ZPEnergy.com - Dirac Sea

Alex Kaivarainen writes: Dear All,

My theory of overunity consider the both sign of Bivacuum energy: positive and negative, as the additional source of energy.

The forced resonant interaction of elementary particles, pulsing between the Corpuscular and Wave phase, with Bivacuum high frequency positive and negative Virtual Pressure Waves (VPW+/-) accelerate the particles and increase their kinetic energy, providing overunity effect:

http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0003001
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0207027

The excitation of high frequency VPW+/- can be stimulated by strong pulsing/alternating EM fields. The VPW+/- represent the density oscillation of positive and negative sub-quantum particles.
It is a consequence of Bivacuum dipoles transitions between the excited and ground states.

Neil Boyd is right, speaking about a huge role of sub-quantum in Nature.

My Bivacuum theory is the extended Dirac theory of vacuum.

Best wishes.
Alex Kaivarainen
www.karelia.ru/~alexk
================

-----Original Message-----
From: Doctor Whodini
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 6:43 PM
To: TAPTEN EMAIL GROUP; INTALEK EMAIL GROUP
Subject: [intalek] RE: [tapten] Mike sorry if my post was offensive,,, doctor_whodini Dirac Sea

I have two very good, but NOT perfect, papers posted on my website: http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Library/Library.htm

They're marked new. I've been carefully reading them myself and discovering a few errors made by Hotson.

Also, I have a FREE ENERGY - overunity device on my workbench, and its called the ZPOD. It operates on this principle of NEGATIVE energy - energy below the zero point. My last measuement down in Mesa a few weeks indicated between 110% to 120% excess energy. My method is crude, but effective, and is shown on page 6: http://intalek.com/Index/Projects/SmartPAK/Projects/ZPOD/head01.pdf

One could hem-and-howler all they want, but Dirac's Sea of Negative Energy is apparently the "correct" model, once all the imaginary components are placed back into his equations. This also includes relativity and I go into detail about this in my GMF paper (book). Once the imaginary components are included, everything starts to make sense, even at our macro scale. The simple electron is simply a "complex" particle, and the ZPOD is the evidence - I don't have a problem with that.

I suspect you'll have to back to school again and learn all about this stuff that originally appeared, then through what I call, "conspiracy of ignorance", was REMOVED. We should have had FREE ENERGY and Antigravity many many years ago! I shouldn't have to do this work.

So, you can say whatever you want, it is what it is. The proverbial "cat is out of the bag". Your precious bubble is busted... :-)

Bill Alek