ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 125 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Plagiarism in the Journal Nature (Score: 1)
by WGUGLINSKI on Thursday, August 16, 2012 @ 04:23:20 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message)
====================================
From: ian.fisk@worktech.com
To: wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: plagiarism in the journal Nature
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 22:56:53 +0000

Dear Wladimir,

 

Sorry to say that you are wrong. You have not cited any new experiments. You have cited a letter in Nature called “How atomic nuclei cluster” which does not contain any new experiments (it does cite recent experiments).

The letter presents the modern treatment of clusters of nucleons and traces the origin of the clustering (known about since the 1930’s) to the depth of the confining nuclear potential.

 

If you cannot realize the these are 2D graphs calculated from three dimensional theory and so are “flat” by definition, I am very sorry.

If you cannot be bothered to try to read the actual letter ( pre-print here [arxiv.org]), I am very sorry.

Figure 1 is

Plots of self-consistent ground-state densities of 20Ne, calculated with the nuclear energy density functionals: DD-ME2[23] (top), and Skyrme SLy4 [22, 30] (bottom). The densities (in units of fm􀀀3) are plotted in the x-z plane of

the intrinsic frame of reference that coincides with the principal axes of the nucleus, with z chosen as the symmetry axis. The inserts show the corresponding three-dimensional density plots and the density profiles along the symmetry axis, respectively.

 

Your book is (by your definition) plagiarism of Weizsacker and Wheeler: “The occurrence of molecular states in atomic nuclei and the formation of clusters of nucleons were already predicted in the 30's by von Weizsacker and Wheeler[1, 2].”.

 Martin Freer replied correctly to you.
Regards,
Ian
===================================







====================================
From: wladimirguglinski@hotmail.com
To: ian.fisk@worktech.com
Subject: RE: plagiarism in the journal Nature
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:17:41 -0300

Dear Ian,
in this article published by Martin Freer in 2010 we see that nuclei kept their SPHERICAL form, in spite of formed by clusters (see Figure 1):
file:///C:/GUGLINSKI%20-%202/NUCLEAR%20PHYSICS%20-%202012/Clusters%20in%20nuclei%20-%20Scholarpedia.htm
 
Now, in 2012, the experiments changed the image of the light nuclei: they are NOT SPHERICAL.
Figure 1 of the paper published in 2012 by Nature shows that the 20Ne (formed by 5 clusters) is FLAT:
 
1- three clusters are distributed along the zy-plane, and they form a circle with radius 8fm (a FLAT circle)
 
2- two clusters are distributed along a direction parallel to the x-axis, symmetrically with regard to the flat circle, with distances +2fm and -2fm
 
 
In the case of 16O, there is not the two additinoal clusters existing in the 20Ne, and so the oxygen nucleus 16O must be FLATTER than 20Ne.
 
 
In Quantum Ring Theory actually there are not clusters formed by 2He4.  There is only one central 2He4, surrounded by nucleons 1H2.
 
The experiments will show if my theory is correct (having a central 2He4), or not
 
So, instead of to waste my time with you, I preffer to wait the results of more new experiments.
 
regards
WLAD
===========================================





| Parent

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.