 |
There are currently, 146 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
|
Cold Fusion 101 at MIT ... and more
|
|
From Dr. Peter Gluck's Ego Out Blog: INFO AND STARTING THE +LENR+ BABEL COLLECTION
1) A traditional Cold Fusion teaching event
Tomorrow it starts, a very important, very LENR traditional event: Cold Fusion 101 at MIT for 2015: Introduction to excess power in Fleischmann-Pons experiments. A very rich, interesting program presenting the process that gave us the certainty of existence of cold fusion-excess heat:
"The Cold Fusion 101: Introduction to Excess Power in Fleischmann-Pons Experiments course will run again on the campus of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) over the IAP winter break Tuesday through Friday Jan. 20-23, 2015. Professor Peter Hagelstein of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT, and Dr. Mitchell Swartz of JET Energy, Inc., will present the course with topics such as:
|
Posted by vlad on Tuesday, January 20, 2015 @ 00:38:54 EST (1206 reads)
(Read More... | 2191 bytes more | 1 comment | Score: 0)
|
|
|
US 500.000 prize for any nuclear physicist who solves a puzzle
|
|
WGUGLINSKI writes: I will register notarized that will pay the US 500.000 prize for a nuclear physicists who presents a solution for the puzzle explained ahead, via any current nuclear model which works with the principles of the Standard Nuclear Physics.
The puzzle:
1- There is no Coulomb repulsion between proton and neutron
2- There is a background of neutrons in the environment
3- There is attraction proton-neutron via the strong force
more...
|
Posted by vlad on Sunday, January 11, 2015 @ 18:32:43 EST (394 reads)
(Read More... | 1671 bytes more | 1 comment | Score: 1)
|
|
|
Is Rossi using David Hudson patented ORMES procedure for his powder?
|
|
kadamose writes: Rossi is a fraud and I can prove it. First, let me be clear: Rossi's e-cat technology is not in question - it is very real. Unfortunately, however, Rossi is still the same fraud that he was twenty years ago. He is just a fraud who has been paying attention, while everyone else looked the other way or was asleep. I, however, am not falling for it and can see through his clever ruse. Before I delve further into this, one needs to ask why Rossi will not let the white nickel powder, which is the heart of the e-cat, be analyzed by scientists and the public at large? Is he afraid that someone will copy and replicate it, or is there another far more sinister reason? It turns out there is a reason that he does not want it analyzed - at any cost - and it is the sole reason why he is being so secretive about it.
|
|
A New Physics Theory of Life
|
|
 Art Hunter writes: While reading this link, it had Cold fusion stamped all over it. What do you think?
From QuataMagazine.org: By:
Natalie Wolchover/ January 22, 2014
Jeremy England, a 31-year-old physicist at MIT, thinks he has found the underlying physics driving the origin and evolution of life.
Why does life exist?
Popular hypotheses credit a primordial soup, a bolt of lightning and a colossal stroke of luck. But if a provocative new theory is correct, luck may have little to do with it. Instead, according to the physicist proposing the idea, the origin and subsequent evolution of life follow from the fundamental laws of nature and “should be as unsurprising as rocks rolling downhill.”
|
Posted by vlad on Sunday, December 14, 2014 @ 02:51:13 EST (711 reads)
(Read More... | 2188 bytes more | comments? | Score: 5)
|
|
|
Aether Denser than Matter
|
|
Via Keelynet.com: It's an interesting inversion ...[re aether being denser than 'matter'] - ie we 'know' that atoms have electrons etc orbiting them, I heard its a circum pole to pole rotation , making a figure 8, not a straight out circular [but thats an aside as I got no source to quote for it [but recall it was from some group that builds vacuum/aether engines].
Aether being denser than matter gave rise to the Hole Theory which is the counterpart to the Electron Theory, electrons supposedly traveling from + to - and holes traveling from - to +....Aether is, in reality, a 2-way street. Deep in my KeelyNet manuscript copies, I remember some learned researcher saying that the Aether is 960,000 times denser than steel. The Aether is denser, not in the sense that it is harder, as in steel hardness, but that the Aether is finer grained, and "grained" means that the basic Anu seems to be 960,000 times smaller than a steel atom.
|
Posted by vlad on Sunday, December 14, 2014 @ 02:38:05 EST (541 reads)
(Read More... | 6695 bytes more | comments? | Score: 0)
|
|
|
2 Futures Can Explain Time's Mysterious Past
|
|
New theories suggest the big bang was not the beginning, and that we may live in the past of a parallel universe
/December 8, 2014/
By Lee Billings/ Scientific American
Physicists have a problem with time.
Whether through Newton’s gravitation, Maxwell’s electrodynamics, Einstein’s special and general relativity or quantum mechanics, all the equations that best describe our universe work perfectly if time flows forward or backward.
