 |
There are currently, 150 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
Tom Bearden Website Update
Posted on Tuesday, May 01, 2007 @ 23:52:14 UTC by vlad
|
|
Anthony Craddock writes: We are pleased to announce a USD 10 reduction in the price of Tom Bearden's unique book "Oblivion - America at the Brink."
http://www.cheniere.org/sales/buy-ob.htm
The original working title for this book was "Mind Wars," and this treatise exposes in intricate technical detail the tools that have been, and are currently being, deployed in the international Mind Control wars.
It was originally prepared as a briefing for the leaders of the friendly nation most likely to be able to counter the threat, and other government representatives have subsequently beaten a path to Tom Bearden's door for personal briefings on the subject. The subject matter is real science, not, regrettably, science fiction.
This book is the only source worldwide for this information.
The correspondence section of the Website has also been updated.
http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/index.html
And, for all those of you who have been asking about the sequel to the fantastically popular "Energy from the Vacuum Series - Part 1" DVD, we plan to formally announce the release of Part 2 (featuring John Bedini) later this month. Note: we are NOT taking orders yet, but we will be putting out a broadcast when the inventory is received and is ready to ship.
www.energyfromthevacuum.com
We are also eyeing a Second Printing of the incredible best selling Bearden/ Bedini book "Free Energy Generation - Circuits & Schematics," as the overwhelming demand is fast depleting our existing stock.
http://www.cheniere.org/sales/buy-feg.htm
Regards
Tony Craddock
Director
The Tom Bearden Website/ Cheniere Media
www.cheniere.org
---------------------------------
Extract from the letter:
Answers to some questions and an asymmetric free energy approach
Hi Jonathan,
At least a dozen nations today have scalar interferometers, in one form or another. These nations include Russia (under the auspices and control of the KGB), China, Israel, Brazil, and several others.
Rigorous proof of scalar interferometry is given by M. W. Evans et al., "On Whittaker's Representation of the Electromagnetic Entity in Vacuo, Part V: The Production of Transverse Fields and Energy by Scalar Interferometry," Journal of New Energy, 4(3), Special Issue, Winter 1999, p. 76-78.
We have all been very much lied to about EM energy, also. Maxwell’s actual theory is not taught in university, and never has been in any electrical engineering courses. When you were told you were studying Maxwell’s theory, you were being lied to.
To see Maxwell’s original theory, courtesy of the ZPE website, simply download the individual pages at these links (one page for each link):
http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/Maxwell_1864_1.pdf
http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/Maxwell_1864_2.pdf
http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/Maxwell_1864_3.pdf
http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/Maxwell_1864_4.pdf
http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/Maxwell_1864_5.pdf
http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/Maxwell_1864_6.pdf
http://www.zpenergy.com/downloads/Diagram.pdf
Any EM transmitter you have radiating has, in addition to the accounted
divergent Poynting energy flow component you were taught, a giant
curled Heaviside energy flow component, unaccounted since Lorentz
(apparently at the bidding of the giant cartels) arbitrarily excluded
it from the watered-down Heaviside equations and theory in 1900. The
magnitude of that giant curled component (ironically discovered by
Heaviside, whose work was used to severely truncate Maxwell's theory
and work) accompanying every accounted Poynting component is more than
a trillion times the magnitude of the Poynting component.
In
the 1880s and 1890s, Tesla was hell-bent on giving the world free
energy directly from the active medium (what today we would call the
“active vacuum” or “active spacetime itself”).
[Rigorous proof
that eliminating the arbitrary Lorentz condition provides systems
having free additional energy currents from the vacuum is given by M.
W. Evans et al., “Classical Electrodynamics without the Lorentz
Condition: Extracting Energy from the Vacuum,” Physica Scripta, Vol.
61, 2000, p. 513 -517].
Quoting Evans et al:
Vacuum
charge and current appear phenomenologically in the Lehnert equations
but fundamentally in the O(3) Yang-Mills theory of classical
electrodynamics. The latter also allows for the possibility of the
existence of vacuum topological magnetic charge density and topological
magnetic current density. Both O(3) and Lehnert equations are superior
to the Maxwell-Heaviside equations in being able to describe phenomena
not amenable to the latter. In theory, devices can be made to extract
the energy associated with vacuum charge and current.”
