 |
There are currently, 131 guest(s) and 1 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
|
Extraction of clean and cheap energy from vacuum
|
|
Extraction of clean and cheap energy from vacuum
Authors: Xingliu Jiang ; Dept. of Phys., Beihang Univ., Beijing, China ; Xiaoping Zhou ; Weiming Peng
“Nature abhors vacuum.” Based on theory of the zero point energy, broken symmetry, and tip effect, useful energy and power has been extracted from quantum vacuum experimentally. The experimental results of anomalous nuclear reaction reported by Jiang, Bockris, Miley and Mizuno, et al. challenge the current atomic model. It appears that there are situations in which nuclei split open at the stimulus only chemical energies. A high energy concentration in the double layer on the cathode surface is observed with the existence of anomalous nuclear transmutation in electrolytic cells. A model of vortex dynamics based on the zero point energy, Casimir effect and torsion field with tip-effect and related nonlinear processes is proposed by Xingliu Jiang to account for the anomalies of the experimental phenomena.
|
|
The Standard Nuclear Physics is dead
|
|
WGUGLINSKI writes: Deleted from Andrea Rossi blog Journal of Nuclear Physics;
The Standard Nuclear Physics is dead
Dear Joe, Between 2005 and 2010, I participated in physical forums on the Internet,
where I used to show that the Standard Nuclear Physics has many
incoherences, and the current nuclear models are denied by many
experiments. No one among those models is able to explain all the
nuclear properties of the nuclei.
The physicists used to answer me with a speech in this way:
|
|
Current Science - Special Section: Low Energy Nuclear Reactions
|
|
 The latest Current Science Issue Vol. 108, No. 4, 25 February 2015, has a Special Section on Low Energy Nuclear Reactions with 34 papers in pdf format you can download for free (list below; click on PDF).
Preface. Low energy nuclear reactions
A quarter century has gone by since Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons, two chemistry professors from the University of Utah, USA, made a ‘historic’ announcement at a press conference in Salt Lake City in March 1989, where they claimed that they had observed sporadic episodes of massive amounts of ‘excess heat’, over and above what is electrically put into the electrolytic cell. They suggested that in their experiments, the Pd rod which was deployed as cathode got heavily ‘loaded’ with deuterium (D), thus forming PdD, from the LiOD electrolytic solution during electrolysis. They went on to postulate that the observed large amounts of ‘excess heat’, which is far beyond the chemical energy available, must be attributed to the occurrence of some sort of nuclear fusion reactions between the deuterons, d, embedded within the Pd metal matrix. This claimed occurrence of fusion reactions at room temperature soon came to be dubbed as ‘cold fusion (CF)’ ....
|
Posted by vlad on Wednesday, February 25, 2015 @ 02:01:59 EST (855 reads)
(Read More... | 44925 bytes more | 1 comment | Score: 0)
|
|
|
Proton's radius to be measured by MUSE Project (2015-2016)
|
|
WGUGLINSKI writes: From: wladimirguglinski
Subject: the puzzle of the proton's radius
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 16:09:59 -0200
To: Dr. Randolf Pohl, Max-Planck-Institute of Quantum Optics, Garching, Germany; Dr. Aldo Antognini, Institute for Particle Physics (IPP), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Prof. Dr. Theodor W. Hänsch, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich; Dr. Franz Kottmann, Laboratory for Particle Physics, Paul Scherrer Institut Villigen PSI, Switzerland; Prof. Dr. Thomas Graf, Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Strahlwerkzeuge, Stuttgart, Germany; Karsten Schuhmann, Institute for Particle Physics (IPP), ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Dr. Paul Knowles, Département de physique, Université de Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
Dear Professors
Regarding the puzzle of the proton's radius, in the page of the Paul Scherrer Institute it is written the following:
|
Posted by vlad on Wednesday, February 18, 2015 @ 00:44:52 EST (977 reads)
(Read More... | 4046 bytes more | comments? | Score: 0)
|
|
|
Why is Andrea Rossi betraying the scientific method?
|
|
WGUGLINSKI writes: The Rossi's blog Journal of Nuclear Physics published in the end of January-2015 my paper Aether Structure for unification between gravity and electromagnetism.