Of course the world we experience is entirely different. The universe is expanding, not contracting. Stars emit light rather than absorb it, and radioactive atoms decay rather than reassemble. Omelets don’t transform back to unbroken eggs and cigarettes never coalesce from smoke and ashes. We remember the past, not the future, and we grow old and decrepit, not young and rejuvenated. For us, time has a clear and irreversible direction. It flies forward like a missile, equations be damned.
|
Posted by vlad on Saturday, December 13, 2014 @ 23:49:28 EST (996 reads)
(Read More... | 2421 bytes more | 1 comment | Score: 0)
|
|
|
What Andre Rossi is afraid of?
|
|
WGUGLINSKI writes: In his blog Journal of Nuclear Physics Andrea Rossi is trying to transmit wrong information to the readers, when the subject is about the nature of the reactions occurring within his eCat.
For instance, in December 12th Frank Acland posted the following comment:
* Frank Acland
December 12th, 2014 at 10:46 PM
Dear Andrea,
I am sorry I cannot understand Italian — because you apparently had an interesting interview with Salvo Mandarà today.
I have been reading some translated reports of the interview and
wonder if you could confirm whether these translated points are correct:
|
Posted by vlad on Saturday, December 13, 2014 @ 21:31:03 EST (1655 reads)
(Read More... | 8939 bytes more | 4 comments | Score: 0)
|
|
 My good old friend and mentor Dr. Peter Gluck, who runs the excellent blog about the philosophy of science of LENR, " Ego Out", has doubted that I would ever mention on ZPEnergy his recent "provocative and heretic writing", titled "The six pillars of LENR+". I have a tremendous respect for this man, not just because he is a very smart compatriot of mine, but also because he genuinely believes in the truth of this potential huge scientific breakthrough (which was simply named cold fusion when it first emerged), and because his love for it is addictive and hopefully contagious! Here is Peter's new paradigm: "Cold Fusion, we love you and we will help you to grow up, to become healthy and strong and productive. Now you are just an unhappy little weakling but you are able to change and improve tremendously!" and his proposed Motto: "Other sciences simply are, LENR must become. (A principle of Otherness )" |
Posted by vlad on Friday, December 12, 2014 @ 02:20:33 EST (1047 reads)
(Read More... | 1714 bytes more | comments? | Score: 0)
|
|
|
Report on E-Cat by universities of Bologna, Uppsala, and Royal Institute of Tech
|
|
WGUGLINSKI writes: On the report Observation of abundant heat production from a reactor device and of isotopic changes in the fuel, by Giuseppe Levi , Evelyn Foschi , and Hanno Essén
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/LuganoReportSubmit.pdf
In the item 9. Summary and concluding remarks at the page 30, the authors write:
”In summary, the performance of the E-Cat reactor is remarkable.
We have a device giving heat energy compatible with nuclear
transformations, but it operates at low energy and gives neither nuclear
radioactive waste nor emits radiation. From basic general knowledge in nuclear physics this should not be possible.
Nevertheless we have to relate to the fact that the experimental
results from our test show heat production beyond chemical burning, and
that the E-Cat fuel undergoes nuclear transformations. It is certainly
most unsatisfying that these results so far have no convincing
theoretical explanation, but the experimental results cannot be dismissed or ignored just because of lack of theoretical understanding. ”
————————————————————————–
COMMNENT:
|
Posted by vlad on Wednesday, October 22, 2014 @ 02:24:59 EDT (1455 reads)
(Read More... | 14518 bytes more | 7 comments | Score: 0)
|
|
Posted by vlad on Friday, September 12, 2014 @ 01:57:00 EDT (1416 reads)
(Read More... | 65753 bytes more | 1 comment | Score: 0)
|
|
|
DR. RANDELL MILLS ABOUT COLD FUSION
|
|
From Peter Gluck's blog Ego Out: Yesterday, the fastest and best Rossi info source has published a paper entitled: “HYDRINOS AND LENR EXISTING IN PERFECT HARMONY” (http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/09/02/hydrinos-and-lenr-existing-in-perfect-harmony-guest-post/). It is still vividly discussed there.
I have considered that the most authorized person to evaluate the ideas of this paper is Dr. Randell Mills himself.
Randy Mills is, in my opinion a very remarkable scientist and a great
personality; we had corresponded starting from 1991. My best friend Mike
Carrell and I have constantly and empathically followed the development
of Randy’s ideas and technologies.
|
Posted by vlad on Thursday, September 04, 2014 @ 02:40:18 EDT (2417 reads)
(Read More... | 2278 bytes more | 1 comment | Score: 0)
|
|
|
DEFINITIVE BREAKDOWN OF THE QUANTUM MECHANICS
|
|
WGUGLINSKI writes: The new experiment published by the journal Nature in the end of 2014
represents the definitive breakdown of Quantum Mechanics, as explained
ahead.
