|
There are currently, 160 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here
| |
| |
| The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
Re: FCC approval (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Sunday, April 27, 2003 @ 12:38:02 UTC | Won't this be the responsibility of the manufacturers? Considering they could potentially be manufacturing in different part of the world - each county having different requirements and regulations? |
| Parent |
|
Re: FCC approval (Score: 0) by Anonymous on Sunday, April 27, 2003 @ 16:00:19 UTC | Why would they need FCC approval? |
| Parent |
|
Underwriter's Lab, not FCC (Score: 1) by chipotle_pickle on Sunday, April 27, 2003 @ 18:47:19 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com | It's a good question. But they say clearly that it's the licensees job to get UL or other locally required certifications. |
| Parent- Re: Underwriter's Lab, not FCC by Anonymous on Sunday, April 27, 2003 @ 20:52:30 UTC
- Underwriter's Lab is darn tough by chipotle_pickle on Sunday, April 27, 2003 @ 21:44:18 UTC
- Re: What about the 12 auctioned devices by RedPill on Monday, April 28, 2003 @ 08:04:45 UTC
- Re: Underwriter's Lab is darn tough by Anonymous on Tuesday, April 29, 2003 @ 16:04:59 UTC
- Re: Underwriter's Lab is darn tough by RedPill on Tuesday, April 29, 2003 @ 16:55:02 UTC
- Re: Underwriter's Lab is not required by RedPill on Wednesday, April 30, 2003 @ 14:23:07 UTC
- Re: Underwriter's Lab is not required by test on Wednesday, April 30, 2003 @ 22:34:59 UTC
- Re: Underwriter's Lab is not required by test on Wednesday, April 30, 2003 @ 22:54:02 UTC
- Re: Underwriter's Lab is not required by Anonymous on Thursday, May 01, 2003 @ 10:04:08 UTC
- Re: Underwriter's Lab is not required by test on Thursday, May 01, 2003 @ 22:40:28 UTC
- Re: Underwriter's Lab is not required by Anonymous on Friday, May 02, 2003 @ 09:30:42 UTC
- Re: Underwriter's Lab is not required by test on Friday, May 02, 2003 @ 11:52:55 UTC
- Re: Underwriter's Lab is not required by Anonymous on Wednesday, May 07, 2003 @ 11:52:27 UTC
- Re: Underwriter's Lab is not required by test on Wednesday, May 07, 2003 @ 17:44:12 UTC
- Re: Underwriter's Lab is not required by Anonymous on Thursday, May 08, 2003 @ 09:57:51 UTC
- Re: Underwriter's Lab is not required by RedPill on Thursday, May 08, 2003 @ 10:27:41 UTC
- silly by chipotle_pickle on Thursday, May 08, 2003 @ 11:48:03 UTC
- Re: silly by RedPill on Thursday, May 08, 2003 @ 14:00:25 UTC
- Re: Patents and TM's by Anonymous on Tuesday, May 13, 2003 @ 09:08:32 UTC
- One GWE promise holds true - No UL testing by TilEulenspiegel on Sunday, July 17, 2005 @ 20:23:11 UTC
|
|
|
|