I just recently learned that, last month, one of the most influential people in the field of exotic energy research, Thomas (Tom) E. Bearden, Lt Col, US Army, Ret., passed away at his home in Huntsville Alabama
after a long illness,
at the ripe age of 91. Tom was a good and brilliant man and will be greatly missed by everyone who came to know him. God bless his soul. My sincere condolences to his family.
Even
though we never met in person (just corresponded by email), he was one
of the people whose thoughts and ideas inspired me to start this site
(ZPEnergy) more than two decades ago, to try to inform the general
public that there are qualified scientists and inventors doing
legitimate work in this marginalised, but so crucial for solving most of the world's
problems these days, field
of "free energy" research.
To my surprise, I didn't find much about this tragic event on the net, but, I found a beautifully written eulogy (two parts), "Honoring Tom Bearden" on Jeane Manning's web site I would recommend all of you to read:
...and here are just two videos (among many) from YouTube, for those who want to see Tom and learn more about his work and the wonderful legacy he lives to the world:
Rest In Peace dear Tom.
To: Dr. Gordon ******, physicist
Dear Dr. ******:
I understand you made a personal comment to the Secretary of Energy that
I
was a "crackpot", perhaps because of my activities in attempting to
extract
electrical energy from the vacuum.
In the belief that you are a reasonable person, and since you have never
met
me and have no idea at all of my experience and professional abilities,
I
thought perhaps a reasoned discussion might be possible. You have heard
the
hearsay for your hasty conclusion; now I am asking you to hear the other
side of the story. I will thus give you some more detailed examples of
my
experience and performance than would be usual in a casual letter. This
is
to give you a deeper insight into the "crackpot", so you can better see
the
person, the experience, and his ansatz.
We will attach also the strong rebuttal I successfully made to the
referees
at Foundations of Physics Letters, answering the charge that the notion
of
COP>1.0 electrical power systems was "perpetual motion" and such. The
defense was successful and that AIAS paper was then published, as we
cite in
our reply to the engineering student at Georgia Tech.
First, I have a BS degree in mathematics, with minor in electronic
engineering. MS in Nuclear Engineering, Ph.D. in Science. I also had a
highly concentrated course (MOS 1181) in the U.S. Army, which the Army
considered equivalent to an MS in Aerospace Engineering, and which
included
radar theory, communications theory, servomechanism theory, rocket
propulsion (both liquid and solid), physics, mathematics, several
different
missile systems, guidance and control theory, etc. Several other radar
courses, postgrad statistics courses, etc.
Completed several other Army courses, including graduating from Command
and
General Staff College. This is essentially the equivalent of an MS in
Military Science.
I served on active duty for more than 20 years, specializing in Air
Defense
artillery (Nike Ajax, Nike Hercules, Hawk, Patriot, etc. as well as
technical intelligence. I served in Korea (not during hostilities) and
in
Vietnam (during hostilities), and was the Security, Plans, and
Operations
(combined G2-G3) staff officer for the Greater Saigon Subzone. The
actual
aerial evacuation of Saigon was conducted according to the plans I had
my
staff prepare in 1972 and personally approved. I was also there when
the
regular North Vietnamese Army came across the DMZ in a surprise and
heavy
invasion in Spring 1972, with tanks, artillery, the works. I was staff
responsible for all military combat planning and operations in a Subzone
larger than the greater New York area, with all the vulnerable U.S.
facilities such as MACV Headquarters, Naval Forces Headquarters, the
U.S.
Embassy and related facilities and personnel, etc. in my area of combat
protection responsibility. This was a 24-hour a day position, and I
could
not be relieved by anyone except the Commanding General himself or the
Chief
of Staff. Among other things, I successfully survived several
assassination
attempts because of my own attempts to break up a Mafia-type operation
at
Newport Harbor, where half the U.S. goods shipped in there were stolen
and
much went to the VC. A VC battalion was in fact stationed just across
the
bridge over the river, on the main road to USARV. I was not permitted
to do
anything about this enemy battalion, right under my nose, during my
tour.
That was the tariff battalion, which received the stolen goods. So one
of
the greatest VC supply depots was in fact Newport Harbor, under my staff
jurisdiction, and I nearly lost my life in attempting to stop it. Put
in
the same position again, I would again do my best to stop those
supplies,
being sent directly to the enemy and used to kill our troops and our
South
Vietnamese allies.
Hopefully you may recognize that no "crackpot" would ever be appointed
to
such a staff position by the Army, and if the incumbent did somehow turn
out
to be a crackpot, he would be summarily and instantly relieved on the
spot.
