Thanks Vlad for letting us know about Tim's APEC on line conferences. I was very impressed by most of the presenters so far, and by Tim's moderation style, but I do have a few comments for Tim (maybe he'd listen through you ?;-).

The conferences are too long (in my opinion) and significant time seems to be taken by people with mostly theoretical interests in the problem at hand (anti-gravity, harnessing ZPF, etc.). The mentality: "If science is the God, then physics is my religion" does turn the attitude of some of our theoretical physicists into that of dogmatic priests of science ... see Jack Sarfatti, who seems to know everything and claims to have solved all the mysteries of the Tic-tac operation since the aliens (actually humans from the future!?) told him the secrets over the phone a long time ago! David Chester (a brilliant guy, no doubt) got away easy (because he praised Jack) but others, who have different theories or don't agree with him and his claims (even Puthoff!), are immediately reprimanded by the Science Pope Jack (their claims are bull or a waste of time, etc.)!

We should all remember what Richard Feinman said: "Physics is to mathematics what sex is to masturbation". I was personally impressed by those presentations that don't abuse the math and theoretical physics, but present some daring experiments as well. I find these people most instructive and useful for most of the APEC attendees, and I take my hat off to guys like the Falcon Space team.

Tim may want to separate somehow (different APEC sessions?) the experimental physicists, who are much more interesting and useful to the cause of breakthroughs progress in this field, from the pure theoreticians who actually and openly admit are not at all concerned with the practical engineering issues of anti-gravity and ZPF tapping for useful power!

Thank you.

Solaris