From Tom Bearden's selected correspondence: http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/081706a.htm
Subject: RE: Flynn Research
question
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:02:26 -0500
Hi Dave,
The MEG uses the freely, self-evoked Aharonov-Bohm effect
to first condition
its local vacuum with excess EM energy (uncurled A-potential energy),
then
triggers that excited vacuum to cause it to freely generate E-field
energy
pulses back into the MEG core, from all directions, via the known
equation
E = - dA/dt. Thus the MEG is an asymmetric Maxwellian system of that
class
of Maxwellian systems arbitrarily discarded by Lorentz in 1892, and
still
arbitrarily discarded by all electrical engineering departments and
textbooks. Check my new paper on my website, which contains detailed
but simple
drawings of exactly how this "vacuum engineering" effect is produced
freely
by the MEG, using the well-known Aharonov-Bohm effect. There are more
than
20,000 papers in the hard physics literature dealing with the
Aharonov-Bohm
effect, its extension to the Berry phase, its further extension to the
geometric phase, etc. One does not have to prove the Aharonov-Bohm
effect
itself and what it does; instead, one just has to prove that the
system does
evoke the effect. It's just that no one before seems to have thought
of
applying the AB effect to an electrical power system.
Also note in my new paper that physicists have now independently
proven that
the Aharonov-Bohm effect can and often does occur in the
nanocrystalline
material used in the MEG's core. References are cited in the paper.
Physicists also have proven that the Aharonov-Bohm effect can and does
occur
in layered crystalline structures, again such as the MEG uses in its
core.
So the AB effect's occurrence in precisely such materials and layered
construction has been resoundingly and independently proven, including
experimentally.
That process of first conditioning the external vacuum to contain
extra EM
energy, then triggering that excited vacuum to furnish excess
environmental
EM energy back to the MEG, is quite different from the process used in
the
Flynn invention.
In thermodynamics, if one's system receives free, usable, excess
energy from
its active environment, then it is an asymmetric system permitted to
obtain
COP>1.0 performance, even though its efficiency is always less than
100%.
That is, such a system can permissibly output more energy and useful
work
than the energy that the operator himself pays to input. The excess
required
energy input is freely received from the active environment.
A common example of an analogous conventional system is a home heat
pump. It
has an overall efficiency of only 50%, and thus wastes (as losses)
half of
all the energy input to it, from whatever source. But it receives so
much
excess "nearly free" heat energy extracted from its environment, that
from
the unwasted remainder it still outputs three to four times as much
heat
energy as the electrical energy that the operator inputs and pays the
power
company for. That's precisely why we use heat pumps in the winter to
heat
our homes, rather than using resistance heaters. The other advantage,
of
course, is that in hot summer the heat pump can extract heat from the
house
and exhaust it to the atmosphere, thus "heating" the outside while
"cooling
down" the inside.
It takes an asymmetrical Maxwellian system to do COP>1.0
electromagnetically. The MEG is just such an asymmetric Maxwellian
system,
using its activated vacuum environment for the required excess energy
input.
Unless a Maxwellian system does something to violate the standard
Lorentz
symmetry condition, it cannot produce COP>1.0 since it would be a
symmetrical system self-enforcing COP < 1.0.
Best wishes,
Tom Bearden
======================Original message:
I don't see anything on Flynn's website claiming the Flynn generator
provides "free" energy, so why (according to Wikipedia) is there a
conflict with him and the MEG patent?
Regards
Dave |