ZPEnergy.com - Is H.E. Puthoff deliberately misleading others in the field of ZPE?

Robert A. Patterson writes: Let me start by stating that I am pro-free-energy and somewhat biased when it comes to the work of H.E. Puthoff i.e. having conducted my own research vs. relying on others to devise a method of tapping the vacuum for its residual energy densities, that said:

There are 3.2 MeV.'s of recoverable energy in Fusion

Conversely there are 200 MeV.'s of recoverable energy in Fission

H. E. Puthoff is working with resanent cavities, offtimes referred to as open vacuum cavities which may be optically pumped, thereby inductively coupling atoms into the cavity system.

Cavity atoms experience significant squeezing under the influence of strong driving fields. These squeezing effects are intrinsically connected to the polarization of dressed state populations by tuning the cavity appropriately close to the atomic transition frequency we may induce a "non-vanishing inversion" of the dressed-state's setting the standard for optimal conditions for atomic squeezing.

In the case of an isolated two-level atom, the most important damping mechanism is a spontaneous radiative decay. This mechanism is associated with the "coupling of the atom" to the "zero point electromagnetic fields". Empty-cavity transmission resonances are found to "split" in the presence of the 'atoms', and under these conditions, the cavities temporal responses are found to be "oscillatory". These effects may be viewed as a manifestation of a vacuum-field Rabi splitting or as a simple consequence of the linear absorption and dispersion of the intercavity atoms.

Note the term "split" is synonymous with "Fission" which may occur in properly tuned Atom-Coupled Optical Waveguide Systems.

Is H.E. Puthoff deliberately misleading others in the field of ZPE?

Wouldn't you?

Robert A. Patterson
Reverse Engineering Specialist
Gravitics Among The Ancients
http://ancientgravitics.tripod.com/