T. Bearden's response to the NEM questionnaire
Dear
Steve,
Instead of filling out
the questionnaire constrained to a certain view, attached is a future article
still in draft, that I will probably be putting on my website in finished form
in the future.
The “energy from the
vacuum” problem is strictly due to what was deliberately done to the electrical
engineering model during its formation after Maxwell’s
death.
Unfortunately, most
persons in the “energy from the vacuum” area do not understand that the
conventional EE model, by assuming a flat spacetime and an inert vacuum, and by
describing only symmetrical systems, specifically prohibits the type systems the
inventors are unknowingly trying to build.
We have to learn to
build those deliberately discarded Maxwellian asymmetrical systems that Lorentz
arbitrarily excluded.
I hope that the
background of this problem and the specific “spelling it out” with necessary
references will be of use to you and your New Energy Movement
study.
It’s sad in a way.
Simply lay a charged capacitor or electret on a permanent magnet, so that the
E-field and B-field are orthogonal. Then by conventional Poynting EM energy flow
theory, that silly thing will sit there and freely pour out real, usable EM
energy – real observable photons – until the end of time if nothing disturbs or
changes it.
So there is absolutely
no problem in evoking a “free flow of usable real EM energy” – anywhere in the
universe. Every EM system already does it, in its source dipolarity’s broken
symmetry.
But by deliberately
designing and building only symmetrical systems, our engineers have always been
trained to only build systems that self-destroy their internal source of freely
flowing energy from the vacuum, faster than they can power their loads with some
of it.
Consequently, we
continually have to pay to crank the shaft of the generator, just to continue to
restore that source dipole – that we ourselves design all our power systems to
continually destroy. A huge revolution in physics occurred with the prediction
of broken symmetry by Lee and Yang (particularly in 1956) and its immediate
experimental proof by Wu and her colleagues in Feb. 1957. So revolutionary was
this discovery, that with unprecedented speed the Nobel Committee awarded Lee
and Yang the Nobel Prize the very same year, in Dec.
1957.
Yet in the 50 years
since then, the revolutionary ramifications of broken symmetry have not made it
across the university campus from the Physics Department to the Electrical
Engineering Department.
That is the major “new
energy” problem, still largely unrecognized even in the free energy movement
itself.
Anyway, I hope you find
the information of interest, and I also hope that the leadership of the New
Energy Movement can come to grips with this problem, and perhaps influence the
scientific community into correcting that sadly flawed old EE model. The known
errors in it have long been pointed out by eminent scientists such as Nobelist
Feynman and many others, but to no avail. A listing and small discussion of the
major falsities are given in the paper at http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/CEM%20Errors%20-%20final%20paper%20complete%20w%20longer%20abstract4.doc
. A National Science Foundation letter indicating their favorable formal review
is at http://www.cheniere.org/references/NSF%20letter%20Bearden.jpg
. Yet sadly, the folks at NSF that are in charge of the electrical power area,
communications, etc. have no intention of changing and correcting that old 1880s
CEM/EE model.
We really need the
scientific community to fund some sharp young doctoral candidates, post doctoral
scientists, and sharp physics/electrodynamics professors to thoroughly revise
the standard EE model now so seriously flawed. Once they are aware that
asymmetric Maxwellian systems are in Maxwell’s actual theory but have been
deliberately discarded, the sharp ones will proceed to solve the “free energy”
problem in a very short time, if simply permitted to work in the area without
their careers being destroyed.
Very best
wishes,
Tom
Bearden