Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 134 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Re: Simple Math (Score: 1) by mlmitton on Tuesday, November 11, 2003 @ 02:26:37 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) JL, I'm not saying their cost numbers are reasonable. I'm only saying that there's no mistake in their mathematics, and they have no need to discuss finance charges at all. They say the cost of the device is (almost) $3,000, and operating costs are $15 per month. Finance charges have nothing to do with these claims. Just as they have nothing to do with a car manufacturer that says a car costs $20,000 and you will spend $50 per month on average on fuel and maintenance. The $3,000 figure has absolutely no relation to the $15 figure at all--in other words, the price of gasoline has nothing to do with the price of the car. The 10 month year, incredibly low finance rate, etc., don't make any sense because you're trying to tie together two The $15 dollar figure is not what it would cost to finance a $3,000 ED, nor does the page make any such claim. The 10 month year, incredibly low finance rate, etc., don't make any sense because you're trying to tie together two figures that have nothing to do with each other. (The calculations by the other people in this thread are equally irrelevant, as they also try to tie these figures together.) Maybe they're way off in their estimates, but there's certainly nothing inappropriate or unethical in anything on the GWE page. They need not include finance charges in the price of the device any more than a car manufacturer does. Maybe it doesn't include the cost of an inverter, but the walkie-talkies I just bought didn't include the cost of batteries, either. I have no problem with criticizing GWE, but the criticisms need to be valid. | Parent No operating charge. 3000/200 = 15. by chipotle_pickle on Tuesday, November 11, 2003 @ 09:41:57 UTC Re: No operating charge. 3000/200 = 15. by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 11, 2003 @ 12:06:41 UTC Water filters by chipotle_pickle on Tuesday, November 11, 2003 @ 12:35:22 UTC Re: Water filters by Anonymous on Wednesday, November 12, 2003 @ 13:20:31 UTC Batteries not included by chipotle_pickle on Tuesday, November 11, 2003 @ 09:46:39 UTC Re: Batteries not included by Technophile on Tuesday, November 11, 2003 @ 11:51:30 UTC Re: Batteries not included by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 11, 2003 @ 12:27:54 UTC Re: Batteries not included by Technophile on Wednesday, November 12, 2003 @ 09:08:00 UTC Re: Batteries not included by Anonymous on Wednesday, November 12, 2003 @ 14:36:57 UTC

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.