In combat, one does not survive by being an idiot. My military record
stands on its own merits, and includes several awards for direct
accomplishments such as (for example) solving a longstanding and severe
technical problem in the Nike (Ajax and Hercules) missiles that would
have
caused 2/3 of them to fail if fired in anger, solving a problem in the
Hawk
missile system that was causing half the units to become nonoperational
for
an extended period. My recognition of the cause of the latter problem,
and
my solution, were used for many years at the U.S. Army Signal School as
the
textbook example of recognizing and suggesting the fix of a severe
technical
problem. I also set up and taught the first ever U.S. Army classes
that
instructed U.S. Hercules battery commanders and battery officers how to
employ and utilize their nuclear warheads, including in and over
American
cities when defending against hostile nuclear attack. Here I was
teaching -- in the 1960s -- something similar to what faces our present
military leadership in case of large WMD attack on a U.S. city or
cities.
As an example, to decontaminate an anthrax city, obviously a chemical
spray
will have to be used. Yet any spray harsh enough to kill the anthrax
spores, will also account for the deaths of some of our aged and infirm,
sick, etc. citizens. One has a terrible job when one tells a military
commander that he will have to do something, to save a million or more
U.S.
citizen's lives, that will also directly kill 20,000 citizens. That was
the
type of thing one had to deal with in the Nike Hercules, and I assure
you
the U.S. Army will not have a nutcase teaching such terribly important
things with such stringent rules of engagement and control measures. I
received an Army Commendation medal for my solution to the technical
problem
in those Nike Ajax and Hercules missiles, after I personally briefed the
commanding general on the problem and how to solve it.
In technical intelligence, in the Defense Intelligence Community I first
forecast a Russian nuclear capability in their SAMS (DIA did not believe
it,
but it was found to be true). I also predicted a highly advanced
antimissile nuclear warhead capability that the Russians had developed,
that
both LANL and LLNL believed to be impossible and against the laws of
physics. This was as a young captain, serving in what today is MISC,
but
then was the U.S. Army Missile Intelligence Agency. For the antimissile
capability, I lost the battle in my briefing to the commanding general,
and
the LANL and LLNL view prevailed. Six months later, Picatinny Arsenal
tested
a nuclear weapon built as the Russian weapons were built rather than
like
ours were built, in an underground shot, and there was the very effect I
predicted and briefed, that was supposedly against the laws of physics.
And
this was before I received my MS in nuclear engineering at Georgia Tech.
Dr. Carter, Chief Scientist at Redstone Arsenal then, later offered to
hire
me as a result of that briefing and the proof that it was correct. He
had
taken me apart, but like the perfect gentlemen he was, based on the LANL
and
LLNL positions. Six months later, his hottest project became the very
thing
he had so taken me apart on.
Upon the end of my tour in Viet Nam, I was personally requested by
General
Fimiani, Project Manager of the then SAM-D (later Patriot) project,
under
the highest priority (which the project possessed). Then Lt. Col.
Fimiani
had known me from my direction of the Hawk Evaluation Team at McGregor
Range, when he came through as a Hawk Battalion Commander with his
battalion
package. He had personally observed my performance and ability.
Assigned
to Patriot, within days of my arrival I personally briefed General
Fimiani,
then the Project Manager, that an "advanced concepts HE warhead" being
promoted by Picatinny Arsenal (to the tune of some millions of Patriot
dollars) was in fact nothing but the old obsolete S-band SA-2 warhead,
which
had already been dramatically upgraded for the C-band SA-2. Picatinny
had
tested some of the S-band SA-2 warheads recovered from North Vietnamese
firings. General Fimiani cancelled that warhead project, and so Patriot
was
developed with at least a modern HE warhead rather than an obsolete one.
That action did not win me friends at large, but it did serve the best
interests of my country. I also briefed the General that only one
single
legitimate vulnerability model had been produced by government support
agencies for him, and thus his engineering warhead lethality and
probability
of kill models (which use of course a target vulnerability model as well
as
the warhead fragment flyout model itself) were not able to give reliable
results. The only true vulnerability model that had been made was that
for
the MIG-21. General Fimiani summoned a meeting of the vulnerability
community representatives, and lashed them unmercifully in person, then
fired off back channel messages to their respective commanders.
Needless to
say, in very short order, we had the necessary vulnerability models
(within
a year) that had not been produced in 10 years, even though funded off
the
Patriot (and earlier SAM-D) projects.
It was only with Herculean efforts that the Patriot project was saved,
and
that the U.S. Army has any effective main air defense missile today. In
one
"set-up", a distinguished wargames director from a DoD agency set up a
Patriot Cost and Operational Effectiveness Study for Congress, comparing
its
performance to manned interceptors, which simply gave every USAF
interceptor
3 kills just because it left the runway. No gaming, no simulation, just
a
blunt statement. On the other hand, the Patriot was simulated
inaccurately
so that it was at a grave disadvantage. The end result would have been
cancellation of the Patriot program prior to any deployment. I briefed
the
new Project Manager, General Means, on this coming disaster, and General
Means took very strong and immediate action through backchannel messages
to
the various Commanders of the agencies involved. I then personally set
up
and directed a simplified but accurate simulation effort and
methodology,
and we delivered a completely separate COEA to Congress. In this one we
laid out all the issues fairly and clearly, and in a very understandable
manner. Raytheon furnished the extensive simulation efforts necessary
to
provide the full-bore simulation data. IDA commented very favorably on
the
new methodology used in this COEA. As a result, the Patriot was not
cancelled, and the system survived. Just now, as you are aware, there
may
be coming hostilities in the MidEast, and the newest version of Patriot,
the
PAC-3, has been readied in great haste as our field army has no other
antimissile defense to speak of.
