ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 74 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (March 25, 2017 - March 26, 2017) ANP Conference 2017
  • (July 7, 2017 - July 9, 2017) Energy Science & Technology Conference
  • (July 28, 2017 - July 29, 2017) COFE-9

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Chava Energy

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    Energy Science

    Energy21

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    Interstellar Technologies

    JLN Labs

    KeelyNet

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    The Orion Proj.

    Panacea-BOCAF

    QVac_Eng

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    Tom Bearden's Page

    Unlimited electric energy

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    Alternative Energy News
    KeelyNet_News
    NextEnergyNews
    PESWiki/News
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    Energy2000
    Free_Energy
    Greenglow
    JLNLabs
    KeelyNet
    NuEnergy
    OverUnity
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Sweet-VTA
    Tapten
    Tomorrow-energy
    Vortex
    Magazine Sites
    Distributed Energy
    Electrifying Times
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine
    radioioAmbient

    Current Poll Results

    Should DOE start a Breakthrough Energy Physics program (like NASA’s BPP)?

    Yes91 %91 %91 % 91.74% (111)
    No8 %8 %8 % 8.26% (10)

    Total Votes: 121


    [ Voting Booth | Other Polls ]

    Last 5 Surveys at ZPEnergy.com

     What FE tech will win the FE race (0 votes)

     Release of FE techs will impact millions of jobs world-wide: (143 votes)

     The pursue of the idea of "free-energy" is: (102 votes)

     If you could support just one of them, which one would it be? (216 votes)

     As a businessman, to put money in (FE tech), you would need: (658 votes)


    "Should DOE start a Breakthrough Energy Physics program (like NASA’s BPP)?" | Login/Create an Account | 4 comments
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Should DOE start a Breakthrough Energy Physics program ( (Score: 1)
    by Rob (rob@zpenergy.com) on Thursday, July 03, 2003 @ 01:58:11 EDT
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com

    It should be interesting to hear comments from both the "Yes" and "No" side.

    Q for the "Yes" side: Did you answer "Yes" because you have empirical knowledge of possibility in "energy breakthroughs" ?

    Q for the "No" side: Did you answer "No" because you know that it is impossible and it is a waste of governmental funds?

    /Rob


    Re: Should DOE start a Breakthrough Energy Physics program ( (Score: 1)
    by ElectroDynaCat on Saturday, July 05, 2003 @ 16:08:59 EDT
    (User Info | Send a Message)

    If NASA runs the program like it runs everything else, I'd much rather they leave the field completely


    Re: Should DOE start a Breakthrough Energy Physics program ( (Score: 0)
    by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 08, 2003 @ 15:41:35 EDT

    NO!

    Assuming compartmentalization is the reason DOE would not be aware of the known systems they would eventually become aware that a black budget cell has done it - a matter of redundancy.

    NO!

    The folks at BPP thought they could get somewhere with their in-house scientists and totally dismissed the only true source of novel thinking - wackos like me.

    Until these academic elitists accept that the only way to progress is through the integration of mad scientists and regular boring specialists, they will never succeed, besides why would DOE eliminate its purpose?


     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.