 |
There are currently, 205 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
GWE and General Motors
Posted on Monday, January 19, 2004 @ 19:38:27 UTC by vlad
|
|
Anonymous writes: Could the Chevrolet Division of General Motors be sending a subtle message that they are in on the Genesis World Energy technology?
The new 2004 Chevrolet advertising tagline logo "An American Revolution" has a similar "three-
horizontal-line-E" design to it, as does the Genesis World Energy Logo.
Is this too much of a reach...or...a subtle message to the world...a message that does not violate the GWE non-disclosure agreement?
The Chevy tagline logo can be found here...
www.chevrolet.com
GWE logo is here...
www.genesisworldenergy.org
Or go to this webpage to see both logos...
http://home.att.net/~mega35/index.html
mega35
|
| |
|
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
| |
Average Score: 2.16
Votes: 6
| |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: GWE and General Motors (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, January 19, 2004 @ 21:05:42 UTC | It would be really, really nice.
I still hope that GWE is legit and not a scam. Just because they are being investigated that does not really mean anything.
It would be nice to get an update from GWE. Because according to their time table they should be getting pretty far along by now.
|
Re: GWE and General Motors (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 06:42:50 UTC | I would think that they are not far along...I don't mean to sound pessimistic and i,m certainly not going to call them a scam. GWE has been pretty boisterous about reaching milestones and the fact that they haven't made any announcements lately can only mean that they are having problems or delays or something. I have been waiting for more details on on this news room item.
"New Technology Announcement Planned
Coming Soon... GWE will announce the availability of a new worldwide technology infrastructure that is intended to supply essential or preferred consumer services at a substantially reduced cost."
|
]
Re: GWE and General Motors (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 08:40:52 UTC | Well, it's a bit more than them "just being under investigation".
Unfortunately, it's been discovered that GWE's "devices" bare a remarkable resemblance to Hammacher Schlemmer's legit devies - which BTW, claim to offer performance that is drasitcally lower than that of GWE.
I'm really thinking GWE is full of shit.... :(
-Ryan
|
]
Re: GWE and General Motors (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 08:49:15 UTC | Whhops! I totally botched that link....
Here it goes again...
LINK
-Ryan |
]
GWE and Hammacher device (Score: 1)
by Rastahal on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 09:42:19 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://truthbells.com | Ryan,
Please keep in mind that the Genesis "device" that was compared to the Hammacher device in the article you mention was a very small "proof of concept" model - NOT the full size Edison device.
Though it's not at all clear what the company's intentions are, I still think it's too early to write them off as a scam...especially on this comparison of their small proof of concept "model" to the Hammacher device.
RH |
]
GWE and Hammacher device (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 13:32:32 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | Rasta -
The problem with GWE demonstrating the Hammacher device for investors is that they were led to believe that it was a GWE device. The purpose of the demonstration was to convince investors that GWE had this technology, and could build such devices. Really, they bought it mail order. |
]
Re: GWE and Hammacher device (Score: 1)
by Rastahal on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 14:14:44 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://truthbells.com | Chipotle...you have proof of this? Is it on your website? Show me the article or link that proves this, I promise to check it out. You talk as if it's a done deal, please back up your confident words with proof so that we can all clearly see this picture you paint of GWE.
Thanks,
RH |
]
GWE and Hammacher device (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 14:56:19 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | Hi Rasta.
The report about the Hammacher device is from Sterling's report about the NJ investigation. The person who reported this to NJ didn't put me into the loop (which is just as well) so I can't tell you more about it. If you want to talk to investors Rasta, they aren't hard to find. |
]
Re: GWE and Hammacher device (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 09:12:01 UTC | Hi Rastahal,
You give class to this website. It is nice to hear from a person who has an open mind. I agree with you I will wait and see.
By the way, I went to see the device that Hammacher and Schlemmer has and compared it with the picture of the GWE device on the net...not even close.
|
]
Re: GWE and General Motors (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, February 05, 2004 @ 10:43:15 UTC | | What's the latest news on the investigation? |
]
Re: GWE and General Motors (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, February 09, 2004 @ 05:30:27 UTC | | Turn out the lights.. the party is over.... |
]
Re: GWE and General Motors (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, February 09, 2004 @ 19:12:13 UTC | Cannot login? Anthony!!!!! Is it all a lie or are there reasons for the failure of potential liscencees to log onto the gwe exclusive web site and access the latest info and bulletins they post there......I cannot access my inbox!!!!! What is going on Anthony?!?!