I point out to you that, in the former Gulf War, had the Patriot not
been
available and in Israel to fire (not too effectively, but some, since
that
version was not an anti-missile version) at the incoming Scuds, Israel
would
have entered the war and that war would have taken a very different
turn; as
an example, a full-bore Arab-Israeli war would have denied us our Saudi
bases, and with no bases, the magnificent performance of our forces
could
not have been sustained. Instead of a magnificent armored sweep, we
would
have had heavy going, gotten bogged down by absence of bases, and had a
more
"normal" war with huge U.S. casualties.
As MICOM Liaison Officer to CARDE, Camp Valcartier Canada, I was
responsible
for liaison for ARPA and MICOM on the then largest light gas gun test
range
in the Western World. I also solved several major problems of long
standing
there, and assisted the Canadians in solving others. That range and its
Joint U.S./'Canada project produced much of the technical data and
analysis
for the design of successful re-entry vehicles in our space program. I
also
provided Liaison on the joint U.S./Canada Meterological Data Sounding
Rocket
program, which was a successful. There we straightened out some real
problems in the previous lack of coordination between the Canadians
doing
the technical development and the U.S. agencies doing the overseeing.
During that tour, I also acquired a French language capability, required
for
the position.
I retired in 1975, and worked until 1993 in aerospace, for several
aerospace
companies. This included two years in anti-radiation missile
countermeasures simulation and analysis, being performed for the U.S.
Army,
several years directing SHORAD simulation and analysis, and a threat
study
drafted for Saudi Arabia just prior to the Gulf War, as well as a prompt
"Lessons Learned" personal study (in my personal off time) delivered by
my
company shortly after the war. This latter was placed in the Saudi's
War
College and became mandatory training for Senior Saudi Officers. The
former
study (Threat to Saudi Arabia) became the formal threat recognized and
accepted by the Saudi government. I personally performed the Electronic
Warfare portion of that study, and much of our draft study already
delivered
was validated by the Gulf War when it occurred right in the middle. I
received a substantial bonus from my company for the "Lessons Learned"
study, as it caused a sensation in Saudi Arabia and helped save a $170
million company contract.
For many years I worked long hours in my personal life on advanced
concept
weapons the Russians secretly had developed and were developing. We
first
predicted them, then gathered supporting data from the open literature,
showing the development of longitudinal EM wave interferometer weapons,
now
substantiated. Today we can give a fairly thorough briefing on the
subject,
well-founded in physics and in higher symmetry electrodynamics. I first
called these "scalar" weapons, and today there exists a technical paper
in
the open literature, using O(3) electrodynamics, proving the fact that
such
scalar interferometry produces normal EM transverse waves and fields and
field energy in the distant interference zone, just as I stated even
though
severely chastised for so stating. We were the very first in the U.S.,
it
appears, to point out the still-neglected longitudinal EM wave "interior
EM
dynamics" inside every ordinary EM wave, field, and potential, and
comprising it, based on two papers by E.T. Whittaker in 1903 and 1904.
Engineering the internal LW EM dynamics engineers not only
electrodynamics
as ordinarily known, but also general relativity. Thus it involves the
direct engineering of a unified field theory, but with specialized
electromagnetic methods. Superluminal movement of waves, e.g., comes
out of
it, much as shown by Rodrigues and Lu in their paper dealing with
superluminal solutions to Maxwell's equations (formerly carried on the
LANL
website and published in the open literature, along with several others
on
undistorted progressive waves). The 1904 paper initiated what is called
superpotential theory, but the 1903 paper on the internal, infolded
electrodynamics has continued to be neglected. Later, working with
Fogal,
the inventor (two patents, others in progress) of the Fogal
semiconductor,
there finally came available the electronic means of utilizing the
infolded
EM longitudinal wave electrodynamics. Fogal's work is now funded by
several
very large communications companies here and abroad, and his
semiconductors
will be on the market before very long, being produced by a major
semiconductor manufacturer. Fogal has demonstrated the transmission of,
e.g., video pictures and programs through the interior of a purely DC
potential, at a substantial distance. There are other marvelous
capabilities that spring from use of the Fogal semiconductor, and I
personally have the rights for its use, worldwide, in energy systems.
Once
available, it will make the design and use of COP>1.0 electrical power
systems rather straightforward. I accent that major well-known
companies of
the world are now financing Fogal, and will be placing the chip into
communications systems in the near future. This is a proven product,
already headed into production and use, and I doubt that the DoE is even
aware of it.
