(End of excerpt)
Adam Trombly (Speech): Climate
Change Factors, Ozone Layer Crisis, and Zero Point Energy
Technologies (Transcript, slightly edited from
http://www.repp.org/discussion/green-power/200205/msg00011.html,
of Adam Trombly’s speech to the 1988 International Tesla Society Symposium,
Colorado
Springs, Colorado. Trombly provides additional details regarding Tesla's
murder by painful poisoning, likely by the United
States Government. It is reprinted in its entirety because I believe
Trombly's message concerning energy in 2007 is even more urgent and troubling.
Gary Vesperman)
As this is the last speech of the conference here, I’m
going to give an overview of the development of zero point theory and I’m going
to try and take into account all of you have been very patient...
The
basic principle which we are obviously here to address, was originally
elaborated by Nikola Tesla. The sense that Nikola Tesla conveyed of existence
was, if not unique, then certainly it was profoundly inspired, not so much by
initial analysis but by initial vision.
We have become a rather left
brain biased society, an analytically biased society. As a result of this
analytical bias we tend to refute or deny the validity of intuitive jumps or
intuitive leaps and insight.
Tesla was an extraordinarily prolific
inventor obviously, but in addition to being a prolific inventor, he explored
very thoroughly, for his time, the dimension of the psyche. And I think that
perhaps too often we tend to forget that he himself claimed that the source of
his inspiration was not conventional.
He saw what he built, and then he
described it to a draftsman, and built it. The draftsman was his interface with
substance. To consider that when he was riding in his carriage or his Pierce
Arrow here in Colorado
Springs , not too far from where we are right now, he would often see
devices in their totality, spontaneously. ... is quite remarkable. (I myself
have seen descriptions with drawings of some of Tesla’s complicated machines.
Genuinely amazing! Gary Vesperman)
When you see something in its
totality, it tends to have a different meaning than if you tried to put the
pieces of the universe back together to arrive at a conclusion. Tesla insisted
that he rested in the conclusion in his own psyche. I think this is very
important. Tesla was not an analytical apologist; he was not somebody who made
gestures to the scientific community to make himself necessarily acceptable in
his time. What was acceptable was that he produced. The means by which he
produced were often unacceptable, especially in the last couple of
decades.
Therefore, we heard a lot about Thomas Edison, and we heard a
lot in our education about just about everybody else except Nikola Tesla. The
reason I’m sure this Society exists is this left a vacuum, a huge vacuum that is
not merely filled by the acknowledgment of Nikola Tesla, but by the
acknowledgment of the function of a human being, the function of a being not
being polarized to the left hemisphere, but balanced to the two hemispheres of
the brain, in other words vision coupled with analysis.
In the
development of our generator, which we originally called the “Acyclic Closed
Magnetic Generator,” vision was implicitly necessary to arrive at our
conclusions. Basically we had to work from very little information. There were
very few explorers in the field, and we had to begin to consider that perhaps
the way we considered reality actually is fundamentally incorrect, that
fundamental cornerstones such as the law of induction, for example, that
particular cornerstone was not necessarily as we believed it to be.
What stimulated me, and I’ve said this before, since 1980, was the
recognition that certain astrophysical phenomena express energies in excess of
what the apparent input is. This is a very common thing in astrophysics, whether
you’re talking about quasi-stellar objects, or whether you’re talking about the
planet Jupiter.
When we first found out that the planet Jupiter was
developing a looped current between itself and the moon Io, Jupiter was called,
in a paper published by a Goddard scientist at NASA,
a “Homopolar generator.”
They tried to rationalize that the relative
motion between the moon Io and Jupiter was actually responsible for the current
that we could measure by virtue of its magnetic flux tube as tested by satellite
probe. But when you went through some very simple calculations, you found that
was not true.
So we decided that we would look into the matter of
“Homopolar” generation itself – the history, who came up with it, as Bruce
DePalma and others have pointed out. Even though Michael
Faraday did an experiment on December 26th, 1831, in which he co-rotated
a magnet with a copper disk and measured a current output. Even though he had
done that experiment, his own law of induction tended to ignore that
fact.
A professor with the Royal Society in London
, a professor of science history, told me that the original Faraday cage was
designed not to keep electromagnetic noise out, but to keep Michael in. You see
he played with a substance we call mercury, and in those days there was very
little appreciation for the toxicity of mercury. And so Faraday apparently
suffered from a form of dementia, which we’ve heard very little about because
it’s one of the cornerstones of the building we have been living in, in
science.
We found out after we found Faraday’s diary, after we found the
citations of the experiments that he had done, that there was a gentleman by the
name of Bruce DePalma in Santa
Barbara, California, who had suggested that on the basis of the
co-rotation of a magnet and a conductor, which we were at that time
contemplating ourselves, it might be possible to generate more energy out from
the generator than input in.