Pickle do you know? ....PL |
]
GWE site connection issues (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Monday, February 09, 2004 @ 22:05:23 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | The main GWE site is up all the time. Sometimes I notice that the "contact us" is dead for up to a day. It's hard to read a lot into that. I would not be surprised if the authenticated portion of the site also goes down now and then.
It seems like a pretty smart move for them to keep all their news releases private now. It's important that the investors not understand that there are not yet any licensees. The licensees shouldn't understand that there are any investors. The general public should just mind its own business. Too much publicity has already bought them a criminal investigation in NJ and an attack chihuahua in California. They are about to start tripping over deadlines they set for themselves and they are going to have to concoct some pretty elaborate excuses. It was hard enough when they had to come up with excuses for the investors only.
|
]
Re: GWE site connection issues (Score: 1)
by AndyC (hotmail account andydcoles) on Tuesday, February 10, 2004 @ 21:32:57 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | It is amusing to see such a dose of skepticism about GWE. How could the Company have possibly been funded up to now but for investors? As to not meeting deadlines GWE may have imposed for themselves, how many Defense projects are delivered within time and cost? The latter are fully supported by the establishment, the former (ZPE) are evidently anything but.
Reading carefully though the information provided on GWE's web site, there are many clues as to how the Edison devices may work, and these appear to be scientifically plausible. If it is all a scam, it is certainly the most elaborate we have seen to date. On the other hand, if the prospective licensees will only be paying GWE via royalties for working (i.e. proven) technology, what have they to lose?
Two other attempts to commercialize "over unity" devices are well publicized on the Web, both from respected authorities. These are the Motionless Electromagnetic Generator lead by Dr. Thomas E. Bearden (www.cheniere.org), and a ZPE device by Stephen M. Greer M.D. (www.seaspower.com).
Lets all hope that at least one of these sees the light of day and is not "buried".
|
]
glad to amuse (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Tuesday, February 10, 2004 @ 22:46:24 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | I'm always happy to entertain. However, I have to admit that Death Cab for Cutie is much more amusing.
Yes, it does seem that the company would need investors if only to pay their PR bill. But they say they have no investors.
I'm waiting for GWE to trip over its next deadline to point out the last one it missed, but, the milestones it's missing are not just technical hurdles.
Bearden isn't a PhD anymore.
Greer doesn't have any ZPE devices. He thought that he might have found one, but hasn't been able to test it in his own lab because the inventor doesn't cooperate. The discussion on keeleynet is that people think Greer is dealing with a known confidence man who sometimes calls himself Steven Marks.
|
]
|
|
Re: GWE and General Motors (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, January 19, 2004 @ 22:25:59 UTC | | It's a REACH !! |
|
|
Re: GWE and General Motors (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, January 19, 2004 @ 22:26:24 UTC | | It's a REACH !! |
|
|
Re: GWE and General Motors (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 05:11:54 UTC | Its a REACH if I ever saw one.
The highlighted E in REVOLUTION is supposed to represent the word EVOLUTION.
To think that there is a connection between GM and GWE is wishfull thinking
|
Hey! The Mitsubishi logo... (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 22:58:56 UTC | bears a weak resemblance to the radioactive warning sign!! Do you think its a message that they are planning on incorporating nuclear reactors in their cars ??
-Gog
(sarcasm intended)
|
]
Re: Hey! The Mitsubishi logo... (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 @ 11:19:52 UTC | Its possible...I'll have to get my secrete decoder ring out of my Ovaltine so I can decrypt the code.
(More intended sarcasm) |
]
|
|
GWE Investor Relations in action (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 13:28:43 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | For those wondering why all the attention to how GM draws E's, this is material for the GWE investors. For about a year now, Pat Kelly has been telling the investors that he has an in with General Motors. Now he's trying to convince them that GM is writing an E funny to send them a secret coded message.
Was this story what he gave in lieu of that dividend he said had to be postponed till this year for tax reasons? |
Re: GWE Investor Relations in action (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 13:52:30 UTC | | OH thats BS....now you are reaching insanity...im a neutral party in this matter but that just sounds absolutely ridiculous. You are trying to say that patrick told the investors that the E in REVOLUTION is a secret code to them for reassurance!?!?!? And you say this as if you know this for a fact....what...did you get a hold of a secrete decoder ring??....Looney!!! |
]
]
Re: Yes this is insane (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 18:53:51 UTC | | You made that statement as if you know for a fact that Patrick was telling his investors that it was a code of some sort. You finally flew the coup. |
]
Patrick's stories through the urim and thummim (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 20:51:27 UTC | Let's get this straight. You think that it's perfectly reasonable to speculate that General Motors is using typography to send a secret message about GWE, but that it's crazy to say that the story comes from Patrick.
Hmm.
What would be nice is if you would list all the stories Patrick has given you about GM, and we can pick which one is the wackiest. |
]
Re: Patrick's stories through the urim and thummim (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 @ 05:16:53 UTC | absolutely not...to even think that there are secrete messages being placed in ad campaigns are insane...Chipootle is the one accusing Patrick or GWE of doind this...so you tell me who the insane one is. If Chipotle is going to make that claim then post the proof...if not then I will continue to believe that he is off his rocker.
I have not received any stories from patrick...im not involved just hopefull...but chipotles comment on secrete messages has really pushed this into the twilight zone.
Looney Chipotle...lets see the proof of your claims of GWE telling investors that the E is a secret message.
|
]
Re: Patrick's stories through the urim and thummim (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 @ 10:09:19 UTC | | Mormon references keep cropping up on these message boards. Can someone put me in the loop here? Is Kelly Mormon? |
]
Yes. (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 @ 11:20:56 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | | The Kelly is LDS, the investors "gentiles", mostly from outside the USA. The immigrants probably think a Mormon is some kind of strange Jew who eats pork but doesn't drink wine. So it's harder for them to understand how they are part of a pattern. |
]
Mega35, Rasta (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 @ 11:02:28 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | The article above was submitted by mega35, not me. Someone, maybe the same guy, first started mentioning this on this site on the 20th as a reply to this story. He also seems to think GWE was involved in Libya's (or does he really mean "Libia"?) efforts to get itself off the international blacklists. Now do you think it's more likely that mega35 is some fantasy prone person uninvolved with GWE who likes to write stories about them, or that he's throwing out PR? Seriously now.
Expect the GWE PR to get more wacky as they miss deadlines that they had set for themselves. They still say that they went into production on August 19, which makes no sense, since they have no customers and no revenue. Other deadlines, they are changing as they miss them.
Rasta - You ask why I don't update the website. It might be worthwile to document them changing deadlines in advance of them missing them, and I plan to write about that. But you are right that I haven't updated the site since summer. Partially, it's that the need's less pressing now than it was a year ago; the stock sales stopped last spring. But mostly, it's that I decided to stop publishing what the investors tell me. Back last winter and spring, I published a lot of information I got from the investors. But I started to worry that different investors were getting different stories, and I didn't want to out the leakers by reporting what they told me. The worst thing I could do is out someone who would be much more valuable leaking to NJ than they ever could leaking to me. When the NJ investigation started in the summer, I just stopped developing the investors as a source for the website. NJ is getting a lot more information than I ever could about the investment side of the story, and there is no point to me trying to help out there when NJ is doing the heavy lifting. I would love to understand the story better and to explain more of what I know, but it's really the investor's story, not mine, and NJ is going to help them more than I can.
I do finally have a solid line on Kelly that's not at all GWE related, so I hope to get some information there I can report. There is no risk of outing leakers, since the source (presumably) isn't involved in GWE. So no delicacy is required. |
]
Re: Mega35, Rasta (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 @ 11:26:51 UTC | Chipotle....the following came from your post.
"Now he's trying to convince them that GM is writing an E funny to send them a secret coded message."
You are the one accusing him of doing this..not Mega35. Do you have proof that patrick is trying to convince the investors that the "funny E" is a secrete code? |
]
Re: Mega35, Rasta (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 @ 18:40:36 UTC | "Now he's trying to convince them that GM is writing an E funny to send them a secret coded message.
Was this story what he gave in lieu of that dividend he said had to be postponed till this year for tax reasons? "
its funny how putting things in context makes more sense. I only just passed english at school, but it seems clear enough to me that none of this was offered as fact. |
]
Re: Mega35, Rasta (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 09:21:34 UTC | I have been following GWE since December of 2002
They started with the "E" that is in their logo.
GM just now started using it.
As also the pickle makes up another lie. Shame on you. |
]
Re: Mega35, Rasta (Score: 1)
by Rastahal on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 @ 16:54:49 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://truthbells.com | Chipotle,
Nice post, clearly written. Thanks for taking the time to reply. However, I think you could improve your standing in the eyes of many folks on this site (not that you care to do so) by providing some solid information that GWE is, in fact, up to no good. Then, we could all get off this Genesis merry-go-round and do something else with our time. So far, I'm not convinced but will consider anything you have to share.
Thanks,
RH |
]
Rasta (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Wednesday, January 21, 2004 @ 18:12:21 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | Hi. Rasta.
Frankly, I don't understand how you are able to suspend judgement in the face of the evidence you see. Maybe you could explain. You see GWE claim not to have investors, and you see the investors post here. Why do you suspend judgement that they're not talking straight about not having investors? You see GWE claim to be in production since August, yet register their company in September, and still have no licensees. Why suspend judgement that they aren't truthful about going into production in August? How do you make sense of that?
I am sure you understand that my own standing in the forum isn't a priority. I can't do anything that could make a witness unavailable to NJ. Also, the victims have been through enough. They got on the merry-go-round a year before you, and paid for the ride. I can't volounteer them for public scrutiny, even if they aren't important information sources for NJ. There are a lot of lessons that we could all learn if everyone explained how they got sucked into this, but we wont get their stories until later, if ever. And as spectators, we have no right to demand them.
|
]
Frankly speaking... (Score: 1)
by Rastahal on Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 10:48:40 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://truthbells.com | Hi, Chipotle
There are several reasons why I have chosen not to pass judgement on GWE, and just as you have information that you can't divulge that might help to prove your point, I too am privy to information that I am unable to share. Information that causes me consider other possibilities besides GWE being a scam.
RH |
]
Rasta, my questions were more specific (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 11:37:43 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | What I asked was what you thought about the investors and about the production claims. You see GWE claim not to have investors; you see investors post here; what do you make of that? You see them claim to have started production on August 19; you might remember some of the investors posting that they also had been told production started in Aug (a million by the end of the year); you also know they didn't even register their company till September and don't have any licensees or customers; what do you make of that?
|
]
My last post to this thread... (Score: 1)
by Rastahal on Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 14:57:48 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://truthbells.com | Chipotle,
My whole reason for jumping into this discussion was to correct your mis-statement at the beginning of this thread.
You said: "The problem with GWE demonstrating the Hammacher device for investors is that they were led to believe that it was a GWE device"
This is a plain mis-statement of the truth. GWE did not demonstrate the Hammacher device, they demonstrated a proof-of-concept model that supposedly LOOKED LIKE the Hammacher device. This is clearly pointed out (again) by another poster to this thread who went back and re-read the article in question.
On one hand, I can understand your eagerness to discuss your reported trail of bummed investors and state Attorneys General as evidence of a GWE scam. Let me offer another view.
I've been hanging out in Vlad's virtual backyard here for about a year now, and I have watched you mis-report the facts in the same way I point out above many times...bending the truth to influence others to see your point of view. Given your surety of GWE's "scamability" is that really necessary? As I've said before, it really does nothing to help your case.
You know, I would probably be eager to get into such a discussion of GWE scam/investor theories with someone who is open minded and willing to look at more than their own ideas and opinions...but you are not that person.
From the beginning, you have adopted the philosophy of "Shoot first...then shoot again" towards GWE. That's OK by me, and it seems like you are having some success convincing others with your subtle bending of the truth.
But it's just because of this well-documented
"virtual vigalante" posture you have taken against GWE that I consider having a deeper discussion with you about GWE "issues" irrelevant.
Why would I waste people's time and Vlad's bandwidth on such a hopeless cause? While I attempt to stay open to your point of view, the possibility of GWE being a scam, I have yet to see any evidence that you are open to anything but your own opinions.
I am quite content to keep my mind open about this subject while quietly waiting for the eventual outcome. I will continue to read your posts and to honestly consider what you have to say, but I will not enter into a discussion with you nor will I give any creedence to your close-minded way of thinking.
And if GWE is eventually proven to be a clever scam as you have so persistently claimed, I hope to learn about it from someone other than you.
I'm finished with this thread. See you on the next one....
Onward and Upward,
RH
|
]
This is too much spin Rasta (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 16:21:18 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | I'm trying to understand the distinction you are making between the GWE demoing the Hammacher device for investors or a device that "supposedly looked like" the Hammacher, and it just seems like marketing spin. Why "supposedly" looked like? The person who saw it, after seeing the Hammacher, thought that that is what GWE had shown them. (Technically, UFCT. This was probably before there even was a GWE.) Could the witness be incorrect? Certainly not incorrect enough that it doesn't even really look like the Hammacher. Why do you think the person who saw both is wrong?
