Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

· Home
· Forum
· Special Sections
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 207 guest(s) and 0 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here


Hot Links

American Antigravity

AESOP Institute

Closeminded Science



Integrity Research Institute

New Energy Movement

New Energy Times

The Orion Proj.




Science Hobbyist

Tom Bearden's Page


Want to Know

Other Info-Sources
NE News Sites
Alternative Energy News
E-Cat World
NexusNewsfeed ZPE
FringeEnergy News
NE Discussion Groups
Energetic Forum
Energy21 YT Channel
Energy Science Forum
Free_Energy FB Group
The KeelyNet Blog
Tesla Science Foundation (FB)
Vortex (old Interact)
Magazine Sites
Electrifying Times (FB)
ExtraOrdinary Technology
IE Magazine
New Energy Times

Interesting Links

SciTech Daily Review
NEXUS Magazine
Find Jobs

Current Poll Results

What is the best model for bringing a real OU device to the people?

Discl., patent, $, res. theory, product (Bearden)5 %5 %5 % 5.52% (8)
$, no patent, product, secret parts, discl. (GWE)47 %47 %47 % 47.59% (69)
Disclose, raise $, patent, product (Greer)8 %8 %8 % 8.97% (13)
Patent, disclose, raise $, product (Lutec)6 %6 %6 % 6.90% (10)
Put plans in the public domain (Adams)28 %28 %28 % 28.28% (41)
Other (comment)2 %2 %2 % 2.76% (4)

Total Votes: 145

[ Voting Booth | Other Polls ]

Last 5 Surveys at ZPEnergy.com

 What FE tech will go commercial in 2017? (78 votes)

 What FE tech will win the FE race (0 votes)

 Release of FE techs will impact millions of jobs world-wide: (144 votes)

 The pursue of the idea of "free-energy" is: (103 votes)

 If you could support just one of them, which one would it be? (216 votes)

"What is the best model for bringing a real OU device to the people?" | Login/Create an Account | 15 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

prototype (Score: 1)
by chipotle_pickle on Wednesday, April 16, 2003 @ 12:40:28 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://freehydrogen.blogspot.com

None of the options included a step for building a working prototype.

1 - Build a prototype of an anomolous energy device
2 - Get someone else test it under NDA
3 - Pattent
4 - Promote
5 - Let someone else worry about the theory
6 - Raise funds (Sell stock, dealerships, or licenses)
7 - Sell products, kits, plans, or classes

Anyone who does not start at step one is not doing it right. GWE, D Lee, J Newman and the classic cons start at 6. 7 might get you thrown in jail. I don't understand why some people start at any of the other steps. Bearden goes straight into not following step 5 as if the rest did not matter. Greer starts at 4 then keeps going back.

Re: What is the best model for bringing a real OU device to (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 16, 2003 @ 12:51:42 GMT

If someone is convinced that they have a working OU device, the best way to ensure that the technology gets "out" is to do just that - FLOOD the internet with plans (easy to follow, where to get parts, and not be cryptic), be proactive in helping others reproduce the effects, and be forthcoming with answers to questions from the public! People WILL try and reproduce it - and if they're successful, the device will speak for itself. Make sure to put your real name on it though - that way if anything "happens" to you, everyone will know.

The worst thing you can do is keep it secret and try and patent it or sell it or attempt to get investors. That's when it will disappear. Every other model has this flaw. GET THE DAMN THING OUT! There's allot of smart people that will build one, if your device is real, and then it can never be surpressed. The info will be released amongst the public, and will be impossible to contain.

Why are these "inventors" so afraid of just putting it out there for free? They'll get credit for inventing it (if they put their name on it first) - most definately. That person would probably win the nobel prize, and be one of the most famous people in history. Isn't that enough? What is with all the secrecy??? After all we're working towards a common goal right? Let's work together on this, and bring it out for the world then!
And even if you don't get credit for it, because some rat bastard sticks his name on your plans, and happens to get into the spotlight before you, so fu*King what! The world will now have the technology! You can safely sue his ass afterwards :) (just make sure and document and DATE your research, that way there will be no doubt as to who invented it).

Just my .02


Re: What is the best model for bringing a real OU device to (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 16, 2003 @ 13:21:05 GMT

It seems the popular method is to disclose the plans and let everyone build their own OU devices. Why can't a company like GWE make money off of what they claim to have? Everyone has a motivation to discover the perfect OU device so why not benefiet from it and make money.

Re: What is the best model for bringing a real OU device to (Score: 1)
by Rob (rob@zpenergy.com) on Thursday, April 17, 2003 @ 15:17:15 GMT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com

If I had a device able to power a little scooter indefinitely I would do the following:
- 1. Sell the scooter as a new efficient kind of scooter with a very large, but software imposed range, say 100 miles? No talk of OU or anything.
- 2. When enough people have bought it, the website announces a "software upgrade to V2.0" which removes the software imposed range limit.

That would be very, very hard to suppress if a couple of thousand people have bought it...

- Gregory

Re: What is the best model for bringing a real OU device to (Score: 0)
by Anonymous on Friday, April 18, 2003 @ 13:03:13 GMT

I think the real question here is wether or not GWE has independent lab test. Their site states that licensees will receive independent test results as part of the package. now your calling them a scam because they are not publishing those test results to satisfy your skepticism. Do you have concret evidence that they do not have Independent lab tests.....No....you have no concrete evidence of any of your claims just speculation. Dosent matter anyway. From the latest news on the NDA's going out to accepted licensees we shall soon find the answers to end this debate. I personally have faith in the GWE group and im sure they have a revolutionary product.


All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.