I have participated in the past in development of an uncurled
A-potential
transmission system (by Golden), and by a demonstration of local (20
feet)
superluminal communication (Golden). Fogal has in fact demonstrated
superluminal communication via the "internal, infolded LW
electrodynamics",
to a large company. I am under nondisclosure agreement on that set of
experiments, and cannot discuss or include details. This capability
will in
fact be seen worldwide, when the Fogal semiconductors are in production
and
being used in equipment. That is imminent.
Since mass is mostly empty space, and similar to a solar system, with a
particle here and there, and with the intervening space filled with
waves,
fields, and potentials, then "mass" is actually a vast superhighway for
the
passage of longitudinal EM waves, including from LWIs. As an example,
the
U.S.S. Thresher was killed underwater off the East Coast of the U.S., in
April 1963, by such an LWI. The mechanism was simple; the LWI beams
simply
reached through the intervening mass of the ocean and earth and set the
interference zone around the hapless sub. It was an extensive IZ, in
those
early days, and not localized to the 3 inches they can do now. In that
zone, ordinary EM energy (scattering) was emerging from the local
spacetime
itself. Hence inside all the sub's electrical and electronic systems,
there
was "strong noise jamming" emerging directly in there, so the sub could
not
be controlled. It then sank to crush depth and imploded.
We published that openly, in several publications. The U.S.S. Skylark,
surface companion of the Thresher, was in the "splatter zone"
surrounding
the near-field IZ (where there is "partial IZ or was in those early
days),
and thus received excessive jamming of its own electronic systems -- so
badly, that it required over an hour for the ship to send its emergency
message back to headquarters that the Thresher was in trouble.
The next day, while many ships were now off the U.S. coast and searching
for
the Thresher, Khrushchev placed a deep underwater EM burst (simply an
LWI
operated in the "peak power pulse" mode) deep under the ocean's surface,
100
miles north of Puerto Rico. The surface of the ocean boiled, then a
cone of
water rose up about a mile high, turning into a cauliflower shape and
falling back into the ocean. A passing U.S. jetliner crew observed that
phenomenon, and reported it to the Coast Guard and to the FBI upon
landing
in Florida. My information came from a colleague who personally
interviewed
the copilot on that aircraft and on that flight, who himself had
personally
seen the phenomenon.
We identified the type of weapon (LWI) that killed the Arrow DC-8 on
Dec.
12, 1985 at Gander, Newfoundland. The instruments on the aircraft
actually
recorded the strike of the ball of EM energy (EM missile) formed by the
distant interferometer in Russia, which is what struck the aircraft on
the
right fuselage ahead of the wings. An eyewitness, Judy Parsons,
actually
observed the strike, but her testimony was not given to the Canadian
board
investigating the affair, because certain folks in the U.S. deeply
involved
in the Iran-Contra scandal, feared it was an Arab terrorist strike, and
so a
full-bore investigation might have smoked out Iran-Contra (which of
course
later did come out). The site was bulldozed over far too quickly, by
strong
pressure from the U.S. (a general officer arrived on the scene, to see
that
it was done). The first thing that had happened to the aircraft was
that
the combustion in the jet engines were cooled. This capability was
already
well-known to me and it had been tested by the Russians earlier that
year
against the engines of an airliner enroute from the East to San
Francisco,
and still off Los Angeles. The engines of that plane flamed out, one by
one, and the aircraft fell thousands of feet before finally getting the
engines started again. Here the Russians were just testing, to
stimulate
the system and see if the U.S. knew of the weapons. They did not. As
the
DC-8 at Gander went down the runway for lift-off, the cooling of the
combustion began. The thrust of the jet engines thus became below
normal,
so that the thrust per weight ratio also was reduced. Simply increasing
the
weight of the airplane by icing will do it also, but so will leaving the
plane clean and reducing the thrust. Our investigators have no
knowledge of
LWIs, hence no knowledge of combustion cooling of jet engines at a
distance
(and many other tricks). The pilot at liftoff realized something was
amiss
because he did not have the normal lift. He started a turn to the
right,
whereupon the second hit -- that of the EM missile -- was made. That
fiery
ball of energy melted right through the fuselage (the hole was checked,
and
there are no combustion products there, as there would be from an
ordinary
missile, etc.). The EM missile explosively ignited the plastics in the
seats and carpets in the forward part of the airplane, and those
plastics
explosively outgassed -- one product being cyanide gas. A few breaths,
and
the passengers in the forward cabin were dying of cyanide poisoning.
The
autopsies on the bodies later showed that about half the people on board
did
in fact die of cyanide poisoning before the plane crashed and exploded;
they
were already dead. The autopsy results were also deliberately withheld
from
the Canadian Investigation board.
I published a picture -- a real, honest-to-God photo -- of the EM
missile
strike of that very same weapon that killed the Arrow DC-8, but two
weeks
earlier in practice offset tests using U.S. shuttle launches from Cape
Canaveral as convenient "practice target ICBM launches" for testing in
the
"launch phase antimissile system" mode. Also, I identified the standard
artillery technique used for fire control; shift from a known
registration
point. There is some "deviation" in the LW beams of an LWI in going
through the "superhighway" inside the earth and ocean's masses, and so
the
analog of "meteorological corrections" to the artillery firing of LWI EM
missiles must be applied. The "shift from a known registration point"
is
one convenient and proven means for such "mett corrections" in standard
artillery practice. The "registration point" for that test at Cape
Canaveral in latter Nov. 1985 was a little ball of light high above the
launch area, and I published a picture of that one also (it was seen by
hundreds of persons, and it was also published in a Florida newspaper).
