Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 178 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: Re: The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field (Score: 1) by FDT on Thursday, April 06, 2006 @ 19:45:17 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) Dear Koen,                To say that it is a magnetic polarization of the 'ether gas' is indeed a perfect way to look at it, except that I would have thought of the unpolarized state, more in terms of an amorphous liquid rather than a gas, and I reserve the word ether/aether for the more mysterious substance of the vacuum which exists between the electrons and positrons and probably causes the electrostatic force. I call the amorphous liquid 'The Electric Sea'.                Polarization of the electric sea between the plates of a capacitor is indeed a linear version of the same overall phenomenon. It doesn't mean that magnetism and polarization are the same thing, but they do overlap.                 One more important point. The vortices (electron positron dipoles) must all rotate in the same direction. That is fundamental for keeping in line with Maxwell's 1861 paper, and for maintaining the double helix pattern which is essential for supplying the axial tension in the magnetic field lines.                   On Tesla, I would like to get some references on his work, but I understand that alot of it is unavailable.                  Are you advocating an electron positron ether gas?                                             FDT | Parent Re: Re: The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field (Score: 1) by FDT on Saturday, April 08, 2006 @ 03:44:55 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) Dear Koen,                 Further to my reply of yesterday, I wish to once again emphasize the fact, that in the magnetized state, the dipoles will all be aligned along their axial planes, rotating in the same direction, and that the individual electrons and positrons within each dipole will be rotating in the same direction.                Your reasons for suggesting otherwise were that you think that they need to be rotating in opposite directions in order to maintain the 'ether current'.                I don't consider any such 'ether current' to be necessary for the purposes of a magnetic field. The only current which ever occurs in the electric sea (which you call the ether) is Maxwell's displacement current. The magnetic field is not based on any current within the actual electric sea. It is based on electrostatic tension within the solenoidal columns of dipoles.                          Yours sincerely                                   FDT | Parent

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.