In the page of Comments Andrea posted the following:
Therefore, Andrea Rossi had started a discussion.
|
Posted by vlad on Thursday, February 12, 2015 @ 23:46:16 EST (1331 reads)
(Read More... | 64521 bytes more | 9 comments | Score: 0)
|
|
|
The Vacuum Catastrophe - Zero-Point Energy
|
|
Video published by Suspicious0bservers.org. : The Vacuum Catastrophe - Zero-Point Energy
Here is more science based background on the amount of energy in the vacuum (Jordan Maclay/Quantum Fields LLC):
"...If you have a hot body in equilibrium with its surroundings, it is radiating
and reabsorbing photons (quantized bundles of electromagnetic radiation) of all
wavelengths. The energy of a photon of frequency f is Planck's constant h times
the frequency hf . The energy distribution of these photons is given by the
Planck blackbody equation. If you imagine cooling the body and surroundings to
absolute zero, you would find that a temperature independent electromagnetic
field remained. This electromagnetic field, which is always present even if no
matter or charged particles are present and the temperature is absolute zero,
represents the lowest state of the electromagnetic field. The
corresponding fluctuating electromagnetic field is called the zero-point (ZP)
field of the electromagnetic field. The presence of this zero-point field is
predicted by QED (Quantum Electrodynamics).
|
|
Cold Fusion 101 at MIT ... and more
|
|
From Dr. Peter Gluck's Ego Out Blog: INFO AND STARTING THE +LENR+ BABEL COLLECTION
1) A traditional Cold Fusion teaching event
Tomorrow it starts, a very important, very LENR traditional event: Cold Fusion 101 at MIT for 2015: Introduction to excess power in Fleischmann-Pons experiments. A very rich, interesting program presenting the process that gave us the certainty of existence of cold fusion-excess heat:
"The Cold Fusion 101: Introduction to Excess Power in Fleischmann-Pons Experiments course will run again on the campus of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) over the IAP winter break Tuesday through Friday Jan. 20-23, 2015. Professor Peter Hagelstein of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT, and Dr. Mitchell Swartz of JET Energy, Inc., will present the course with topics such as:
|
Posted by vlad on Tuesday, January 20, 2015 @ 00:38:54 EST (2911 reads)
(Read More... | 2191 bytes more | 1 comment | Score: 0)
|
|
|
US 500.000 prize for any nuclear physicist who solves a puzzle
|
|
WGUGLINSKI writes: I will register notarized that will pay the US 500.000 prize for a nuclear physicists who presents a solution for the puzzle explained ahead, via any current nuclear model which works with the principles of the Standard Nuclear Physics.
The puzzle:
1- There is no Coulomb repulsion between proton and neutron
2- There is a background of neutrons in the environment
3- There is attraction proton-neutron via the strong force
more...
|
Posted by vlad on Sunday, January 11, 2015 @ 18:32:43 EST (1383 reads)
(Read More... | 1671 bytes more | 1 comment | Score: 1)
|
|
|
Is Rossi using David Hudson patented ORMES procedure for his powder?
|
|
kadamose writes: Rossi is a fraud and I can prove it. First, let me be clear: Rossi's e-cat technology is not in question - it is very real. Unfortunately, however, Rossi is still the same fraud that he was twenty years ago. He is just a fraud who has been paying attention, while everyone else looked the other way or was asleep. I, however, am not falling for it and can see through his clever ruse. Before I delve further into this, one needs to ask why Rossi will not let the white nickel powder, which is the heart of the e-cat, be analyzed by scientists and the public at large? Is he afraid that someone will copy and replicate it, or is there another far more sinister reason? It turns out there is a reason that he does not want it analyzed - at any cost - and it is the sole reason why he is being so secretive about it.
|
|
A New Physics Theory of Life
|
|
 Art Hunter writes: While reading this link, it had Cold fusion stamped all over it. What do you think?
From QuataMagazine.org: By:
Natalie Wolchover/ January 22, 2014
Jeremy England, a 31-year-old physicist at MIT, thinks he has found the underlying physics driving the origin and evolution of life.