That EM missile practice strike itself was deliberately kept out of the
visible spectrum itself, occurring in the IR and UV so that humans would
not
visually see it. Film, however, will capture further into IR and UV
than
the human eye sees, so it was captured on film.
This is just two weapons incidents out of more than a hundred I
identified
over the years. All of which I properly reported, then published. No
one
at the time believed it in officialdom. Today, it is certified and
known.
As an example, this appears to be the exact weapons (these LWIs) that
Secretary of Defense Cohen confirmed openly at a conference in Georgia
in
1997. Quoting: "Others [terrorists] are engaging even in an eco-type
of
terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes,
volcanoes
remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves... So there are plenty
of
ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they
can
wreak terror upon other nations...It's real, and that's the reason why
we
have to intensify our [counterterrorism] efforts." Secretary of Defense
William Cohen at an April 1997 counterterrorism conference sponsored by
former Senator Sam Nunn. Quoted from DoD News Briefing, Secretary of
Defense William S. Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of
Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Apr.
28,
1997.
We were writing (albeit crudely at first) about such weapons in 1979.
We
also explained the so-called "microwave radiation" of the U.S. Embassy
in
Moscow, which was for nearly a half century, and was responsible for the
deaths of three U.S. ambassadors, plus many people developing diseases
and
health conditions. My long years of work on deciphering the Kaznacheyev
mechanism for EM induction of cellular changes and diseases in cell
cultures, and also in deciphering how the Priore team in France (working
with eminent French scientists) were able to produce revolutionary cures
for
cancer, infectious diseases, suppressed immune systems, and clogging of
the
arteries in laboratory animals. The results are rigorously documented
in
the hard French scientific literature, and in one doctoral thesis
granted by
the University of Bordeaux. After 14 years work on the problem, we did
solve it and have published the gist of the solution. In 1998 I sent a
200+
page document to the NIH, USAF, DoD, and others recommending a crash
national effort to develop a portable, suitcase-sized treatment unit for
emergency treatment of mass casualties resulting from the coming WMD
weapon
strikes upon our cities and population centers. Sadly, no one even read
the
French references cited to prove the results that could be achieved.
But we
tried. We are still trying, but through civilian channels and an
attempt to
raise private funding to get on with it. If a full-bore Arab-Israeli
war
erupts there in the MidEast from the present deteriorated situation,
then we
as a nation are very likely to get those dreaded WMD strikes upon our
cities
and large populations. There are even large Russian nuclear weapons
already
brought into the U.S. and in the hands of Spetznaz teams; read Lunev's
book,
with the data released by the CIA, and he tells us how the Russians
spirited
in the nukes, very easily.
So the first phase of WW III -- delivering the weapons of mass
destruction
to their targets -- has already been accomplished, by the Russians and
several other nations hostile to the U.S. The world is actually time
bomb,
ticking away. And this is largely the official, recognized threat I am
citing! The threat of massive WMD attacks in our cities and population
centers is indeed the officially recognized strategic threat to the
United
States. If a full Mid-East Arab-Israeli war erupts, then the
probability
of such attacks in our cities becomes menacing and perhaps even
imminent.
The terrorist teams and the weapons are already on site, waiting for the
order to attack.
We have also furnished information (whether believed or not) on other
terrible doomsday weapons developed by the Russians (always under KGB
stringent control and operation, never in the normal armed forces), and
some
by China. The dominant weapons on earth today are the quantum potential
weapons developed by Russia, Brazil, and one other small but friendly
nation. Unfortunately, China either now has the QP weapons, or is very
near
deployment. China has, e.g., recently deployed a most formidable weapon
indeed, that would nullify our plans to send a Naval Task Force to the
rescue or defense of Taiwan, in case of pending Chinese attack. That
weapon
is a variant on the old "pulsed positive energy" weapon, and is easily
explained. So they deployed a second major kind of EMP weapon, where
the
pulse is negative EM energy in spacetime rather than positive EM energy
in
spacetime. The negative energy pulse curves the local spacetime, so
that
electrons are emptied out of the Dirac Sea and Dirac Sea holes are
created
violently in the pulsed or interference zone. The Russians tested a
small
version of such a weapon in the Afghan war, against the villagers of two
Afghan villages. The struck bodies instantly lost all their flowing
Drude
electrons, so all electron currents were instantly extinguished. This
is
total and instant death for every cell, every part of it, every
bacterium,
every virus, etc. The bodies fell like limp rags, and lay where they
fell
with never a single twitch. Of course not!
