ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 321 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (June 24, 2026 - June 28, 2026) 2026 ESTC CONFERENCE

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    ECW E-Cat World

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    Panacea-BOCAF

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    T. Bearden Mirror Site

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    LENR Experimentalist
    Posted on Thursday, September 27, 2018 @ 19:54:38 UTC by vlad

    Science Anonymous writes: LENR might not represent low energy release rates at all.  Take a look at Subtle Atomics ICCF 21 presentation.  The new MESON alpha sub nuclear reactions.  Experimental evidence demonstrates that super dense sub primary electrons can potentially interact directly with nucleon sub components resulting in super high energy annihilation.  Sounds like LENR technologies would be better developed for larger GW scale based load plants, rather than focusing on smaller scale decentralized systems.  WO

    ICCF21 abstracts: LENR Catalyst Identification Model  by Simon Brink /Subtle Atomics, Australia/ Manningham Council, Australia

    Many Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) processes are now well known and well documented. LENR processes typically involve the use of specific catalysts to achieve transmutation and/or excess heat. Models previously proposed to explain LENR processes (Widom Larsen, hadrionic, hydronion, shrunken H, etc.) provide many insights into LENR processes, but do not yet provide a theoretical method for identifying catalysts.


    Early (1980’s) excess heat observations also resulted in alternative non-nuclear explanations, such as the potential for below ground state hydrogen (Mills, 1980’s) [1]. Below ground state hydrogen theory is particularly interesting as it can provide a theoretical basis for catalyst identification, via an extension of the Rydberg equation to below ground state. While aspects of the Mills theory can explain excess heat observations, overall the theory remains inconsistent with transmutation observations, and consequently LENR. We do however, need to be careful not to “throw the baby out with the bath water”. By adopting a first principles below ground state hydrogen model, significant progress is possible in developing a theoretical basis for LENR catalyst identification. 

    Re-examination of the Rydberg Excited State Model 

    The Rydberg model for the excited states of hydrogen allows transition energies between various states to be theoretically determined, and also poses a size relationship between excited states based on the ‘n’ variable. The Rydberg excited state size relationship is ‘ground state’ centred, with excited hydrogen state sizes all being linear multiples of the ground state size.

    If we remove ‘ground state’ centricity, an alternative excited state size model can be identified where each subsequent excited state of hydrogen, n+1, is twice the size of the previous excited state, n. The model can then be extended to below ground states, with each subsequent de-excited state, 1/[n+1], being half the size of the previous state, 1/n. 

    Why is a Modification of the Rydberg State Size Model Important for Understanding LENR? 

    The new hydrogen state size model proposes that below ground states of hydrogen are significantly smaller than ground state, for example: n = 1/5 will be 25 times (i.e. 32 times) smaller than ground state hydrogen. For smaller excited states, (i.e. n < 1/10), size approaches that of the larger nuclei.

    Various de-excited “small hydrogen” states are expected to be consistent with the characteristics of “small hydrogen” frequently considered to be a vital component of LENR processes. Most importantly, transition energies for the formation of these below ground hydrogen states can now be determined by a first principles extension of the Rydberg equation to de-excited states, noting that some calibration of the theoretical transition energies may still be required...


     
    Login
    Nickname

    Password

    Security Code: Security Code
    Type Security Code

    Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

    Related Links
    · More about Science
    · News by vlad


    Most read story about Science:
    100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


    Article Rating
    Average Score: 0
    Votes: 0

    Please take a second and vote for this article:

    Excellent
    Very Good
    Good
    Regular
    Bad


    Options

     Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


    "LENR Experimentalist" | Login/Create an Account | 0 comments
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.