Why does life exist?
Popular hypotheses credit a primordial soup, a bolt of lightning and a colossal stroke of luck. But if a provocative new theory is correct, luck may have little to do with it. Instead, according to the physicist proposing the idea, the origin and subsequent evolution of life follow from the fundamental laws of nature and “should be as unsurprising as rocks rolling downhill.”
|
Posted by vlad on Sunday, December 14, 2014 @ 02:51:13 EST (1250 reads)
(Read More... | 2188 bytes more | comments? | Score: 5)
|
|
|
Aether Denser than Matter
|
|
Via Keelynet.com: It's an interesting inversion ...[re aether being denser than 'matter'] - ie we 'know' that atoms have electrons etc orbiting them, I heard its a circum pole to pole rotation , making a figure 8, not a straight out circular [but thats an aside as I got no source to quote for it [but recall it was from some group that builds vacuum/aether engines].
Aether being denser than matter gave rise to the Hole Theory which is the counterpart to the Electron Theory, electrons supposedly traveling from + to - and holes traveling from - to +....Aether is, in reality, a 2-way street. Deep in my KeelyNet manuscript copies, I remember some learned researcher saying that the Aether is 960,000 times denser than steel. The Aether is denser, not in the sense that it is harder, as in steel hardness, but that the Aether is finer grained, and "grained" means that the basic Anu seems to be 960,000 times smaller than a steel atom.
|
Posted by vlad on Sunday, December 14, 2014 @ 02:38:05 EST (757 reads)
(Read More... | 6695 bytes more | comments? | Score: 0)
|
|
|
2 Futures Can Explain Time's Mysterious Past
|
|
New theories suggest the big bang was not the beginning, and that we may live in the past of a parallel universe
/December 8, 2014/
By Lee Billings/ Scientific American
Physicists have a problem with time.
Whether through Newton’s gravitation, Maxwell’s electrodynamics, Einstein’s special and general relativity or quantum mechanics, all the equations that best describe our universe work perfectly if time flows forward or backward.
Of course the world we experience is entirely different. The universe is expanding, not contracting. Stars emit light rather than absorb it, and radioactive atoms decay rather than reassemble. Omelets don’t transform back to unbroken eggs and cigarettes never coalesce from smoke and ashes. We remember the past, not the future, and we grow old and decrepit, not young and rejuvenated. For us, time has a clear and irreversible direction. It flies forward like a missile, equations be damned.
|
Posted by vlad on Saturday, December 13, 2014 @ 23:49:28 EST (1203 reads)
(Read More... | 2421 bytes more | 1 comment | Score: 0)
|
|
|
What Andre Rossi is afraid of?
|
|
WGUGLINSKI writes: In his blog Journal of Nuclear Physics Andrea Rossi is trying to transmit wrong information to the readers, when the subject is about the nature of the reactions occurring within his eCat.
For instance, in December 12th Frank Acland posted the following comment:
* Frank Acland
December 12th, 2014 at 10:46 PM
Dear Andrea,
I am sorry I cannot understand Italian — because you apparently had an interesting interview with Salvo Mandarà today.
I have been reading some translated reports of the interview and
wonder if you could confirm whether these translated points are correct:
|
Posted by vlad on Saturday, December 13, 2014 @ 21:31:03 EST (1899 reads)
(Read More... | 8939 bytes more | 4 comments | Score: 0)
|
|
 My good old friend and mentor Dr. Peter Gluck, who runs the excellent blog about the philosophy of science of LENR, " Ego Out", has doubted that I would ever mention on ZPEnergy his recent "provocative and heretic writing", titled "The six pillars of LENR+". I have a tremendous respect for this man, not just because he is a very smart compatriot of mine, but also because he genuinely believes in the truth of this potential huge scientific breakthrough (which was simply named cold fusion when it first emerged), and because his love for it is addictive and hopefully contagious! Here is Peter's new paradigm: "Cold Fusion, we love you and we will help you to grow up, to become healthy and strong and productive. Now you are just an unhappy little weakling but you are able to change and improve tremendously!" and his proposed Motto: "Other sciences simply are, LENR must become. (A principle of Otherness )" |
Posted by vlad on Friday, December 12, 2014 @ 02:20:33 EST (1215 reads)
(Read More... | 1714 bytes more | comments? | Score: 0)
|
|
|
Report on E-Cat by universities of Bologna, Uppsala, and Royal Institute of Tech
|
|
WGUGLINSKI writes: On the report Observation of abundant heat production from a reactor device and of isotopic changes in the fuel, by Giuseppe Levi , Evelyn Foschi , and Hanno Essén
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/LuganoReportSubmit.pdf
In the item 9. Summary and concluding remarks at the page 30, the authors write:
”In summary, the performance of the E-Cat reactor is remarkable.