1) How photons are emitted by atoms according to Quantum Mechanics
According to the Quantum Mechanics, into the electrosphere of the
atoms the electrons do not travel the space between two levels n and
n+1. According to the theory, the electron disappears in the level n,
and it appears instantaneously in the level n+1, without traveling along
the space which separate the two levels.
The reason why the electron does not travel the space between the two
levels in the atom is easy to be understood, and it is consequence of
the assumptions adopted in the development of the Quantum Mechanics, as
seeing ahead :
|
|
How God wrote eCat in a mysterious way
|
|
WGUGLINSKI writes: Ahead is a discussion between Andrea Rossi, Wlad, Mr. Joe, Mr. JR, and Mr. Curiosone, in the Rossi's blog Journal of Nuclear Physics.
|
Posted by vlad on Tuesday, August 12, 2014 @ 23:54:59 EDT (1945 reads)
(Read More... | 46826 bytes more | 1 comment | Score: 1)
|
|
|
Theorists propose way to amplify force of vacuum fluctuations
|
|
 From ScienceDaily: Boosting the force of empty space: Theorists propose way to amplify force of vacuum fluctuations
Source: Vienna University of Technology, TU Vienna
Summary: Vacuum fluctuations may be among the most counter-intuitive phenomena of
quantum physics. Theorists have now proposed a way to amplify their
force. The researchers believe that their proposed enhancement of the
power of vacuum fluctuations can have profound implications for
understanding Casimir and Van der Waals forces and it may even be used
for applications in quantum information processing and other emerging
quantum technologies.
|
|
LENR- THEORIES OR PRINCIPLES?
|
|
Dr. Peter Gluck writes in Ego Out, his science blog: For LENR, lots of theories, few principles.
Semantics is not quite an exact science; words have different and somewhat fluid meanings. A congress of philosophers could not tell us what are the differences between a theory and a principle however when we are moving in a familiar territory of knowledge where theories abound and principles are not considered relevant & important- we can tell the ones from the others quite easily- just by looking at them; remember the pragmatic definition of pornography. “I know it when I see it”- principle.
In the VUCA world of LENR, there can be intermediary states or hybrids of theories and principles. Theories are knowledge-oriented, more precise and detailed than principles, while principles are action-oriented, implying change.
Theories are interesting and passive, principles active and useful- as a somewhat general rule.
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
| Sunday, July 20, 2014 | | · | The Proton Radius Prediction and Gravitational Control |
| Sunday, June 08, 2014 | | · | Magnetism induced by vacuum polarization at the gold-monolayer interface |
| · | Upcoming two books by W. Guglinski: |
| Tuesday, June 03, 2014 | | · | An Expensive Scientific Blunder? |
| Thursday, May 29, 2014 | | · | The Electron-Positron Sea |
| Monday, May 12, 2014 | | · | Experiments with Coler magnetic current apparatus |
| Saturday, April 26, 2014 | | · | Nikkei Reports Mitsubishi to Use LENRs To Clean Nuclear Waste |
| Saturday, April 19, 2014 | | · | KickStarter projet for a new book about Ball Lightning Technology |
| Monday, April 14, 2014 | | · | Final failure of the nuclear models of the Standard Nuclear Physics |
| Thursday, April 10, 2014 | | · | Einstein, the greatest crackpot of the Physics |
| Sunday, March 30, 2014 | | · | Engineering Physical Reality |
| Tuesday, March 11, 2014 | | · | Unsolved Modern Physics puzzles solved in Quantum Ring Theory |
| Sunday, February 16, 2014 | | · | Space energy generator -- Paramahansa Tewari |
| Monday, February 10, 2014 | | · | Encouraging Signs on the Path to Fusion |
| Sunday, January 26, 2014 | | · | The Centrifugal Force Controversy and its Connection with Zero-Point Energy |
| Saturday, January 11, 2014 | | · | PLAGIARISM: law suit against Nature, European Physical Journal, Argonne Nat Lab |
| Wednesday, December 18, 2013 | | · | Future Energy eNews - Dec 2013 |
| Wednesday, December 11, 2013 | | · | Missed z-axis in current nuclear models |
| Saturday, December 07, 2013 | | · | COLD FUSION, WHAT NOW? |
| Tuesday, November 26, 2013 | | · | Heisenberg’s phantasmagoric scientific method applied to Classical Nuclear Physi |
Older Articles
| |
It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities are wrong.-- Voltaire
| |
|
|
How does the quantum entanglement works?
I used do not believe in the existence of the quantum entanglement. In my book Quantum Ring Theory, by considering my model of the photon, I had proposed a new interpretation for the Alain Aspect experiment, without the need of considering the entanglement.
But a new experiment published in the journal Nature does not allow any doubt on its existence: