One of the better and informative posts you made.

DTB

I realized that there is no such reliable information filtering source for news on ZPE applicational research based on the filtering principles I'm interested in (see Mission Statement and "Field correspondents wanted" post). The time somebody like me had to spend searching for every single really valuable and relevant information through ever increasing number and size of the sources, became prohibitive. Unfortunately, even though many think like me, few are willing to join forces to do something about it (only one offer for field correspondent so far, which is shock news to me given the thousands of apparently quality readers of this site).

Going back to MIT; don't get me wrong, I have a tremendous respect for scientists and especially good teachers. What I do not support is the attitude of those scientists who forgot a basic axiom of science, that "NO theory will remain valid forever" and consequently end up doing whatever it takes to maintain the current paradigm. Some resort to a blinding hostility against any of their own or even worst, outsider of the scientific establishment who challenges the dogma. This hostility unfortunately can lead to outright fraud, sometimes (I was reminded about the MIT paper on Cold Fusion, which basically killed it).

I don't expect to find in the MIT physics lectures debated theories like the one published in the latest number of the Infinite Energy Magazine #43 in the article "Dirac's Equation and the Sea of Negative Energy" by D.L. Hotson (which I strongly recommend everybody to read - it is probably very accessible if I understood almost all of it, with only an engineering background).
To conclude, there is no substitute in science for reading the literature, as Tom Bearden very well said. But my philosophy on the ZPE tapping devices business is this: theory or no theory if it works I accept it and use it. I'll give you just one example, from medicine, to see why everybody should have this philosophy. The Constraint-Induced (CI) Movement Therapy doesn't require surgery or drugs and could literally change the life of a stroke paralyzed patient in a matter of just a couple of weeks. Strangely, the research on which this therapy is based has been around for at least fifty years, but there was no accepted theory. Even now the theory is controversial and that's why very few heard about it. Fortunately some doctors finally embraced the same philosophy like me and many suffering people, who believed in them, are very happy now.
I want to make people happy too and I believe we can do it together.