ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 141 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry
American Antigravity
Closeminded Science
EarthTech
ECW E-Cat World
Innoplaza
Integrity Research Institute
New Energy Movement
New Energy Times
Panacea-BOCAF
RexResearch
Science Hobbyist
T. Bearden Mirror Site
USPTO
Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Genesis Strikes Again
Posted on Monday, January 24, 2005 @ 20:14:21 UTC by vlad

Devices technophile writes: Genesis puts up "test data" on one of their early prototypes. The problem is that whoever is writing this stuff still doesn't know the difference between a Watt and a Watt hour (power vs energy). The result is a table of "data" which is mostly gibberish, such as "404.05% More Gas Produced Per Watt Consumed". How exactly do you consume a Watt?

http://www.genesis-scientific.org/technology_test.htm


 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Devices
· News by vlad
Most read story about Devices:
Overunity magnet motor released !


Article Rating
Average Score: 4
Votes: 2


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Genesis Strikes Again" | Login/Create an Account | 8 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Genesis Strikes Again (Score: 1)
by sparks35 on Monday, January 24, 2005 @ 23:27:20 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
consume
con-sume'
(ken-soom')
1. devour; eat; destroy.
2. use up; spend, as time.
------------------------------------------------
I see no problem describing a watt as being consumed.
------------------------------------------------

gibberish
gib'ber.ish
(jib'er-ish)
inarticulate talk; nonsence.
-------------------------------------------------
The test data is not inarticulate;
and is not nonsence.
-------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the Update technophile. But please let's study it a bit before making conclusions.





Re: Genesis Strikes Again (Score: 1)
by ElectroDynaCat on Tuesday, January 25, 2005 @ 13:11:16 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Exactly why 99.9% of the devices promoted by the spurious get shot down in scientific review. Fantastic claims, fuzzy details, bad math.



Re: Genesis Strikes Again (Score: 1)
by sparks35 on Tuesday, January 25, 2005 @ 22:42:48 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
technophile, and others,

Thanks for the Electricity 101 Education regarding Watts (power) vs. Watt/Hours (energy). I do believe I understand the difference; and YES, would expect Genesis (with all their grand claims)
to post test results that are, at the very least, free of elementary errors.

Genesis seems to be able to maintain a great Website. (over many months). But, Yes..their
technical credibility is lacking.
-----------------------------------------------------
Speaking of numbers...ElectroDynaCat...?

WHERE DO U GET THE... "99.9% of the devices promoted by the spurious get shot down in scientific review. Fantastic claims, fuzzy details, bad math."??

Did you just pull 99.9% out of your hat???
----------------------------------------------------

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.