
Primary objection to relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect
Date: Sunday, January 30, 2011 @ 15:12:48 UTC Topic: Science
From The Froarty Blog: The primary objection to a relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect and
catalytic action is that the equation for Casimir force at MINIMAL
cavity width provides results which would seem insufficient to manifest
the necessary time dilations to contract space time enough to
suddenly make the longer vacuum flux capable of fitting between the
interior walls of a Casimir cavity. The concept is akin to many SCIFI
story lines where the interior volume of a room can be many time larger
than the exterior volume.
The concept of a MINIMAL cavity width for Casimir plates is based on
plate geometry and the quantum accumulation of a field at some small
distance paralell to the plate surface. This limit has been established
by Liftshitz and others but is based on our 3D perspective outside the
cavity which my theory attempts to circumvent. I am positing that the 3D
perspective inside the cavity is changed by vacuum energy suppression
that results in a Lorentzian translation between space and time. The
mini hydrogen, hydrino, or other anomalous forms of condensed hydrogen
(take your pick) made famous in claims of excess heat would see the
walls of the cavity shrink but an observer on the cavity wall would
likewise see the hydrogen appear to shrink. This brings me to the crux
of this issue which is, how can the equivalent acceleration inside the
cavity be of such a large magnitude to achieve Lorentzian contraction
and sidestep these limits of MINIMAL width and plate proximity
constraints imposed by Liftshitz and others? A shortcut is needed that
ignores the need for spatial velocity and directly manipulates time. We
know that both acceleration and equivalent acceleration due to gravity
can result in time dilation. Therefore I assume a relationship between
vacuum energy density and time dilation. We see this in the twin paradox
because acceleration to fractional C can be replaced by a stationary
twin at the bottom of a High G gravity well such as a dead star through
equivalent acceleration. time dilation would still accumulate even
though both twins are spatially stationary...
Full article: http://froarty.scienceblog.com/32169/primary-objection-to-relativistic-interpretation-of-casimir-effect/
|
|