I must say that my initial response to that
was probably not as skeptical as some people might be when they heard such a
thing, because in the fields of astronomy and astrophysics it is not uncommon,
not uncommon at all to find an object that is obviously exceeding what we “know”
to be its thermonuclear, or any other form, it’s exceeding the output that it
could possibly have by thermonuclear means, by fusion, by fission, by anything
we normally consider.
And so, because we had seen that already in space
there was this planet Jupiter clearly being a demonstration of what we initially
considered to be an anomaly. Clearly putting out three times as much energy as
it could possibly be receiving from the sun. We decided to reduce to practice a
form of generator with the intention of practical commercial use, and through
various good fortunes we arrived at funding.
We actually, for this
field in those days, got substantial funding. And as a result of that work, we
applied for a patent in 1980 which was, as many of you know, denied by the U.S.
Patent Office as being implausible to the extreme. The statement was to the
effect that, “This device could not even generate electricity.” It wasn’t that
it couldn’t generate electricity in excess of input, it was that the machine
couldn’t generate electricity at all. The patent officer himself was, as many of
us, as all of us basically were unfamiliar, he being totally unfamiliar, with
the fact that you could co-rotate a magnet with a copper disc, even though we
had provided him with a copy of a page from Faraday’s diary. He actually
suggested that the diary notes might have been something created expo
factos.
My initial naiveté in entering this field was rapidly
destroyed.
We felt that if we could produce a practical, commercial,
viable unit, then the world would be very excited indeed. And what we discovered
instead was we were dealing with a profound level of inertia; inertia in a frame
of reference we didn’t normally consider.
Economic inertia,
intellectual stasis and dogma. Certainly the explorers in this field, over time,
whether it’s myself, or Bruce DePalma, or Tewari or going back to Moray, Tesla,
Hubble. These people all discovered this inertia. It is an astonishing thing
when you first encounter it. It is irrational. It says that no, indeed the Earth
is the center and everything revolves around it. And the moons around Jupiter
couldn’t possibly be doing that what you say.
Galileo wasn’t vindicated
by the Catholic Church until 1984. If we took that many centuries to acknowledge
zero point vacuum fluctuation- based technologies, we will all be dead. And
that’s the sobering realization that I have come to over the last five
years.
Buckminster Fuller was a huge influence in my life. I met him
when I was sixteen years old and largely because of his influence I wasn’t
permanently lost in space; lost in the theoretical level of things. And
therefore, when I began to encounter this resistance he said something that was
very important to me. He said that every new idea, every new technology, every
major breakthrough, has an inevitable period of gestation. He said you must
learn to be patient. He had experienced profound resistance, as you may know, to
various ideas that he had in the thirties.
I think that what we are
really seeing is not the resistance or inertia imposed upon this technology, but
instead a resistance to a fundamental shift in perception about the Universe
itself.
We have tended to describe ourselves in discrete terms, as
encapsulated beings, with rather defined boundary layers, both temporally and
spatially.
We’re born and we die. The boundaries of our body are the
boundaries of our being. Inspiration has a difficult time entering into a closed
bottle. Where would it come from? Where would it appear?
How could
Nikola Tesla say he got ideas from space? He was considered a very eccentric and
crazy man as a result of his statements. People point out that he always had all
these napkins piled up next to his plate. But by the end of his life, people had
forgotten that his vision is what is powering these lights. And if we had
continued with his vision, we wouldn’t have a fossil fuel economy today. And
J.P.
Morgan and Rockefeller and a number of other individuals would not have
amassed extraordinary fortunes on the basis of that fossil fuel
economy.
I think this is extremely important for us to understand
because when Nikola Tesla’s vision was denied, a part of our own vision was
denied. Just as when Galileo’s vision was denied. The fact of the matter is that
as we sit or stand here, a field of energy pervades us. This even relatively
conventional physicists like John Archibald Wheeler stated in a 1962 article in
the Review of Modern Physics. “Energy has a mass equivalence of ten to the
ninety-fourth power grams per centimeter.” You just need to look in the
literature. That ninety-fourth power grams per cubic centimeter represents a
rather coherent state. It represents something that we could very easily call a
continuum.
But because of the taboo against the idea that you might
perhaps be able to get water from the well of space, or what people call
“perpetual motion”, there has not been a sense of any kind of practical
application.
Once in a seminar, well over a decade ago, I asked a
question I found was extraordinarily taboo, and I said, “Why can’t we tap into
this field?” It had been established in the literature in Europe
by Philip Sipolan (sp?) since 1951 and 1952, that not only did the fluctuation
field exist, a fluctuation field of extraordinary energy equivalence. And that
the vacuum field was bias able; that it was polarizable.
The
polarizablity of a vacuum, fluctuation background, I believe is the essential
issue, and a very simple issue indeed that we need to really
consider.