Rasta, you have been unwilling to address the contradiction between the investor posts you have read and the denial that their are any investors (and several other contradictions). But everyone is different about what contradictions they can tolerate. This is why it's important to point out every problem with their story. Everyone has different areas where they are experts, different areas where they are idiots, and different ways at ariving at conclusions. Some people who were not bothered at all by the initial red flags dropped them in a heartbeat when they claimed that they were going to make a million units a day in 2004. They were willing to accept wierd science and messed up electronics, but put their foot down seeing the impossible logistics and marketing. Other people stuck with them through that but gave up on them over other strange requests in the license application process. Some people change their minds slowly as they see more and more empty promises and no substance. For some people, there will never be enough proof. Think about people who still think that Keely invnted a PMM 100 years ago or Denniss Lee dealers. I am patient. |
]
Re: Whats the Motive? (Score: 1)
by rycer on Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 20:32:34 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | | Chip, in all of this what is your goal? To convince people that ZP is not possible, or save a few who might lose some investment money? or maybe both... I happen to be one of the few who finds wierd science fascinating and messed up electronics intriqing if there is a hope that it may lead to a possible break through of thinking. Perhaps even in how we interpret the laws of thermodynamics. |
]
Whats the Motive? (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 22:05:12 UTC | | Science is fun, weird or not. There can even be times when it makes sense for people to invest money in ideas that have very low probability of working out. But GWE was represented to its investors as functioning technology. It's not. It's expected that investors lose money sometimes because ideas just don't pan out. But when people feel free to accept investments for ideas they know are wrong, then something bad has happened to society. |
]
Re: Whats the Motive? (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Thursday, January 22, 2004 @ 22:46:08 UTC | What is your proof that GWE does not have functioning technology? You seem so sure about it.
By the way..I suggest everyone go over to the GWE website and read it...Read the entire website..every page. It takes time.
Then think about how you would go about launching something that has as much global impact as the Edison Device.
One of the best lines I have read on this website regarding GWE is "security trumps revelation".
If...big IF...the GWE claims are as advertised...some half-cocked NJ investigation is
just chump change..of very little importance.
If I were a major player in the energy or automobile or manufacturing industries..I would be quietly following the GWE license procedure. The potential payoff is too big.... to "miss the boat" in this game would show stupidity...The downside is economically insignificant...being publicly associated with a potential scam being the most significant downside..
..and this could be easily "spun" into the catagory of the potential upside being so high.
Wait and see.
|
]
Re: Whats the Motive? (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Friday, January 23, 2004 @ 02:47:35 UTC | The fact is, some people have been "waiting" for the past three years now. Being impatient is one thing, but the tolerance level is starting to run out; if not already dry. Another fact is how every time people ask for any type of proof to gain (or re-gain?) any faith they have in this product, they do not get it.
I am wondering how much interest must have accrued from the investors' money by now. |
]
Re: Whats the Motive? (Score: 1)
by baldy on Saturday, January 24, 2004 @ 03:36:12 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | | Please post a response to this, showing evidence of an investment in a manufacturing co. that paid a dividend before they got their product to market. Have you folks forgotten it has only been thirteen months and eighteen days since GWE was announced in the the Idaho Statesman? |
]
Re: Whats the Motive? (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Saturday, January 24, 2004 @ 03:53:13 UTC | Baldy,
I'm not the poster that you requested a response from but as usual, you make good point. People tend to forget that to build plants, set up lines of production and distribution never mind the network of suppliers, etc. takes a considerable amount of time. Dividends cannot be paid until there is a stream of revenue and that isn't to occur until later this year. The investors, and others, who are crying about not seeing a dividend yet regardless of what they were told should step back and see the whole picture.
|
]
Didivdend nonsense (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Sunday, January 25, 2004 @ 07:34:28 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | Baldy, of course they can't pay. Tech startups don't pay dividends. But they have told their investors back in October that they were about to. Why do you think they did that? Now you posted in this article back at the time and I've sent you a link to this at least twice before and you've elected not to read it, but I'll try again. by Anonymous on Monday, October 13 @ 12:24:12 PDT
Anthony,
With GWE producing Edison Device components since August 19, 2003 and Device manufacturers beginning their production in early 2004, does GWE have any plans to do an offical media launch by the close of 2003? Or shortly after?
