ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 135 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

Dark energy -- 10 years on
Posted on Saturday, December 01, 2007 @ 20:09:47 UTC by vlad

Science Three quarters of our universe is made up of some weird, gravitationally repulsive substance that was only discovered ten years ago – dark energy. This month in Physics World, Eric Linder and Saul Perlmutter, both at the University of California at Berkeley, reveal how little we know about dark energy and describe what advances in our knowledge of dark energy we can expect in the coming decade from a series of planned space missions.



Perlmutter was the leader of one of the two separate teams of astrophysicists who concluded, from watching distant supernovae, that the cosmic expansion was accelerating and not slowing under the influence of gravity, as was previously thought. The two teams' finding confirmed just how little we know about our universe.

The two teams' discovery has led to the creation of the "concordance model" of the universe, which states that 75 per cent of our universe is made up of dark energy, 21 per cent of dark matter, another substance we know little about, with only a remaining four per cent being made up of matter that we do understand. The most conventional explanation is that dark energy is some kind of "cosmological constant" that arises from empty space not being empty, but having an energy as elementary particles pop in and out of existence.

Since the first evidence for the accelerating universe was made public in early 1998, astrophysicists have provided further evidence to shore up the findings and advances in the measurement methods bode well for increasing our understanding in the future.

Galaxies and the cosmic background hold some significant clues. Equipment that can make a more robust comparison between galaxy patterns across the sky and investigate temperature fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background, helping trace the pattern of galaxy formation, is being made available. Methods for further observation of supernovae are expanding and improving too.

Eric Linder and Saul Perlmutter write, “The field of dark energy is very young and we may have a long and exciting period of exploration ahead before it matures.”

The December issue also includes reporting from Robert P Crease, historian at the Brookhaven National Laboratory, US, on the difficulty of deciding who should gain credit for the discovery of the accelerating universe and comment from Lawrence M Krauss, director of the Center for Education and Research in Cosmology and Astrophysics at Case Western Reserve University, US, on the possibility that we may never be able to tell if dark energy is a cosmological constant or something more exotic still.

Link: http://physicsworld.com

Source: Institute of Physics
Via: http://www.physorg.com/news115622697.html

 
Login
Nickname

Password

Security Code: Security Code
Type Security Code

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

Related Links
· More about Science
· News by vlad


Most read story about Science:
100 miles on 4 ounces of water?


Article Rating
Average Score: 0
Votes: 0

Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


"Dark energy -- 10 years on" | Login/Create an Account | 7 comments | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Einstein's Biggest Blunder? (Score: 1)
by vlad on Saturday, December 01, 2007 @ 21:26:09 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
Einstein's Biggest Blunder? Dark Energy May Be Consistent With Cosmological Constant

ScienceDaily (Nov. 28, 2007) — Einstein's self-proclaimed "biggest blunder" -- his postulation of a cosmological constant (a force that opposes gravity and keeps the universe from collapsing) -- may not be such a blunder after all, according to the research of an international team of scientists that includes two Texas A&M University researchers.

Full article: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/11/071127142128.htm [www.sciencedaily.com]



Re: Einstein's Biggest Blunder? (Score: 1)
by illuminaughty on Sunday, December 02, 2007 @ 01:55:47 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Saw this one, too: It's Energy of the Vacuum...

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/01/070116130456.htm [www.sciencedaily.com]



]


Re: Einstein's Biggest Blunder? (Score: 1)
by nanotech on Monday, December 03, 2007 @ 19:26:51 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
ONCE AGAIN TOM BEARDEN AND COLLEAGUES ARE PROVEN RIGHT! Back in the 1990s he wrote a thick paper to the New Energy Journal detailing how dark energy and dark  matter are vacuum/ether energy.




]


Re: Einstein's Biggest Blunder? (Score: 1)
by RBM on Wednesday, December 05, 2007 @ 15:28:26 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Has there been any further word regarding Mr. Bearden's health ?

I hope he is making progress with his health, just because. Besides nanotech's observation underscores Tom's valuable work in this field.


]


Re: Einstein's Biggest Blunder? (Score: 1)
by nanotech on Saturday, December 08, 2007 @ 09:13:59 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
Yes, and infact nanocrystalline substances interact with the virtual state vacuum field.

The shadow govt is freaking out on two fronts: Nanotech is inevitable now. The genie is out of the bottle. Once the people can mass assemble nanocrystalline materials at home or in local area, they get vacuum energy.





]


Study: Dark matter in newborn universe; Cosmological particle creation, etc. (Score: 1)
by vlad on Monday, December 03, 2007 @ 23:37:57 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
Study: Dark matter in newborn universe doused earliest stars

“Dark star crashes, pouring its light into ashes” – The Grateful Dead, 1967.
Perhaps the first stars in the newborn universe did not shine, but instead were invisible “dark stars” 400 to 200,000 times wider than the sun and powered by the annihilation of mysterious dark matter, a University of Utah study concludes.

Source: http://www.physorg.com/news115880789.html [www.physorg.com]

Radiation flashes may help crack cosmic mystery

Faint, fleeting blue flashes of radiation emitted by particles that travel faster than the speed of light through the atmosphere may help scientists solve one of the oldest mysteries in astrophysics.

Source: http://www.physorg.com/news115922439.html [www.physorg.com]

Analog of cosmological particle creation
By Miranda Marquit

“In cosmology there’s this quantum effect,” Ralf Schützhold tells PhysOrg.com. “In the universe, there is a ground state, where it is empty. But if the universe starts to expand or contract, the vacuum is distorted, no longer empty. Particles are created.”

Source: http://www.physorg.com/news115907018.html [www.physorg.com]




New Light on Dark Energy (Score: 1)
by vlad on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 @ 22:56:47 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com
Astronomers have used ESO’s Very Large Telescope to measure the distribution and motions of thousands of galaxies in the distant Universe. This opens fascinating perspectives to better understand what drives the acceleration of the cosmic expansion and sheds new light on the mysterious dark energy that is thought to permeate the Universe...

More: http://www.physorg.com/news120920183.html [www.physorg.com]



 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.