Obviously,
from the cartels' view this intent by Tesla was totally unacceptable!
They thus began intensely suppressing Tesla, because "that fool is
intent on giving the world cheap clean electrical energy for free, and
one cannot put a power meter on that!” To the cartels, it was
unacceptable that electrical engineers should be taught that every
generator already outputs a mix of two EM energy flows, one very tiny
and usable (divergent) and the other incredibly enormous though
usually unusable (usually nondivergent and noninteracting).
Accordingly,
they apparently pressed Lorentz into service, to eliminate all those
asymmetrical systems that could not only exist in an active medium, but
could also receive and use excess energy from it. In 1892 Lorentz
arbitrarily symmetrized the already sharply truncated Heaviside vector
equations, thus removing the remaining and “offending” asymmetric
Maxwellian systems.
Of course, Lorentz simply borrowed that
work from his predecessor Ludwig Lorenz, but it was H.A. Lorentz who
received credit for it. Indeed, Lorentz apparently received credit for
the original work of several persons! [For a discussion of who got
credit for what, see J. D. Jackson L. B. Okun, "Historical roots of
gauge invariance," Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 73, July 2001, p.
663-680. Discusses roots and history of gauge invariance, verifies that
Ludwig Lorenz (without the “t”) first symmetrically regauged Maxwell's
equations, although it has been misattributed to H. A. Lorentz (with
the “t”) as being first. This is an excellent coverage of the history
of who did what and when, and who got credit for it.
In the
cartels' view back there in the 1880s and 1890s, electrical engineers
simply must not be taught that every generator already outputs more
than a trillion times as much EM energy flow as one inputs to it in
mechanical energy to crank the generator shaft! So they called again on
the services of their useful scientist Lorentz, who in 1892 had nicely
symmetrized Heaviside's equations for them, so as to arbitrarily
discard all asymmetrical Maxwellian systems from the theory -- the kind
of system Tesla was trying to build that would accept and extract
excess usable energy from the active medium, and thus could become
"self-powering" like a windmill-driven power system, a hydroelectric
power plant, or a solar cell array powered generating system.
To
get rid of the unacceptable Heaviside giant energy flow component as
desired by the cartels, Lorentz simply assumed a closed surface
surrounding every volume element of interest. He then
surface-integrated the entire energy flow vector (containing both the
giant curled nondiverging Heaviside energy flow component and the
feeble diverging Poynting energy flow component), around that closed
surface. This eliminates (totally discards) that nondivergent giant
Heaviside vector component (at least in any special relativistic
situation) and retains the divergent Poynting energy flow component
that enters the circuit and powers up the electrons.
Recall
that the energy flow “in” an EM circuit or system occurs in space
outside the conductors, not inside the wires, and it does not involve
electron current. The two components of energy flow – the diverged
Poynting energy flow component and the Heaviside curled and
nondivergent energy flow component – both flow through space outside
the wire, and normally only the Poynting component gets diverged into
the conductors to power the electrons.
Even in today’s better
textbooks, the Poynting energy flow is not the true flow of EM energy
through a representative unit area in space. Even Jackson points that
out (but does nothing about it). Quoting Jackson:
"...the
Poynting vector is arbitrary to the extent that the cưrl of any vector
field can be added to it. Such an added term can, however, have no
physical consequences. Hence it is customary to make the specific
choice …" [J. D. Jackson, Classical Electrodynamics, Second Edition,
Wiley, 1975, p. 237].
Note that Jackson uses precisely the
same argument (no physical significance) that Lorentz used, to justify
discarding any cưrled energy flow vector component.
Jackson's
statement is true only so long as the situation is special relativistic
(which is most of the time). In that case, the divergence of the cưrl
is zero and so Heaviside's curled flow component doesn’t diverge or
interact at all, and hence has "no consequence" at least with respect
to ordinary EM. But if the situation is made general relativistic, then
Jackson's statement is not valid. In that case, vector analysis fails
and the divergence of the cưrl can indeed be nonzero. So some of that
giant Heaviside curled energy flow component can be diverged and used.