From previous responses, it appears the revenue stream has started from the technology license. Other than "really soon", when do you think the revenues will start trickling down to the shareholders?
Thanks.
[ Reply to This ]
Re: Anthony's Edison observations (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, October 13 @ 21:07:52 PDT
It’s my understanding that GWE has elected to let the licensed manufactures capture the lime light and will not pursue media coverage on its own.
As far as revenue stream matters go, I don’t have access to specific information on that. I was recently told that dividends may start being distributed before the end of the year, but it’s also my understanding that GWE wants to minimize income this year for tax purposes.
Anthony Marchetti
Emphasis added. |
]
This mental exercise... (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Sunday, January 25, 2004 @ 12:52:22 UTC | reminds me of levy-walks and levy-flights:
Levy walks are random processes with an underlying spatiotemporal coupling. This coupling penalizes long jumps, and therefore Levy walks give a proper stochastic description for a particle's motion with broad jump length distribution. We derive a generalized dynamical formulation for Levy walks in which the fractional equivalent of the material derivative occurs. Our approach will be useful for the dynamical formulation of Levy walks in an external force field or in phase space for which the description in terms of the continuous time random walk or its corresponding generalized master equation are less well suited.
http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0210373
http://www-math.mit.edu/18.366/lec/lecture12.pdf
http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Mathematics/18-366Random-Walks-and-DiffusionSpring2003/Calendar/
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=levy+walks&btnG=Google+Search
|
]
Re: My last post to this thread... (Score: 1)
by baldy on Saturday, January 24, 2004 @ 03:25:31 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | | I made this same resolve and I applaud your resolve. I had a private conversation on the member chatroom with this limp pickle and could only conclude he needed to go back to Junior college and take a philospophy 101 course and learn to reason to a conclusion rather than the reverse. He sent back that his minor was in Philo. I replied I felt bad for his Philo Prof. for he had been a total failure. I then asked this site to put a muzzle on some posters or an ignore button as on Yahoo. They wouldn't so I quit posting. I will read one like yours. I am glad to see someone else step forward and call it the way it is! Oops they need a spell and grammer check on this thing also. |
]
Re: Its Possible (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 13:54:02 UTC | I asked a friend of mine, who works for GM in the ME, and he said he had 'heard' about GWE, which means they could be working together..
He is mainly in sales support.. though |
]
Re: Its Possible (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 14:01:35 UTC | So it is possible that something is going on. I have no idea what sales support means..but maybe GM is providing cars or engines to test withthe HICEF. It may need to pass through their sales department(s).
Quite Possible |
]
Re: Its Possible (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 19:07:21 UTC | How did he hear of GWE? through the office or of his own findings?
This is important info.
|
]
Re: Its Possible (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 20, 2004 @ 21:49:16 UTC | I believe it was through the office, he said he had heard of them, and I took that to mean that it was something he had heard as part of his work, internal emails, new development, etc, etc
Now I'm not saying he had anything to do with GWE, just he had heard of them..
Maybe someone else working for GM can confirm.. |
]
Re: Its Possible (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, February 09, 2004 @ 19:14:16 UTC | | whatever |
]
Probably the uscar article (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Monday, February 09, 2004 @ 21:44:08 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | | The GWE April press release was covered in USCAR, which is geared to the auto industry. This is a pretty plausible vector for someone in GM to have heard about GWE. The guy who posted the comment about his buddy at GM, he said that his friend worked in sales support. Sales support people read trade rags. |
]
|
|
GWE and Kelly Search (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Monday, February 09, 2004 @ 22:28:12 UTC | Kelly Search
http://www.kellysearch.com/us-company-900903892.html
Product/Service Company
Worldwide ----------
United Kingdom
United States ----------
Africa
Australasia
Europe North America ----------
Australia
Canada
Ireland
Netherlands
New Zealand
South Africa
Kellysearch for Genesis World Energy
Telephone, fax and web
http://www.genesisworldenergy.org
Products and services
5 product / service areas
CNC Engineering or Machining More information
Engineering Services More information
Machining, CNC, Metal More information
Mechanical Components Design More information
Sheet Metal Patterning or Rigidizing Services or Suppliers
Mega35 |
Re: GWE and Kelly Search (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Tuesday, February 10, 2004 @ 05:58:59 UTC | | What does this mean? |
]
|
|
|
|