David Deutch in 1982 explored briefly in a book called
“General Relativity,” on Einstein’s centenary, which was edited by Hawking,
considered very briefly the fact that not only is the vacuum polarizable in
terms of density, but that an ideal theoretical situation density polarization
could asymmetrically approach infinite density and asymmetrically approach
negative energy density. That means that within the vacuum fluctuation itself,
stress can be created. That means that the vortical dynamic that Tewari speaks
of is really not that difficult to imagine, because you have fluctuation density
that wishes to remain isotropic, or uniformly distributed, disrupted, polarized,
in a curved manifold, and that vacuum density once polarized wants to relax from
that stress back into a more isotropic state.
Anybody who studies
vortical physics, fluid dynamics, plasma dynamics knows that there is no greater
stress than that by which we invoke a vortical momentum. And therefore it is not
hard to imagine, if we simply consider the fact that we are dealing with a
medium of this extraordinary density. It is not hard to imagine or even begin to
feel that just by simply biasing this field in a rotating cylinder or perhaps in
an oscillating circuit, by biasing this field correctly, we can precipitate
vortical momentum.
Now we may only precipitate a quasi-electron. In the
vacuum fluctuation of space, their production is occurring all the time. In a
bias environment however, where an electrical potential exists, that
quasi-electron, instead of annihilating with its anti-particle, might indeed be
distracted along the potential and find its way into what we refer to very
blithely as manifestation.
It doesn’t necessarily take giga-electron-
volts for this to occur. And that’s why Tewari, DePalma, myself and others speak
of the generation of power from space.
We need to very simply and
seriously consider that it’s already in the literature. It isn’t just in the
literature of the fringe; It’s in the literature now even of Physical Review
since 1975. Review of Modern Physics, since 1962. And in the European literature
since the 1950’s. It’s a remarkable thing that because of the bias against
so-called “perpetual motion”, or so-called, “free energy”, that nobody seems to
want to extrapolate what is implicitly obvious.
The atom itself can then
be seen as a dynamic modification of field space. Only a dynamic modification of
field space, with no quality of stasis what so ever.
Harold Putoff, in
his May 15th, 1987 article in Physical Review, pointed out that in order for the
hydrogen atom in its ground state not to collapse, it had to be absorbing energy
from the fluctuation background. In this moment. This is not something that
happened at T equals zero – before the Big Bang.
This is something
happening at this moment, real time present context, now with every atom and
molecule that we see configured before us. It is happening right now.
It
is wonderful to have Dr. Puthoff describe this energy in terms of the Bohr atom.
It is implicit that the electron orbit dissipates energy. If we consider that to
be a resonant shell with no locatable density bias, then it still pertains
because the atom itself, even in its ground state, resonates in
space.
We have a picture, that we got when we were young, that says a
thing is solid, even though particle physicists are telling us that nothing is
solid, and while that’s all very fascinating on Nova television, we still have a
picture that persists. Can an atom, existing in certain states of polarization
and stress, perhaps become a conduit drawing upon the energy of space? A
transducer in a certain light.
Obviously it must be, or else it couldn’t
exist. The electron itself must be spontaneously appearing out of the background
field. If it was not spontaneously persisting then we have to invoke the
somewhat Neanderthal concept that everything had to start at a certain moment.
And because we have embraced this new cosmology of the Big Bang in the last
couple of decades, we have some real problems.
This is not the best
forum to go into this in great detail, but I will say this - the Universe is
clumpy. That’s a term that is used frequently in astrophysics to describe the
fact that mass is not uniformly or isotropically distributed. It is simply not.
On a large-scale basis with models that have assimilated data from observatories
from all over the world, especially over the last few years, we have seen that
the Universe we observe is indeed clumpy. It is in fact concentrated in a way
that cannot be the artifact of a Big Bang.
Now that’s a bold statement.
Alfven (Swiss Nobel Laureate), famous for Alfven waves, has come up with an
extraordinarily beautiful description of the plasma dynamics of space. And so
far, interesting to note, although he was considered to be a complete heretic
when he came out with his theory, every single observation we have made from
space with satellite probes, has confirmed his predictions. I think it very
important that everybody here who is interested in the reality in which we
adhere, become familiar with either the esoteric or the exoteric level of
Alfven’s work. It’s just beginning to appear in the literature. I think Discover
magazine had a rather prosaic presentation of it, but it was also quite good.
(June ‘88; the “Big Bang Never Happened.”)
If there was not a Big Bang,
where things conveniently began with a single event, then we need to begin to
consider the fact that something that has a gram equivalence of about a gram per
cubic centimeter, which is our body, must be a rather insignificant modification
of a field that has a potential of ten to the ninety-fourth power/grams per
cubic centimeter.
This impacts the way in which we live together; it
impacts the way in which we live with the Earth itself.
I had not
initially planned today to show some slides from the NASA
program, but because this is a cap speech at the end of the day, I feel that it
might be very useful to digress for a moment and observe the rather catastrophic
impact that the very concept of discrete encapsulation has had upon human
existence and the Earth itself.
