ZPEnergy.com - Gravity reduction effect?

Stefan Hartman writes: Hi Jacques, this sounds very interesting! Can you please send me more infos? What metals are you using in your tests? Do you have a JPEG picture of these metal alloy rods? How far away do you put these rods? Why is the effect stronger in iron pipes? How much weight was already reduced at maximum? A few Gramms? How long is the relaxation time after the pulse, until gravity is coming back? Thanks! Regards, Stefan.

--- In jlnlabs@yahoogroups.com, Marie Jacques wrote:

Dear All,

Some years ago, I tried very strong currents ( AC or CC ) in different conductors: 20 ----> 1000 / 1500 A.

I studied the ignored or voluntary forgotten Ampère's Force. It's the same thing that lifters but with strong current and very low voltage... Thrust and apparent weight loss too. Matter and Space around matter are stessed.

So, a simple scale set with a conductor and Hg contacts shows an apparent weight loss. For instance:
100 A --> dP ~ 200 mg / 300 mg
800 A --> dP ~ 1.5 /2.2 g
depending on AC or CC , the form and the nature of conductors. With nude coils or coils inside an iron tube the apparent weight loss strongly (some g).

Rotations, Translations are possible, I tried thoses one with success. Perhaps a very good thruster for the spatial vacuum. No ionization! No ions wind! Only a good and strongly space stress!

But the most interesting thing I have noticed is like said above the stress of the conductors matter ( Cu, Al, Fe, Tg, and Hg in a insulated and rigid tube, different alloys ) and the relaxation time

With very quick but strong current pulses, the matter reacts immediately but does not come back rapidly to the original weight.

So, I use this phenomenon for a series of different gravitic motors.

Can you imagine a squirrel cage? My motors are like it. Every bar is a conductor ( simple rod or coil of some wires with/without a thin iron tube around ). One end of all conductors is common with other ends. The other end of all conductors permits with electronic commutation his electric supply.

When one conductor during the rotation pass before the lower part, an electric contact is actived according to the following operations:

1/ The mechanical contact is detected by the variation of conductivity.
2/ The current supply gives a strong pulse (Capacitor discharge), it decreases quickly.
3/ The mechanical contact ceases.

This way, the contacts are not destroyed by sparks. It's electronics which commands the pulse but I have some problems with back emf because not adapted rectifiers (Too long recovery time).

As the conductors after the pulse recove more slowly their original weights, a dissymmetry appears in the "squirrel cage". With respect to a vertical plane passing by the rotation axis of the cage a side is always lighter than the other side and the cage turns slowly ( 0 --> .5 / 1 tr/" ). It's a running motor with a little motor torque : about 20 g.cm. But don't ask me if it's a O/U motor!

If the recovery time of the initial weight is very long with respect of the pulse width perhaps it's possible. The gravity operates more a long time after the pulse, it's free without energy supply. But if I know well the capacitor energy during discharge with the different stores of the supply, I'm not able to say what is the real part of energy which acts on the conductors, and I can't calculate the ratio between input energy and output energy for another reason too. In fact the motor turns not enough time because to commute 40 or 50 A is already an exploit without sparks from a capacitor discharge but often the big MOS Transistors are destroyed and the motor stops! The best I have obtained is a two minutes rotation. It's too short for torque measures.

Equally I know that a very strong pulse should be the best because the recovery time becomes very long. But the problem is not to furnish 1000 or 1500 A but the pulse commutation. The conductors are less inductive as possible but it's very difficult with those amperages and the come back emf is terrific!

So, I hope that I will be able to perfect my motors by choosing the good components. Soon you will find the motors tests on the S. Bernard's site (Moumra) and also a model of a new concept of atmospheric flying engine. With the Asymmetric Capacitors when the apparent weight loss is magnified by an other geometry (Multiple opposite AC for instance) the similarity is real. Gravific motors are realizable because there is also a recovery time of initial weight ( It's why a pulse supply is more efficient than a constant voltage and the period measures the relaxation ).

Best regards,

Jacques F. MARIE