We have a device giving heat energy compatible with nuclear
transformations, but it operates at low energy and gives neither nuclear
radioactive waste nor emits radiation. From basic general knowledge in nuclear physics this should not be possible.
Nevertheless we have to relate to the fact that the experimental
results from our test show heat production beyond chemical burning, and
that the E-Cat fuel undergoes nuclear transformations. It is certainly
most unsatisfying that these results so far have no convincing
theoretical explanation, but the experimental results cannot be dismissed or ignored just because of lack of theoretical understanding. ”
————————————————————————–
COMMNENT:
|
Posted by vlad on Wednesday, October 22, 2014 @ 02:24:59 EDT (1731 reads)
(Read More... | 14518 bytes more | 7 comments | Score: 0)
|
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
| Friday, September 12, 2014 | | · | Discussion on entanglement in the Andrea Rossi blog |
| Thursday, September 04, 2014 | | · | DR. RANDELL MILLS ABOUT COLD FUSION |
| Thursday, August 14, 2014 | | · | DEFINITIVE BREAKDOWN OF THE QUANTUM MECHANICS |
| Tuesday, August 12, 2014 | | · | How God wrote eCat in a mysterious way |
| Wednesday, July 30, 2014 | | · | Theorists propose way to amplify force of vacuum fluctuations |
| Sunday, July 27, 2014 | | · | LENR- THEORIES OR PRINCIPLES? |
| Sunday, July 20, 2014 | | · | The Proton Radius Prediction and Gravitational Control |
| Sunday, June 08, 2014 | | · | Magnetism induced by vacuum polarization at the gold-monolayer interface |
| · | Upcoming two books by W. Guglinski: |
| Tuesday, June 03, 2014 | | · | An Expensive Scientific Blunder? |
| Thursday, May 29, 2014 | | · | The Electron-Positron Sea |
| Monday, May 12, 2014 | | · | Experiments with Coler magnetic current apparatus |
| Saturday, April 26, 2014 | | · | Nikkei Reports Mitsubishi to Use LENRs To Clean Nuclear Waste |
| Saturday, April 19, 2014 | | · | KickStarter projet for a new book about Ball Lightning Technology |
| Monday, April 14, 2014 | | · | Final failure of the nuclear models of the Standard Nuclear Physics |
| Thursday, April 10, 2014 | | · | Einstein, the greatest crackpot of the Physics |
| Sunday, March 30, 2014 | | · | Engineering Physical Reality |
| Tuesday, March 11, 2014 | | · | Unsolved Modern Physics puzzles solved in Quantum Ring Theory |
| Sunday, February 16, 2014 | | · | Space energy generator -- Paramahansa Tewari |
| Monday, February 10, 2014 | | · | Encouraging Signs on the Path to Fusion |
Older Articles
| |
Since the days of revelation, in fact, the same four corrupting errors have been made over and over again: submission to faulty and unworthy authority; submission to what it was customary to believe; submission to the prejudices of the mob; and worst of all, concealment of ignorance by false show of unheld knowledge, for no better reason than pride. -- Roger Bacon
| |
|
|
Wladimir Guglinski:
You are very welcome.
Obviously, as I already wrote on this blog, I do not agree with your Aether theory and the theory we are elaborating regarding the so called Rossi Effect is totally different. My solid opinion is that “Aether” does not exist. Nevertheless, I respect your work and the sincere enthusiasm you put in it.
Warm Regards,
A.R.