Recently a U.S. Navy 2-carrier group maneuvered and demonstrated in the
South China Sea, as a show of force demonstrating our intention of
supporting Taiwan against any Chinese attack. Unknown to that task
force,
EMP(2) weapons were already deployed there by the Chinese. What would
happen to an aircraft carrier struck by such a weapon?
All the personnel would be instantly and totally dead. In the ship and
its
complement of equipment and systems, all electrical currents in
electrical
and electronic systems would be extinguished instantly, as the electrons
fell into the Dirac holes and annihilated. So all electrical and
electronic
systems would be instantly dudded, totally. With a very few shots, the
entire Naval Task Force would be floating dead in the water, never
knowing
what hit them. That capability exists in the hands of the Chinese now,
and
it is already one of those things deployed against Taiwan and South
China
Sea naval forces threatening or impeding the Chinese.
Of course Dirac sea holes can be used, if we but put our minds to it.
Even
the staid Nature has reported the marvelous results of using Dirac holes
(positrons) in a microscope. See Philip Ball, "The positron probe,"
Nature,
news feature, Vol. 412, 23 Aug. 2001, p. 764.
So we confirmed "electron dissolution", longitudinal EM wave
interferometer
weapons, etc. I wrote of these and briefed various government groups on
these, long before anyone would believe it. Many still do not know of
such
weapons, and still do not believe it. The weapons are there. They are
confirmed. So the "crackpot" -- who simply did his job using the
conventional "gather and interpret the indicators" method of standard
intelligence -- has been largely proven right. On the weather
engineering.
On the volcano eruption stimulation. Etc.
What is not well-known at present is that a rogue Japanese group,
consisting
of the Yakuza and the Aum Shinrikyo, leased the earlier LWI weapons from
the
KGB, on site in Russia, right at the end of 1989, when the Russians had
just
deployed their quantum potential weapons. The leasing is easily
confirmed;
my information came from a person physically present at the meeting in
Russia where the lease was consummated. The Aum Shinrikyo set up a
university in Moscow where the KGB engineers could teach them the
technical
aspects of LWI weapons. The down payment on the lease was $900 million
in
gold bullion. Sen. Nunn's committee confirmed that the Aum Shinrikyo
alone
had a billion dollars in gold bullion, and the Yakuza had ripped off the
Japanese consumer to the tune of several hundred billion dollars, in
fact
causing the decline of the Japanese economy.
So the "fingers on the triggers" of the LWIs, since early 1990, have
been
rogue Japanese. It is not that difficult to get information from Japan,
but
one would be a fool to "go it alone" without proper backup. Japanese
groups
have indeed approached me with much information, but I declined meetings
face to face, etc., with no protection and no backup. We had one run-in
with the Yakuza here in Huntsville, Alabama (multiple witnesses, all
reliable Ph.D.s and aerospace engineers) and I do not wish for more.
To decipher what the Russians had done in weaponry, it very early became
apparent that they were not using ordinary U(1) electromagnetics,
because
that standard model prohibits the very things that were occurring. All
that
says is that they are using a higher symmetry electrodynamics, in which
a
great many more things can be done that exist in U(1) EM, and
particularly
which exist in ordinary electrical engineering, which has a 136-year old
archaic foundation and is riddled with known errors. Who says so?
Nobelist
Feynman said so, John Wheeler says so, etc. Many other formidable
electrodynamicists and physicists have pointed this out. It is not
difficult to show a great number of these errors, and many have already
been
pointed out in the literature but ignored. So over the years, by
looking
beyond U(1) electrodynamics, I slowly learned enough about higher
symmetry
electrodynamics to recognize the mechanisms involved in such things as
these
weapons and also the Priore and Kaznacheyev work. My work was obviously
crude at first, and was improved as I learned more. Today it will stand
on
its own merit, for the necessary higher symmetry EM is there in the
literature and waiting to be uncovered and used.
One thing impressed me very much: The standard practice in the U.S.
intelligence and R&D community of using U(1) electrodynamics and B.S.
level
electrical engineers, radar engineers, etc. will never reveal what the
Russians, Chinese, and several other nations are doing in their advanced
weapons programs using the higher electrodynamics and some of the finest
nonlinear scientists in the world. In fact, as has been shown in the
last
three years by the Alpha Foundation's Institute for Advanced Study (of
which
I am a fellow emeritus), Myron Evans (600 papers in the hard refereed
literature) and other advanced EM theorists have shown that what comes
out
of it is a unified field theory, closely allied to Sachs's
well-documented
unified field theory, that applies from the quarks and gluons all across
physics and to the entire universe. Further, in some things where it
has
been tested, Sachs' theory predicts results much more accurately than
the
standard model being used.