And I would suggest to you, after
considerable study of the subject, which is now becoming accepted in the
lterature worldwide, that we cannot sustain the dynamic of human existence any
longer unless we begin to transcend the arbitrary, subjective boundaries that we
presume to be true. Whether these boundaries are about ourselves, or all
phenomena of manifest existence, until we begin to move beyond this
anal-retentive state, in which everything must be particularized. Everything
being particularized, leaves Humpty Dumpty.
We will never be able to
re-assemble existence.
As Fuller pointed out to me at an early age,
“existence is already implicitly whole, we break it into parts only in our minds
only.”
It is already unified whether or not we have a unified field
theory or not. And as Einstein suggested at his last series of lectures at the
Advanced Institute at Princeton , “perhaps we can only appreciate the unified
field by entering a conscious relationship with it.”
Again, this is
something that would not have been at all contrary to what Nikola Tesla
proposed, and yet some people would be embarrassed to say it.
I think we
need to very succinctly consider that we cannot continue to burn fossil fuels on
this planet, and that we really haven’t found anything to do with our nuclear
waste.
And that the appearance of bona-fide third party confirmation of
the generation of energy from space is a significant event in history. It’s not
significant because it will make a few men popular, or unpopular. It’s not
significant because it will somehow create a minor change in our concept of
being. It’s significant because it represents a dramatic shift that we
desperately need to embrace.
Right now we are sitting at the edge of an
unprecedented human catastrophe on this planet. A friend of mine, Sayed Sayed
(sp?), at Texas
A&M who has for twenty years been a climatologist, in an elegant experiment
recently carried out in Antarctica
, has shown clearly that if we lose between 6% and 7% more of the remaining
stratospheric ozone the phytoplankton in the oceans will die.
The
phytoplankton in our oceans contribute 50% of the oxygen that we enjoy on this
planet. It is extremely important to point out that prior to the appearance of
photosynthesizing biomass; oxygen was a trace gas which basically appeared
through the natural transitions of H2O.
We simply cannot afford to lose
any more oxygen than we already have. At this moment, literally hundreds of
millions of internal combustion engines are running. A six-ylinder engine, of
normal displacement, consumes eight hundred thousand (800,000) cubic centimeters
of oxygen per hour. This transforms the breathable oxygen into combustion
by-products, an entire spectrum of combustion products.
In the last
twenty years, in Africa alone, we have destroyed 64% of the biomass ground
cover. In the last twenty years! This is a United
Nations Environmental Program figure, confirmed by satellite and manned
space flight telemetry. (Remember that Trombly gave this speech in 1988. Perhaps
these gloomy figures and reports are likely to be even worse now in 2007? Gary
Vesperman)
Also, in the last twenty years we have consumed 29% of the
photosynthesizing ground cover in Central and South
America . In the last twenty years! You cannot consume oxygen at the same
time you consume the factories that metabolize carbon dioxide and return oxygen
to us, and expect to have a sustainable environment. Because as oxygen tensions
decrease even a few percent in the troposphere, ozone tensions decrease
disproportionately. This is because there is a column of oxygen and other gases
that rises from the biosphere to the troposphere and then to the stratosphere.
It is on the basis of the mixture of these gases, that we have ozone in the
atmosphere.
I would suggest that we can not afford to wait to demand
that serious money is applied to this research, Federal money. We need this to
happen desperately and we need this to happen immediately. And for those of us
who feel that we can be blasé, and wait and wait and wait until somehow this
becomes acceptable, (the implementation of this new kind of technology) let me
just say that if we think we can wait; we’re sorely deluded.
You wonder
why there is a drought in Ethiopia
. You hear in Time magazine that the so-called scientists can’t figure out why
there is a drought. Well, Ethiopia
at the beginning of the century was covered by 43% forest. Ethiopia
today is covered by less than 4% forest. How is the hydraulic cycle supposed to
maintain itself? (Too much deforestation may be a contributor to the drought
that has now consumed half of the United
States and is still spreading. USA Today,
early June, 2007. Gary Vesperman)
This at first, this entire
consideration at first, seemed to be in rather left field of the consideration
of energy generation. But, as I began to explore it further and further and
lectured around the world, I began to discover that most of the human race has
been entirely uninformed. Some people have suggested this is rather
conspiratorial. The slides you are going to see in just a minute have been
available, some of them, for several years. We finally got a few of them on
CNN
December 25th (1987?)
I think when you see them you’re going to realize
why they are so significant. And as always I would like to thank Richard
Underwood of NASA,
now retired, for providing these images. They are in the public domain, but
anyone who has tried to get photographic data from the NASA
space flight program, especially during the Reagan Administration, will find
that it is a very difficult thing to do. As a matter of fact, most of the
infrared photography is now stored at AMES , and you can’t get into the
building. Even though this material is not classified, the building itself is
off limits.
I would like to have the lights dimmed, and I would like to
show these slides and then we can go on from there. We can discuss in more
detail about this and other things.
This is the way clouds are supposed
to look over the rain forest. These are healthy clouds. These clouds are
appearing over the Northern Congo
area and this photograph was taken in the mid-seventies from Skylab.