The
"negative resonance absorption of the medium" (NRAM) process – used in
optical physics and proven experimentally since 1967 when the Russians
allowed Letokhov to release it – will indeed diverge some of that
excess but long ignored Heaviside energy flow component. Hence a
self-resonant charged medium, fed (optimized experiment) by an IR
laser, will output re-radiate 18 times as much IR energy as one
calculates is input to it (using Poynting energy flow component input
only).
Because the optical physicists know nothing about that
huge ever-present Heaviside curled energy flow component, they have no
notion as to where the excess input energy (required by the
conservation of energy law) could be coming from. Hence they say
"negative resonance absorption" instead of "excess resonance emission",
or they do not get their papers published! And they never speak of the
thermodynamics of the reaction; instead, they speak only of the "change
in the reaction cross section" of a self-resonant charge, compared to
the same charge when static.
... More here
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: Tom Bearden Website Update (Score: 1)
by Denyarvas on Wednesday, May 02, 2007 @ 06:59:41 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | Dear Tom, I enjoy reading from some of your books and additional post concerning other FE technologies but could you enlighten me and probably the rest of us on whatever happened to your "MEG" design. It's been quite some time now and your website seems to never update with new info concerning that project. Is there any insight on a release time for a real product or are you strictly in the "book" selling business now.
Denyarvas |
Re: Tom Bearden Website Update (Score: 1)
by Mar1 on Wednesday, May 02, 2007 @ 18:44:21 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | Indeed Denyarvas, Tom is going for the pennies of many instead of the millions of just a few, same objective, different strategy, take care man.
|
]
Re: Tom Bearden Website Update (Score: 1)
by nanotech on Friday, May 04, 2007 @ 08:13:37 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | Lt. Col T E Bearden is no charlatan, he is no con man. He is an honest, down to earth man who is very decent, and who has suffered and sacrificed alot in bringing some knowledge of the virtual state/aetheric energy to the human race. He is caring for his precious wife Doris and he himself has health problems but he remains strong and his statements are quite sound.
Instead of making personal attacks against the character of the man, take a look at his claims and the tremendous evidence that supports these claims. The fact is that the Broken Symmetry discovered by TD Lee and Yang and others, as well as various solid evidences of overunity, back up Tom Bearden and John Bedini's claims a millionfold.
Look into the work of Craig Bohren and his population inversion experiments using lasers, as well as the Patterson Fuel Cell, and so many more evidences. Look at the thousands of experiments proving beyond a shadow of a doubt the Aharanov/Bohm experiments, proving the existence of the quantum potentials, as well as the work of Feynman and others on this.
Tom is deceiving noone. Do I agree with absolutely everything he says? No. But is the core of his work true, based on observed evidence? Yes.
|
]
Re: Tom Bearden Website Update (Score: 1)
by Mar1 on Sunday, May 06, 2007 @ 18:48:48 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | Nanotech, if what you are saying is true, then Mr. Bearden has my most sincerest apologies. I know one should not respond based on assumptions and in this case I am guilty of this for I have not read or reviewed his work much less tried to assimilate his teachings, but unfortunately there are a lot of people out there deceiving other people by taking advantage of the current energy crisis trying to make money in unscrupulous manners. Once again, if my comment was grossly unfair to Mr. Bearden, I apologize, people who truly are on the forefront of alternative energy should be regarded in the highest of standards not insulted, but those who purposefully deceive deserve a lot more than mere condemnation.
|
]
Re: Tom Bearden Website Update (Score: 1)
by nanotech on Monday, May 07, 2007 @ 20:20:59 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | Thank you for your reply, Mar. Yes Tom Bearden and others have devoted much of their life's work to this field and to helping get it off the ground. But there is more work to be done. There is sadly alot of suppression, too.
Many of the fundamental facts have been independently discovered by others.
|
]
Re: Tom Bearden Website Update (Score: 1)
by Denyarvas on Wednesday, June 10, 2015 @ 14:48:53 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | | Well nanotech, here it is June of 2015, any news of "overunity" products stemming from Mr. Bearden's research.... |
]
|
|
|
|
