ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 151 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry

American Antigravity

Closeminded Science

EarthTech

ECW E-Cat World

Innoplaza

Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

Panacea-BOCAF

RexResearch

Science Hobbyist

T. Bearden Mirror Site

USPTO

Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: Re: Re: ZPE Interpretation (Score: 1)
by Koen on Saturday, November 04, 2006 @ 10:37:22 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://no.nl/tesla
"Koen's comments are not even minimally competent IMHO. They are not even wrong. In fact they are silly Red Herrings. Tesla has nothing to do with this. Also the EM potentials do not play the role he attributes to them.",

Just more word salad and silly red herrings by Jack.
Where are his arguments and reason?
Can he decide what role the EM potentials have, all by himself?

And why, all of a sudden, do we have to believe in "Shipov's tensor"?

Jack believes in tonloads of word salad and red herrings called "general relativity". This word salad theory was falsified by many experiments that prove beyond the shadow of doubt that the so called "nul results" of light speed measurements is shere nonsense. Yet Jack sticks to it. It is too much to ask for a physicist to drop AND QM AND GR,  and turn the so called classical physics into modern physics in an entirely different way. Jack dropped QM in fafour of Bohm's theory, but "Einstein's" GR still stands in his opinion (it was in fact Hilbert who formulated the tensor theory GR for the first time).

Jack is apparently not competent enough to understand that Tesla had a point of view based on many experiments; Tesla discovered wireless longitudinal electric waves among other things that are still denied by the "modern scientific" paradigm. He was not an arm chair physicist like Jack. Also Podkletnov rediscovered such waves during his 'superconducting discharge' experiment (I am totally convinced these waves have an electric field component). Tesla's waves are best explained by my theory, which involves indeed a rather classical scalar field directly expressed in terms of the EM potentials. This is better than an "order parameter" scalar field, or "Shipov's tensor" (talking about theoretical red herrings that are not even wrong); it is in the realm of verifiable experiments.

Each theory is "word salad and red herring" anyway. To throw this into someones face because of a difference of opinion is naive. Jack better eats his own red herring and word salads.


| Parent

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.