Cumulonimbus, stratocumulus, very beautiful cloud formations and an
extraordinary density of water vapor as you can see.
Next slide. This
is what the ground looks like after you get rid of the forest. This picture
isn’t from Africa, it’s from Brazil
; but literally millions of hectares worldwide look like this today. You can see
that the watershed to this river, which is the Sao
Paulo River , has been almost totally devastated. You can see that
evaporation would occur rather rapidly instead of in a moderated sense through
the membrane canopy of the forest.
The next slide shows the way clouds
look after you do this. By the way, this is the same coordinate almost exactly,
taken from the Space Shuttle in 1984, as the slides show big billowy beautiful
clouds from Skylab ten years earlier. What you see beneath this cloudbank is now
desert. So the cloud building is no longer healthy. Instead of that nice kind of
veil of water vapor, you see an extraordinary, Los
Angeles scale, optical density. That’s dust.
Dust that has been
lifted and aerosolized and now remains in chronic suspension over much of the
African continent. The clouds are flat. The convective, humid currents that rose
from the rain forest no longer carry water vapor in significant quantities.
(At the end of the above “Charles N. Pogue: 200+ MPG Carburetor” case,
this writer, Gary Vesperman, mentioned that he had taken an introduction to
meteorology class given by University of Wisconsin-Madison climatology professor
Dr. Reid Bryson. One memorable lesson was a study Bryson had conducted of why
the Harappan empire of ancient India
had failed. Due to over-grazing by sheep and goats, the Harappan empire’s land
had become barren. Each drop of rain is comprised of enough water vapor
coalescing around a single dust particle that it becomes heavy enough to fall.
Bryson discovered that increasing dust in the air can reach a critical
point where there are so many dust nuclei per unit volume that none of the drops
of water can become heavy enough to fall as rain. A feedback cycle then starts
up where lack of rain causes even more dust to be stirred up into the
atmosphere. More dust causes even less rain to develop.
Bryson’s
suggested simple solution? Stop goats and sheep from over-grazing the land so as
to allow the land to re-vegetate and keep down the dust. The feedback cycle then
reverses itself – causing more and more rain to fall.)
There was a
great effort, a joint effort of the United
Nations and several other countries to seed what clouds remain to see if
the hydraulic cycle could be restored. Unfortunately somebody forgot to plant
anything under the seeded clouds, so the desert is now growing. The Sahara
desert is now growing six miles per year and is three thousand miles across.
This is significant.
Next slide please. This is to give you an idea of
the scale. We are not looking at the desert floor here. We are looking at a pall
of dust that stretches as far as the eye can see, to the curvature of the Earth.
Twenty-five maybe twenty-eight thousand square miles here. This area all used to
be called the sub-Sahara and now is moving into the Sahara . Flat clouds, no
rain.
The next slide will show you conclusively that when you see
breaks in the pattern, you have a deeper understanding of the optical density.
This density is equivalent to a critical day in Los
Angeles . This again is chronic and has serious ramifications for us on
this continent. Serious ramifications.
This has happened because
somebody denied vision. This has happened because when in 1906 Nikola Tesla said
that fossil fuels would one day create a corruption in the entire atmosphere of
the Earth, he was called eccentric. Next slide please.
South of the
aridification process, in Zaire
we have fires. These fires are burning out of control. They have no planes to
drop chemicals on the fires. They have no fire departments. They have no money.
This is a small area, only a hundred by a hundred miles. You can see where the
forest that was once there has already been stripped away, and the hydraulic
cycle therefore undermined.
The next picture is Angola
burning. The CIA
did not win the war in Angola
; fire did. 13,000,000 acres burned in 1985. When NASA
scientists examined this photograph, they thought that this was some sort of
strange cloud until they realized it was the combination of the plumes of smoke
from the fires. Just consider the area involved, and consider the fact that this
is now being visited on our country.
Alaska
in the last three weeks has lost 750,000 acres to fire. The Secretary of the
Interior, Hodel, said, “Let Nature take its course.” They saved part of
Yellowstone that was close to Old Faithful , but decided that the rest of the
wildlife habitat was expendable.
And this while we are spending
hundreds of millions of dollars producing neutron bombs and other clean kill
weapons, which can never be used and God forbid that they ever should be.
The next slide please. This is Junguoy (sp?) Bay on the coast of Madagascar
, and it is not uncharacteristic of bays all over the world now. This is what
happens after the deforestation and after the fires. This bay was over six
hundred feet deep twenty years ago. Now you can walk across it during the dry
season it is so filled with silt. This is happening now, today. It is not
theoretical. We have to move now.
Next slide please. This beautiful lake
was called Chad . Lake
Chad was the size of Lake
Erie . Lake
Chad supported 1.8 million human beings in peripheral agriculture and
fisheries. The next slide is Lake
Chad in 1982. (In his movie, An
Inconvenient Truth, I remember Al
Gore showed possibly this very same pair of satellite photos of Lake
Chad in central Africa . For an alarming update on Africa ’s huge lakes,
see
http://news.
yahoo.com/
s/ap/20061209/ ap_on_sc/ warmer_world_ african_lakes. Gary
Vesperman)
It’s the hole that was left when the hydrological cycle was
destroyed in Africa . This is not a cyclical drought, and it is not a drought
that will be only visited on Africa . The water vapor distribution on this
planet is being changed dramatically by the destruction of biomass.