I will tell you that, on three occasions since January 1997, this nation
has
been within days of full strategic assault by the KGB and others
(including
the rogue Japanese manning the LWIs in Russia). These were scheduled
attacks, and the first one would have been in February 1997. For that
one,
we desperately notified (with some difficulty) the "friendly little
nation"
that has QP weapons, and it forced an abortion of the attack. The
attack
was immediately rescheduled for May 1, 1997 (May Day that year would
have
been a really big KGB celebration!). We finally figured out (in
desperation
again) why and how the little nation's counter had been countered, and
with
all other means failing, we simply faxed the Prime Minister of that
nation
directly, warning him of the changes in the attack, what would be used
to
counter the QP weapons and how, and to change his command and control
system
from a "sane" (look, see, decide, issue the fire order) mode to the
"insane"
mode (every two hours, the computer automatically issues the launch
order
and launch sequence begins for the QP weapons. If anyone is left alive
on
site, at one point in the sequence the codes are entered and the weapons
stood down and reset again, to wait for the next two hour launch
sequence.).
That change was made, fortunately, and the Russians were notified by the
Little Nation of the change. So that Russian "energetics" (their term)
strategic weapons strike was aborted two days before the actual strike
would
have occurred, destroying the U.S. in about 2 hours. Those Russian
forces
were standing down, just about the time that Secretary of Defense Cohen
was
making his statement in latter April 1997 confirming the earlier type
weapons, in that conference in Georgia.
A pre-emptive strike was made by the friendly little nation on the
facilities in Russia that were later preparing the third scheduled
attack.
I do not know the exact date, but had again warned the little nation of
that
pending attack and its nature, what it consisted of, etc.
In all these actions, I also notified our own officials and U.S.
Intelligence of what I was doing. If it takes it to save my country, I
will
contact the devil himself to get a checkmate or abortion of an impending
strategic attack against which we are helpless.
I did so, once again, for the fourth attack. That one was so bizarre
and
eerie, that none of our scientists would believe it, although again I
notified our own proper authorities. There was indeed a rather large
and
completely undetected strategic battle, and the little nation won
easily, as
it turned out. They even sent me a carefully worded "Thank you! We had
missed that one!" message. In all these actions I took, I am quite
certain
the NSA intercepted my open message to the Prime Minister, and my open
messages to the National Embassy of that nation here in America. Again,
one
does what he has to do to try to help save his country, and that is
precisely what I did. I will do it again if the occasion arises, since
we
ourselves do not have the necessary QP weapons required for real
deterrence.
Meanwhile, I have suffered a heart attack, and am slowly recovering over
the
next several months, still suffering from some hypoxia. My work on the
COP>1.0 electrical power systems is successful, and I have personally
worked
upon four such units that actually produced COP>1.0. The Sweet vacuum
triode amplifier (which I named and also explained its operational
mechanism) produced a COP = 1,500,000. Highly experienced test
engineers,
independently, tested it, such as Walter Rosenthal, a professional
aerospace
test engineer of many years experience. Walter also observed and tested
the
closed-loop, self-powering Sweet VTA version built by Sweet, which I
never
personally saw or worked on. The Sweet unit could also perform
antigravity,
and a highly successful test in that mode was conducted by Sweet. The
results are reported in Floyd Sweet and T. E. Bearden, "Utilizing Scalar
Electromagnetics to Tap Vacuum Energy," Proceedings of the 26th
Intersociety
Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC '91), Boston,
Massachusetts,
1991, p. 370-375. The weight of the open-loop unit was steadily reduced
by
90% on the bench, and the actual measurements of the experiment are
reported
in the paper. I no longer work on antigravity, but focus on energy and
medical applications of higher symmetry electromagnetics. Also, since
we
still do not have effective U.S. defenses against KGB/Russian energetics
weapons, I continue to observe the situation for any major new
developments,
as best I can. Almost always, the evidence appears in the open
literature,
if one has the proper "higher symmetry electromagnetic system" filter to
recognize what it is.
That is a sort of quick overview of my background and experience. My
long
years of successful and decorated service with the Army speaks for
themselves, as do my years of work in aerospace. I solved many real
problems in both areas, during my tenure in each. They are a matter of
record, and readily substantiated.
As far as my work on permissible COP>1.0 electrical power systems is
concerned, I attach two documents: (1) a response I gave to an
electrical
engineering student at my old alma mater, Georgia Tech, and (2) a
rebuttal I
gave to the charge of perpetual motion nonsense, in the defense of a
second
paper on the motionless electromagnetic generator (MEG) which is a
successful overunity laboratory experiment we are developing for
commercialization, in partnership with the National Materials Laboratory
of
the National Academy of Sciences of a friendly foreign nation. There we
were pleasantly surprised to find that higher symmetry electrodynamics
and
the flaws in the Maxwell-Heaviside-Lorentz theory are well-known and
recognized, and that in fact the higher symmetry EM is already being
taught
in their universities. Our joint effort company in that nation will
develop
the system for commercialization, with the first 2 KW or so unit to go
on
the market a year from now. Scale-up thereafter will be very quick. We
have also solved the problem of close-looping and stabilizing a COP>1.0
system, together with a close colleague of long standing, and we have
released that to our colleagues overseas as well. We will have a robust
demonstrator in the U.S. when and if we obtain separate funding to do
it.
