ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 300 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (June 24, 2026 - June 28, 2026) 2026 ESTC CONFERENCE

    • Hot Links
    Aetherometry
    American Antigravity
    Closeminded Science
    EarthTech
    ECW E-Cat World
    Innoplaza
    Integrity Research Institute
    New Energy Movement
    New Energy Times
    Panacea-BOCAF
    RexResearch
    Science Hobbyist
    T. Bearden Mirror Site
    USPTO
    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    E-Cat World
    NexusNewsfeed ZPE
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    EMediaPress
    Energy Science Forum
    Free_Energy FB Group
    The KeelyNet Blog
    OverUnity Research
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
    Vortex (old Interact)
    Magazine Sites
    Electrifying Times (FB)
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine

    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: (Score: 0)
    by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 11, 2003 @ 14:38:32 UTC
    "a convoluted attempt to interpret the above sentence."

    Your just seeing this now! This is evident in every one of JL's posts. Just bad interpretations.


    | Parent

    Mixing means and extremes (Score: 1)
    by chipotle_pickle on Friday, November 14, 2003 @ 09:47:46 UTC
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com
    The examples you come up with mix an extreme with a mean, the rated capacity of the device with what it actually produces. You twice divide a cost by a maximum to come up with an average (that would have to be a min) and assume they are doing the same thing. I would have been all over them if their calculations were as messed up as yours. What they do is take a $15 per month cost, divide it by (30 days/month * 26.6 kWh/day) to get 1.9 cents per kWh of *capacity*. Not 1.9 cents per kWh produced, since they never make any assumptions about what's actually produced. This calculation is correct enough; it's only wrong to compare that to a monthly electric bill without doing some time discounting. They could have been clearer that they meant it was the cost of capacity and probably shouldn't have called it "operational cost" but those are fine points it's unreasonable to complain about. That they got the $15 per month by using a 10 month year in their division is funny partially because it's the only real error on what was otherwise (except for the time discounting problem) a carefully spelled out page.

    Your water filters idea is especially off. If the water filters were supposed to be part of a per kWh of *production* cost, then they would have to be replaced not on an annual basis but on the basis of how much power was produced. (That makes more sense anyway.) But just say out loud, "The water filters cost 1.9 cents per kWh.".

    It's funny you would say I'm not an economist. Phillip Cagan once wrote me saying much the same thing, but he didn't need to make a bunch of math errors to drive his point home.


    | Parent

     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.