The
water vapor budget on this planet is being changed dramatically because we have
failed to feel beyond our own little subjective event horizons. We tend to exist
like psychic black holes. We take a lot and give too little.
A few
years ago I pointed out at the fourth International conference on Atmospheric,
that the drought of 1986 and 1988 would occur. Now they have occurred. They are
not going to cease because we don’t want them to occur. They are not going to
cease until we realize that we need to mobilize every democracy on this planet,
and hopefully this will someday soon include the Soviet
Union, to implement this new class of technologies. We can address these
issues by planting forests and by using energy generated by these new
technologies. Whether you call it an “N” machine or something else, I’m sure
these technologies will continue to evolve.
By utilizing this energy
which we can get directly from the “vacuum” of space, we can desalinate and
re-irrigate. The Israelis if nothing else have shown us that you can resurrect a
desert. We are going to need to resurrect a planet. We cannot posture ourselves
and say that national security comes before the security of the human race. It
is the security of the human race in total that is now threatened.
This
is the last slide. I’m only going to show eleven slides today. I think they
speak for themselves. This is a veil of dust that stretches out towards the
horizon across the Atlantic Ocean, reaching from the Caribbean
Sea, in the lower portion, all the way to the African coast. This is not a
phenomenon that occurred in one year. This is a phenomenon that occurs every
year. Between eight and nine million square kilometers this year. (8-9,000,000
square miles)
This dust acts as condensation nuclei for water vapor
causing precipitation in the south, over water, in Honduras,
in Nicaragua,
while the Midwest
and Southeast are parched.
We are changing the way things work and we
haven’t even begun to inspect the ramifications. It isn’t just the “Greenhouse
Effect”; it’s a much more complex issue.
Only by stepping over the
threshold into a more synergistic view, which is not just a kind of convenient
term bandied about for the sake of the “New Age,” but only by entering into a
more synergistic view which acknowledges the inherent coherence of phenomena,
can we begin to comprehend the fact that when you do something here it affects
something over there. In quantum geometrodynamics, actually in a number of other
studies, what we call action at a distance, in a coherent field, distance is not
presumed.
I hope that this all has said something. Fuller’s suggestion
was that Project Earth should either determine whether there was a reason why we
had to implement these technologies, or whether it was no big deal.
“Can we last longer? – I need to get my next grant from DuPont.”
To produce more chlorofluorocarbons ? “Yes, it does seem that it might have that
effect, but if I say that in the literature than I am defying my
contract.”
Scientific integrity, which used to be something that
characterized science, is something that is sadly lacking in too much of the
scientific community. Too many have become grant whores and parasitic on
society, posturing themselves as authorities, condemned to the inertia of the
past and past conceptualizations of reality.
Recently I was lecturing
at John Hopkins, which is in itself sort of a miracle, about zero point physics
and while we were considering zero point physics somebody said, “Well this is
all well and good that Mister Tewari did this over in India
, and that it’s all well and good that you’ve done this in the United
States . DePalma, it’s all well and good to demonstrate it, but what
about the United
States Government?”
“I mean wouldn’t the United
States Government be doing something?” the child asked. A sixty-two year
old child, a very nice man actually. And I said all you need to do is get a hold
of the 1986 fiscal year “Request for Proposals” published by the Department of
Defense.
Look on page 193 of that document, and you will see something
very interesting. In the AF section, which is Air Force section 86-77 subsection
6, you will see that a government which denies the reality of zero point
technologies is requesting .... “further research into esoteric energies
heretofore unknown including the zero point dynamic fluctuations of Space.” ...
for propulsion. But it doesn’t exist you see...
But we want you to
research it if you have a bona fide organization that happens to be a prime
contractor with triple security clearance. This for propulsion for the Air Force
when the entire human race is threatened. Now there is a certain kind of
insanity somewhere implicit in that. It’s in the literature; you can order a
copy from Project Earth, or call the Pentagon.
This is not a classified document. I won’t get in trouble for saying anything.
This is actually a program that is ongoing, right now, today, within the
government enclave. Call Los
Alamos and ask a question about it, and you might get a very long silence
on the other end. Call Lawrence Livermore Laboratories and their Aberdeen
Testing grounds. The same phenomenon will probably occur.
A significant
amount of funding is going to make sure that this irrelevant, mythical phenomena
is applied to weapons systems and weapons-carrying systems. Something is very
wrong about that. I don’t believe that anybody sitting in this room would say
that it’s in the best interest of our people, or any people of the world, for
this kind of technology to be applied outside the realm of civilian application
at such a time.