We are not really interested in "debating" overunity, since every charge
and
dipole in the universe is already a legitimate and validated COP>1.0 EM
system. But most of our advanced experimental work is now underway in
that
very prestigious and capable foreign laboratory of international
recognition, as legally released by the U.S. Commerce Department. In
our
view, the ansatz of the scientific and electrical and energy community
in
the U.S. is still too outdated to permit and support real
"out-of-the-box"
research and development in the electrical energy field. Hence to get
it
done, it must be done overseas.
Every electrical power system that is presently built, and ever has
built,
was and is powered by electrical energy extracted directly from the
vacuum
by the source dipole in the generator, once the charges are forced apart
and
that dipole made. Generators do not power their external circuits by
transducing their input mechanical shaft energy. Instead, they expend
their
internal energy to force those charges apart and establish the dipole
between the terminals of the generator. If we believe particle physics
and
the conservation of energy law, then that dipole extracts usable EM
energy
from its continuous absorption of virtual photon energy, transduces it,
and
pours it out of the terminals and along the conductors of the external
circuit, filling all space around those conductors. The flow of EM
energy
in a circuit is a transmission and reception problem, having nothing to
do
with j(phi). The broken symmetry of the opposite charges of the dipole,
has
been proven for over 40 years in particle physics, with the award in
1957 of
the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang for the discovery of broken symmetry.
The
very definition of broken symmetry with the vacuum flux, means that the
dipole-- which continuously absorbs virtual photon energy from the
vacuum --
integrates some of this absorbed energy into observable EM energy and
outputs that observable EM energy in 3-space in all directions.
In U(1) electrodynamics and particularly electrical engineering, the
vacuum
is assumed inert and the local spacetime is assumed to be flat. In
effect,
this arbitrary assumption discards the "active environment" in which
every
charge and dipole -- and hence every electrical power system --
operates.
Isn't that nice! That puts the system in firm but assumed equilibrium
with
its active external environment -- which consists of that active local
vacuum and that active locally curved spacetime. As everyone knows, any
system in equilibrium with its active environment cannot exceed COP =
1.0,
for a perfect loss-free system, a priori. On the other hand, anyone
worth
his salt also knows that a system is disequilibrium with its active
environment (such as a windmill in a wind) is permitted to do five
"magic"
functions. Such a system can: (1) self-order, (2) self-oscillate or
self-rotate, (3) output more energy than the operator inputs (the excess
is
freely input from the active environment), (4) power itself and its load
(all the energy is freely received from the environment, like that
windmill
in the wind), and (5) exhibit negentropy.
Please read my rebuttal paper sent to Foundations of Physics Letters to
answer all charges against the permissibility of COP>1.0 systems. Also
my
reply to the engineering student, pointing out what electrical
engineering
is and is not, and does and does not do.
I will have a book, Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts and Principles,
published by World Scientific in 2002. That will reveal all that anyone
needs to know, to set about directly developing COP>1.0 systems,
including
how to close-loop one for self-powering. If the U.S. Department of
Energy
will not fund and perform such research, then we have to insure that it
gets
done elsewhere and by many companies and groups worldwide. That we
have
already insured; it is now just a matter of time until these
"impossible"
COP>1.0 systems are on the market -- precisely similar to the treatment
given to Ovshinsky's amorphous semiconductors by this same U.S.
scientific
community, which also loudly called Ovshinsky a "crackpot" and
charlatan,
and slandered and libeled him unmercifully. The Japanese funded his
work,
and one day the U.S. scientific community awoke to find several thousand
amorphous semiconductors working very well in copier machines. Since
then,
their use has grown, and of course once Ovshinsky proved it, the
community
had to accept it. But no one ever apologized to Ovshinsky for their
slandering and libeling him so widely and resoundingly. Any historian
of
science can give you dozens of cases where exactly the same treatment
was
dished out to out-of-the-box discoveries. This is the normal knee-jerk
reaction of science, unfortunately. The not-too-long-ago development
of
the ultrawideband radar, e.g., was more of the same, and pioneers like
Harmuth and Barrett were savaged, hounded including out of a job,
slandered,
libeled, etc. All the critics were wrong, wrong, wrong. Today, of
course,
many of those same arch critics consider themselves to be UWB experts
first
class.
Anyway, that is a sort of overview of my background and experience.
As for my personal data, I'm married (happily, for 37 years), going on
71, have four grown children, and I live at 2311 Big Cove Road,
Huntsville, Alabama 35801-1351. I will be happy to
answer any questions you have, and since you seem to have accused me of
being a nutcase, I would appreciate the Secretary at least hearing the
other
side of the story, and not just be convicted by hearsay in one casual
remark. I cannot travel yet, because of my health, but am certainly
willing
to meet you in person, and you can see with your own eyes whether I'm a
crackpot or a scientist trying to do a very tough and difficult job. If
you
wish a real briefing on the Russian advanced energetics weapons, come
and
spend a couple of days with me, after giving me time to ready my
viewgraphs,
and I will lay it out for you...
Source: https://cheniere.org/correspondence/090201.htm
