ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 141 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events

Hot Links
Aetherometry
American Antigravity
Closeminded Science
EarthTech
ECW E-Cat World
Innoplaza
Integrity Research Institute
New Energy Movement
New Energy Times
Panacea-BOCAF
RexResearch
Science Hobbyist
T. Bearden Mirror Site
USPTO
Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
AER_Network
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
EMediaPress
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
OverUnity Research
Sarfatti_Physics
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine

The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Mixing means and extremes (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Friday, November 14, 2003 @ 12:52:22 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com
Mixing means and extremes, or working with an unstated assumptions that the thing was running at capacity all the time is a much worse problem than neglecting discounting, constructing an improper "operational cost", or making an arithmetic error. I assume that their error is smaller than you do.

I can tell you still have not tried to say "The water filters cost 2 cents per kWh".

We know that they don't mean for the thing to be run at capacity all the time. In the questions about how long the gCell lasts they say that used heavily, they last half as long, since the "catalyst" gets used proportionally to the production. Also they suggest not averaging the unit at over 75% capacity. When they say that the capacity cost of a unit that produces 23.3 kWh/day is $2600, we don't know if they mean it will produce that much as a max, or an average with the device operating at an average of 75% capacity, or 50% capacity. We can't tell if a $2600 unit is supposed to be a 1kW unit, 1.5,kW, or 2 kW. It would be more transparent if they just measured power in kW rather than kWh/day, but then they wouldn't be them.


| Parent

average=max (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Friday, November 14, 2003 @ 14:14:05 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com
Zero variance is a pretty powerful assumption and you can clean up the confusion between operating and purchase price with it. So I can see how you might make it. But if you had been reading their site all along, you wouldn't. I am not going to provide links because I am still getting a lot of bad resolves but it's clear that they *don't* assume zero variance.

Q: How much electricity will the Edison Device deliver?
cut
Consumers should select a version of the Edison Device that allows them to meet their average kilowatt hours of consumption, with the Edison Device operating no more than 75% of maximum output.
cut

Q: How long will the chemicals in the Genesis gCell last?
A: The Genesis gCell provides a finite amount of energy. As a result, system life is proportional to the amount of energy each consumer uses. Presuming that the water system is serviced properly, the gCells in the Edison Device are projected to provide energy to an average home in the United States for up to twenty years. In a home where energy usage is twice that of the average, the gCells in the Edison device would last approximately ten years. Once depleted, gCells can be replaced by consumers for a fraction of the cost of an entire Edison Device.


| Parent

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.