Six to seven percent further depletion in
stratospheric ozone, and we are seeing depletion rate trends that indicate that
this level of loss will occur very easily within the next two decades. Those of
us who have really considered this, and as you consider it more and more I’m
sure you’ll realize that two decades pass very quickly, for all of us. It
doesn’t give us time, as I said before for subjectivity.
This field has
survived, but not on the basis of being acceptable in the literature. Tewari has
tried to publish. I know the IEEE (International Electrical and Electronic
Engineers) is in involved in this conference, but Tewari tried to publish in
IEEE and was summarily rejected. Many of us have tried to publish and have been
rejected. The reason Tewari even bothered to try to duplicate this “Acyclic
Closed Magnetic Generator,” after years of correspondence with DePalma, was
because he was able to convince some mechanical engineers that it had some
engineering method. You see they actually did material stress
analysis.
We also analyzed. We used beryllium copper for a reason. It’s
just engineering. There are a lot of you in this room who are perfectly capable
of doing it. There was nothing magical. We just operated on a different
presumption. We said, “Maybe this experiment will work.” And if it doesn’t work,
well then it’s like 88% of the rest of them. If it does work, heh, then there is
another level of confirmation.
Robert Kinchloe, Professor Emeritus of
Stanford
University , went to visit the, how can we call it, the encumbered
“Sunburst Machine”. This machine was originally developed by DePalma, Richardson
and Bernard at Sunburst Farms, Santa
Barbara , California . Dr. Kinchloe just out of curiosity of his own
mind, decided that he would just see if there was something about it that was
unusual. He presented a paper on it, and I understand that it only got to Bruce
through somebody else. But that’s not unusual; my own attorney has directed my
attention to an article I never knew existed. It’s funny about that.
It’s funny when representatives from our own Government look me
straight in the eye and say, “Yes we know this is real, but we wonder why you
would disclose it to foreign nations?”
I said, “I didn’t disclose it to
foreign nations. It was in an international publication in 1982, and I didn’t
even know about it.”
I would suggest to you that it’s time for us to not
simply entertain a curiosity. I would suggest to you that it’s time for us to
enter a human process of inter-relationship, to try to attempt to reintegrate
ourselves with one another and not in a floaty kind of “new age” sense
necessarily at all. Just call ten people and ask them to each call ten people
and tell them that we have an emergency on our hands. Demand that the people we
are hiring represent us, supposedly, not the major corporations. We are hiring
these people to represent US! Which one of you has the power to lobby in Washington
?
We need to send a very clear message to Washington
that states, “Gee, don’t you think it’s silly to be talking about Star Wars?
We’re only talking about Global Genocide.” This without doing anything except
for what we are doing right now. We don’t have to drop a bomb or fight a war.
Just continue exactly as we are now. All we have to do is remain in this
collective state of inertia. And I don’t personally believe we are going to do
that. I don’t believe that human beings are not going to rise to this occasion.
I don’t believe it for a second.
But, I do believe we need first to
understand what we are confronted with. And then we need to understand that we
can do something about it. We need to act, and we need to act like somebody who
is being chased by a hot poker, or someone who cares.
Whichever your
response is, Act!
Ten people calling ten people calling ten people,
covers the country in a week. It’s called “Exponential Networking.” I didn’t
come up with the idea; Fuller did. Call ten people. Ask them to call ten people
and find out what happens. It’s the equivalence of an electron avalanche in
human society. It works.
So, I wanted to try to give a wrap-up and I
wanted to cite the fact that we wouldn’t be here if it weren’t for somebody’s
vision. Yes, their vision was applied. Yes, their vision, his vision, Nikola
Tesla’s vision was brought into life. Otherwise he would have been a mere
mystic, wouldn’t he?
Yes, we do have to sit down with our Macintoshes,
or sit with our Hewlet Packard 41C calculators. We had a lot of money (for this
field). A total between the two phases of the experiment of about $200,000. And
now I’m finally happy to say it looks like it’s going to be produced, or at
least this one is going to be produced. It looks like DePalma is also moving
into that modality.
We are certainly hoping that more people will come
out of the woodworks and say, “Hey, well I’ve had this thing for the last thirty
years. But I was told that if I brought it out into the public when I was
working at Los
Alamos twenty years ago, they would basically permit character
assassination to ensue.”
It’s hard to believe in some ways, and I don’t
want to paint a black picture, but I think we have to see the end of times when
the New York
Times calls a National Center of Atmospheric Research scientist to ask,
“How come everyone in the world says that the Reagen report on acid rain is a
lie?” And the man answers, “You don’t understand the kind of pressure we’re
under here. People’s careers are in jeopardy.” This when all our lives are at
stake.
So I would like to open the floor to questions...
.
“.....I raised a question in another seminar about the oxygen
depletion, and the speaker told me that even if we were to kill all the forests
at once it would take a very long time for the oxygen to dissipate out of the
atmosphere.. ..
