Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 624 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		Super Cosmos finished Posted on Monday, August 22, 2005 @ 20:55:00 UTC by vlad Anonymous writes: From: Jack Sarfatti Date: August 19, 2005 7:15:36 PM PDT Subject: This is BIT from IT: Super Cosmos is here! bcc Hi If you are getting this it's either because you have contributed to the book, or are cited, or have expressed interest in its content. For a few days only you can download the final copy of the book and its front and back covers at: http://qedcorp.com/APS/cover.jpg http://qedcorp.com/APS/galley.pdf 14.4 megs The book should be on Amazon and all the usual places by mid-October This book is not a popular book although it has popular sections that can be understood by the general public. It has the math. It's really meant for physics students and for intelligence people. ....My critique of the Haisch ZPF theory agrees with Nobel Prize physicist Shelly Glashow's and with Coventry University's Ian Peterson's. You can read it in a slightly uncorrected galley at [see above links]. A shorter tech version 2 megs is at: http://qedcorp.com/APS/zpf2005.pdf There is a Rev Mod Phys article on "quantum friction" that shows that the drag below is at best a small correction to the mass. The Higgs coherence mechanism explains the origin of inertia. The Haisch theory is to quote Shelly Glashow "not even wrong". It is a waste of USG taxpayer's money to support that line of inquiry IMHO. Any theory based only on the EM field is clearly incomplete at best.   Login Nickname Password Security Code: Type Security Code Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. Related Links · More about Science · News by vlad Most read story about Science: 100 miles on 4 ounces of water? Article Rating Average Score: 2.5 Votes: 2 Please take a second and vote for this article: Options   Printer Friendly "Super Cosmos finished" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment | Search Discussion The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: Super Cosmos finished (Score: 1) by Guitarfox on Tuesday, August 23, 2005 @ 02:58:05 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) Correct me if I'm mistaken. This so-called "Super cosmo" seems to be a little bit cliche to me. The author quotes from all the big-names in physics and science fictions, making his own conclusion, and throws it at me without any scientific experiment for proof. That's my thoughts after 30 pages or so into this book. The idea in ZPE somewhat makes sense to me. I had to admit that I'm only a little software engineer with only university level of physics and some crap like that to back up my understanding of all these; but I can't really see the author's line of reasoning that goes around in circle and selp-proofing his points. For example, page 10 of the book states "the dark energy has negative pressure and dark matter has positive pressure.." is that derived from quantum physics or his imagination? I was hoping to see some cleverly designed experiment that really shows what he is stating before arriving at the conclusion of the "warp-drive." I have to admit that reading this book is really entertaining, but I am just not convinced beyond reasonable doubt that everything he said or most of what he said is true... It's just me though.. Or does this book really meant to entertain? I really need a second opinion from the clear-headed fellows here please... @_@

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.