by BlackLight Power Inc,
which existence does not fit to the concepts of Quantum Mechanics.
2008 I wrote a new book entitled THE MISSED U-TURN, in which I explain
for the layman the foundations and some models proposed in my Quantum
Ring Theory (published in 2006).
2009 the Telesio Galilei Academy of Sciences has intended to publish
this new book of mine, by having a parternship with a London publishing
Unfortunatelly the publishing house had troubles in the 2009 crisis in Europe, and the book was not published.
my English is not so good, the grammar and syntax of the book was
reviewed by Dr. Jeremy Dunning-Davies, President of the Telesio Galilei
A version in
Portuguese was published in Brazil in the end of 2008, with the title “A
EVOLUÇÃO DA MECÃNICA QUANTICA- o duelo Schrodinger vs Heisenberg”
Now I am looking for a publisher again, because:
1- Cold fusion is becoming hot again, and it will be warmer in 2012, when the E-Cat will be working worldwide.
Besides, some new experiments (published after 2009) have corroborated
my Quantum Ring Theory - as for instance the experiment published in
Science in June-2011, which brought down the Bohr's Complementarity,
predicted in my theory.
It seems it's the best time to try again to publish my book.
So, I would like to know if you can write some few words in the back cover of my book THE MISSED U-TURN.
months before to die in 2004, Eugene Mallove intended to publish my
Quantum Ring Theory by the Infinite Energy Press. He made some comments
on my work, as for instance:
1- “Guglinski has intriguing theories”
2- “I'm aware that Guglinski's hydrogen model has connection with the Mills hydrine hydrides”
A comment from you, Dr. Rossi, may help me to find a publisher for my book.
this new book I also have incorporated some new discoveries which I
made after the publication of Quantum Ring Theory, in 2006.
instance, I write in the end of this book on the question of how
gravity can help cold fusion occurrence (because from the models of my
theory the gravity interactions have the same magnitude of the
Andrea Rossi did not approve my comment: he did not publish it.
In June 26th, 2011 at 1:42 PM , Mr. Martin wrote:
"Dear mr Rossi,
Today is was thinking about your invention. I am very curious how it feels
when someone realises he invented something that can change the world.
What was your reaction at first time realising that?
In 29 June-2011 I have posted the following reply to Mr. Martin:
Dear Mr. Martin
the E-Cat invented by Andrea Rossi produces more energy then it consumes. This is known in Physics as perpetual motion.
most people believe that perpetual motion is a novelty, but it is not.
More than 100 years ago Nicola Tesla already stated that perpetual
motion is possible. He even had proposed in the beggining of the 20th
Century to develop a techonogy based on such sort of energy exploration.
people know Tesla's coils, and believe that it's only an ordinary
phenomenon explaiend by current theories of Physics. It's wrong. Tesla's
coil cannot be explained by the current theories. Tesla's coils show
that theories of Modern Physics are wrong.
there is perpetual motion only according to current Modern Physics,
because the current theories consider closed systems, where it is
difficult to detect the flow of energy comming from outside of the
to a New Physics to be developed based on the aether hypothesis, the
Rossi-Focardi reactor (and many others engine, as for instance the
magnetic motors) actually are not perpetual motion, because the energy
comes from an unknown source yet (perhaps from the Sun; for instance,
Tesla supposed that the radioactivity of the radioactivy elements is
caused by the Sun).
ideas had many followers along the 20th, all them trying to make
reality his dream: to supply humanity with cheap energy. Among them,
Fleischmann and Pons, who in 1989 published a paper showing cold fusion
occurrence into an electrolytic cell. They had developed a cold fusion
technology based on palladium.
Rossi is another follower of Tesla's idea. Rossi has developed a new
cold fusion techonology based on Ni-H, cheaper and more efficient than
that developed by Fleischmann and Pons.
now, finally, after more than 100 years, Andrea Rossi will realize the
Tesla's dream of supplying our planet with cheap energy for everybody.
Again, Andrea Rossi did not publish that my reply to Mr. Martin
seems Andrea Rossi is trying to convince everybody that he is a new
Galileo. And he feels unconfortable when someone shows him he is not.
Some people are not satisfied with the gift they receive from God. They want more than God think they deserve