Search

Create an account	Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10

	Mission Statement Modules · Home · Forum · LATEST COMMENTS · Special Sections · SUPPORT ZPEnergy · Advertising · AvantGo · Books · Downloads · Events · Feedback · Link to us · Private Messages · Search · Stories Archive · Submit News · Surveys · Top 10 · Topics · Web Links · Your Account Who's Online There are currently, 135 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online. You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here Events Hot Links Aetherometry American Antigravity Closeminded Science EarthTech ECW E-Cat World Innoplaza Integrity Research Institute New Energy Movement New Energy Times Panacea-BOCAF RexResearch Science Hobbyist T. Bearden Mirror Site USPTO Want to Know Other Info-Sources NE News Sites AER_Network E-Cat World NexusNewsfeed ZPE NE Discussion Groups Energetic Forum EMediaPress Energy Science Forum Free_Energy FB Group The KeelyNet Blog OverUnity Research Sarfatti_Physics Tesla Science Foundation (FB) Vortex (old Interact) Magazine Sites Electrifying Times (FB) ExtraOrdinary Technology IE Magazine New Energy Times Interesting Links		The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register Sorry (Score: 1) by chipotle_pickle on Friday, November 14, 2003 @ 15:35:30 UTC (User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com But an argument is more fun when you know that you might be wrong. So arguing with mmilton over weather GWE has made some specific arithmetic error has been amusing. But it seems to come down to a matter of agreeing that an error has been made, but disagreeing over what's the smallest error. That makes it an aesthetic discussion. Too bad. I was hoping mmilton would find I had made a real error. | Parent Re: ?? by Anonymous on Friday, November 14, 2003 @ 17:44:06 UTC Anthony by chipotle_pickle on Friday, November 14, 2003 @ 18:08:13 UTC Re: Anthony by Anonymous on Friday, November 14, 2003 @ 18:57:57 UTC Re:follow up question by Anonymous on Friday, November 14, 2003 @ 19:07:24 UTC good questions by chipotle_pickle on Saturday, November 15, 2003 @ 06:51:59 UTC Re: next by Anonymous on Saturday, November 15, 2003 @ 16:48:30 UTC Tougher question by chipotle_pickle on Sunday, November 16, 2003 @ 09:46:06 UTC Re: Tougher question by Anonymous on Sunday, November 16, 2003 @ 10:34:59 UTC Re: Follow up by Anonymous on Sunday, November 16, 2003 @ 17:47:45 UTC Easier said than done by chipotle_pickle on Monday, November 17, 2003 @ 07:08:33 UTC Re: silence by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 18, 2003 @ 17:36:51 UTC Re: silence by Anonymous on Wednesday, November 19, 2003 @ 06:08:34 UTC Re: silence by Anonymous on Thursday, November 20, 2003 @ 09:27:54 UTC Re: silence by Anonymous on Thursday, November 20, 2003 @ 11:38:15 UTC Re: silence by Anonymous on Friday, November 21, 2003 @ 10:27:28 UTC Re: silence by baldy on Friday, November 21, 2003 @ 11:22:37 UTC Re: Pickle? by Anonymous on Friday, November 21, 2003 @ 20:12:06 UTC This stock is wrong for you. Sell. by chipotle_pickle on Saturday, November 22, 2003 @ 10:00:18 UTC Re: silence by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 @ 14:55:00 UTC Re: silence by baldy on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 @ 15:28:29 UTC How do you keep missing when investors post? by chipotle_pickle on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 @ 16:40:02 UTC Re: How do you keep missing when investors post? by baldy on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 @ 17:34:27 UTC Yeah. by chipotle_pickle on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 @ 17:55:24 UTC Re: Yeah. by baldy on Tuesday, November 25, 2003 @ 18:35:43 UTC Re: Yeah. by Anonymous on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 @ 06:52:12 UTC Re: Yeah. by Anonymous on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 @ 08:55:10 UTC Re: Yeah. by baldy on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 @ 09:19:56 UTC UFCT not honoring agreement to buy back shares by chipotle_pickle on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 @ 09:28:35 UTC Re: UFCT not honoring agreement to buy back shares by baldy on Wednesday, November 26, 2003 @ 13:05:23 UTC To People Stating They Have Requested Buy Backs by Anonymous on Friday, November 28, 2003 @ 12:55:11 UTC Re: about time by Anonymous on Friday, November 28, 2003 @ 19:33:33 UTC Don't worry about lost opportunity by chipotle_pickle on Saturday, November 29, 2003 @ 09:03:10 UTC Re: Don't worry about lost opportunity by Anonymous on Saturday, November 29, 2003 @ 11:42:32 UTC Re: John's turn to come clean by Anonymous on Saturday, November 29, 2003 @ 11:47:40 UTC Re: John's turn to come clean by baldy on Saturday, November 29, 2003 @ 16:05:57 UTC Re: John's turn to come clean by Anonymous on Saturday, November 29, 2003 @ 16:22:37 UTC Re: John's turn to come clean by Anonymous on Monday, December 01, 2003 @ 07:48:04 UTC Re: John's turn to come clean by Anonymous on Monday, December 01, 2003 @ 09:16:09 UTC UFCT/GWE really does not want to return investot money. by Anonymous on Sunday, November 30, 2003 @ 08:24:06 UTC Re: UFCT/GWE really does not want to return investot money. by baldy on Sunday, November 30, 2003 @ 08:45:05 UTC Anon is the default by chipotle_pickle on Sunday, November 30, 2003 @ 11:29:15 UTC The scam angle not making sense by Rastahal on Sunday, November 30, 2003 @ 12:12:43 UTC Re: The scam angle not making sense by Anonymous on Sunday, November 30, 2003 @ 15:58:14 UTC Re: The scam angle not making sense by Anonymous on Sunday, November 30, 2003 @ 22:55:09 UTC Re: The scam angle not making sense by baldy on Monday, December 01, 2003 @ 07:54:49 UTC Re: The scam angle not making sense by Rastahal on Monday, December 01, 2003 @ 08:53:07 UTC Rasta, where is it not making sense? by chipotle_pickle on Monday, December 01, 2003 @ 11:17:28 UTC Re: Rasta, where is it not making sense? by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 02, 2003 @ 11:22:35 UTC Investors, these shares aren't even registered. by chipotle_pickle on Wednesday, December 03, 2003 @ 10:31:41 UTC use return reciept people by chipotle_pickle on Saturday, November 29, 2003 @ 08:29:53 UTC Anthony, why is this corp is not in good standing? by chipotle_pickle on Wednesday, December 03, 2003 @ 10:13:37 UTC Re: Anthony, why is this corp is not in good standing? by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 03, 2003 @ 13:41:41 UTC Re: the real question by Anonymous on Thursday, December 04, 2003 @ 19:04:50 UTC Re: the real question by vlad on Thursday, December 04, 2003 @ 20:41:26 UTC

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice. Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.