We are talking about a change in the mixture of gases,
okay? There are people who say that even if you combusted all the carbon on the
Earth, biomass and post-biomass, the oil reserves, everything, there would still
75% of the oxygen in the atmosphere. Unfortunately, they fail to take certain
things into account. For example:
Today we sit, and if you knew what we
went through to get this acknowledged in the world press (And it would take me
an hour to tell you), but we now have it publicly acknowledged by NASA
that we have between a 2.3% and 6.6% depletion in world wide atmospheric ozone
depending on latitude and time of year. This not taking into account the rather
large depression over Antarctica
.
When this level of ozone depletion occurs, the level of ultra-violet
influx increases the probability of photosynthesis in the lower atmosphere. So,
the O2 is preferentially converted into H2O3 for example. This would normally
only appear in great quantities after a lighting storm in the past.
We
have a lot of H2O3 in the atmosphere. We have a lot of O3 in the troposphere,
which until very recently was being attributed to internal combustion. But O3
was appearing in large quantities in rural areas where there was very little
internal combustion, relatively speaking. It became an embarrassment when the
Department of Agriculture had to admit that 2.6 billion dollars worth of crops
were being destroyed per year by ozone alone.
So the photosynthetic
reaction that is occurring as the result of increased ultra-violet influx must
be taken into account if we are going to begin to understand what is going to be
sustainable in terms of oxygen tensions. It is the mixture of gases that rise
from the biosphere through the troposphere and into the stratosphere, that
determines the tension of ozone, O3.
The Nimbus satellite, by the way
which NASA
has conveniently said is out of calibration even though it was in fine
calibration last September, and in almost perfect agreement with the
instrumentation on the ground in Antarctica.
Which by the way at the center of the Antarctic hole, six miles up, we had 96%
depletion levels last year (1987). The jumpsuits worn by some of my friends from
the Center for Atmospheric Research, please understand there are a lot of good
people there, people there I respect a lot, their nylon jumpsuits were actually
degraded by ultra-violet exposure in just one flight. Several people had serious
eye injuries.
Now anybody who is going to suggest that this type of
influx is not going to effect the species of molecules that we have in the
atmosphere, and the mixture of those gases, is denying an extremely important
fact. So whereas I’m not suggesting we’re all going to die of anoxia, what’s
going to happen when the phytoplankton in the oceans die? They are the basis of
the entire oceanic food chain. If you are not familiar with them, they are the
little critters that actually made all this possible. This conference would not
be occurring today without their sponsorship.
I think we need to realize
that we are sponsored by living things, and we need to support them so they can
support us. Does that answer your question?
Yes, thanks.
It
occurs to me that the resurrection of Nikola Tesla’s vision and other people who
have had the vision of the quantum ether, may yet be called on for a second
offering. I think it’s a good time to invest in this second offering of free
energy. We did not invest the last time and now we are paying for it. I don’t
want to see anybody suffer. What will it be like in ten years, when already the
American
Cancer Society says that even with sunscreen protection ratings of 15
SPF, direct sun exposure should be limited to an hour?
I hope the Tesla
Society will prosper, and move into a new age of manufacturing, implementation
and further development. I want what has happened so far to be totally obsolete
in ten years. One kilowatt in your pocket, why not?
There is absolutely
no reason why not. You’ve got ten to the ninety-fourth power, grams per cubic
centimeter energy equivalent field. It’s not in a great big area, but it’s a Lot
of energy. If we can just scrape the surface, ever so slightly, we would never
have to worry about it again.
That’s what Nikola Tesla was scheduled to
tell Franklin Delanor Roosevelt back in 1943. In 1943 he had proposed to FDR
that perhaps we should look carefully at the fact that we can get all the energy
we need from any space we happen to be in.
He didn’t show up for his
meeting with the president. He was found dead in his apartment, “Natural
causes.”
There is some suspicion that maybe his visionary paranoia of
poisoning was not exactly paranoia, ... but premonition.
I have never
mentioned this before, but when I spoke at the 1981 Conference at the University
of Toronto
, a detective, an older gentleman from New
York , with a heavy New
York accent, approached me afterwards and said that he was a detective at
the time when Tesla had been found dead, and said he was involved with the
investigation.
He said, for national security reasons, that nobody was
to know that the coroner’s report had indicated he had been poisoned.
I
have never personally read the coroner’s report, but the man was about the right
age. He showed me a badge, and I had no reason to doubt this man who had come
all the way up to Toronto from New York , just to tell somebody after all those
years.
The coroner’s report did say he had been poisoned. Now it turns
out that the only medium to my knowledge it actually cites that Tesla had been
poisoned is the Yugoslavian film on Nikola Tesla called, “The Secret of Nikola
Tesla.” So everybody can rewatch the introduction, because they say it right at
the beginning. And they also say perhaps that he was killed by the
Nazis.
I did not really want to mention all this, but science cannot
exist in an environment where science is not allowed to grow.
Any other
questions? Well, you have all been a tremendously patient group. Thank you for
your attention.
Thank you Adam.
