ZPE_Logo
  
Search        
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Mission Statement

Modules
· Home
· Forum
· LATEST COMMENTS
· Special Sections
· SUPPORT ZPEnergy
· Advertising
· AvantGo
· Books
· Downloads
· Events
· Feedback
· Link to us
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

Who's Online
There are currently, 94 guest(s) and 1 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

Events
  • (July 7, 2017 - July 9, 2017) Energy Science & Technology Conference
  • (July 28, 2017 - July 29, 2017) COFE-9

  • Hot Links
    Aetherometry

    American Antigravity

    Chava Energy

    Closeminded Science

    EarthTech

    Energy Science

    Energy21

    Innoplaza

    Integrity Research Institute

    Interstellar Technologies

    JLN Labs

    KeelyNet

    New Energy Movement

    New Energy Times

    The Orion Proj.

    Panacea-BOCAF

    QVac_Eng

    RexResearch

    Science Hobbyist

    Tom Bearden's Page

    Unlimited electric energy

    USPTO

    Want to Know

    Other Info-Sources
    NE News Sites
    AER_Network
    Alternative Energy News
    KeelyNet_News
    NextEnergyNews
    PESWiki/News
    NE Discussion Groups
    Energetic Forum
    Energy2000
    Free_Energy
    Greenglow
    JLNLabs
    KeelyNet
    NuEnergy
    OverUnity
    Sarfatti_Physics
    Sweet-VTA
    Tapten
    Tomorrow-energy
    Vortex
    Magazine Sites
    Distributed Energy
    Electrifying Times
    ExtraOrdinary Technology
    IE Magazine
    New Energy Times

    Interesting Links

    Click Here for the DISCLOSURE PROJECT
    SciTech Daily Review
    NEXUS Magazine
    radioioAmbient

    Current Poll Results

    Which of the following is your favorite discussion group (see our list)?

    Energy20003 %3 %3 % 3.28% (2)
    Free_energy9 %9 %9 % 9.84% (6)
    Free-energy18 %18 %18 % 18.03% (11)
    Greenglow3 %3 %3 % 3.28% (2)
    Hydrino3 %3 %3 % 3.28% (2)
    JLNLabs24 %24 %24 % 24.59% (15)
    KeelyNet13 %13 %13 % 13.11% (8)
    Sarfatti Physics1 %1 %1 % 1.64% (1)
    Tapten0 %0 %0 % 0.00% (0)
    Vortex14 %14 %14 % 14.75% (9)
    Other (comment)8 %8 %8 % 8.20% (5)
    Do not follow any discussion list32 %32 %32 % 32.79% (20)

    Total Votes: 61


    [ Voting Booth | Other Polls ]

    Last 5 Surveys at ZPEnergy.com

     What FE tech will win the FE race (0 votes)

     Release of FE techs will impact millions of jobs world-wide: (143 votes)

     The pursue of the idea of "free-energy" is: (102 votes)

     If you could support just one of them, which one would it be? (216 votes)

     As a businessman, to put money in (FE tech), you would need: (658 votes)


    "Which of the following is your favorite discussion group (see our list)?" | Login/Create an Account | 3 comments
    The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

    No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

    Re: Which of the following is your favorite discussion group (Score: 1)
    by ElectroDynaCat on Friday, March 18, 2005 @ 13:07:56 EST
    (User Info | Send a Message)

    Jean-Louis Naudin deserves a great deal of recognition for actually doing the investigation of many claims, and that saves everyone a great deal of effort to concentrate on avenues of research that might prove useful. If we had to research out every crackpot idea in this field, we would be going nowhere. Lets hope that Jean-Louis hits the Big One some day, he deserves it!


    Re: Which of the following is your favorite discussion group (Score: 1)
    by Marv on Wednesday, March 23, 2005 @ 13:11:54 EST
    (User Info | Send a Message)

    The JL Naudin group to which I belong has apparently a lot of believers in OU devices. They have enough conviction of their own to get excited over the work and leave out arguing over engineering principles.
    This stems I think from JLN's own lab evidence. Anyone who hasn't seen his amazing work is missing the show entirely. I have always said, "All the discussion/arguing/position papers in the world do not hold a candle to a valid, documented experiment." How many others have E-published anything near JLN?
    Thanks to Mr. Naudin for some wonderful, expertly illustrated experimental data. Even if only one of his experimental tests had validity, it must be noted as the best OU/ZPE website besides ZPEnergy. Thank you JLN! Thanks ZPEnergy!


    What can we do? (Score: 1)
    by vlad on Saturday, March 26, 2005 @ 22:10:07 EST
    (User Info | Send a Message) http://www.zpenergy.com

    Dear friends,

    My idea was to find “correspondents” (two or more) for each of the most important discussion groups dealing with new/revolutionary energy topics (and related science) with focus on ZPE/vacuum/space/ambient energy research. This, of course, is in order to make sure that the interesting threads are not missed and are highlighted to our readers (the general public) by people who can filter the valuable information from the, let’s say, “ordinary traffic”.

    To tell you the truth, I wasn’t expecting a problem with finding correspondents, at least for the specific groups we list, assuming many of our patrons are regulars of those groups anyway. But I was wrong. Not a single serious offer since I put the ad on the main page! Even this survey is going very slow (people are not voting) and it is not encouraging. So far, from the few who voted, except for JLNLabs (expected) most people do not participate in any discussion group!? And those who do, obviously don’t feel like sharing any good stuff with others.

    For family reasons, my personal time to read the daily digests from these groups has shrunken considerably; I will have to rely only on what our readers are contributing in this regard (and it wasn’t that much in the past…ok… good posts on the topic we’re interested in are rare, I agree). Let me know if you have any good ideas to ensure we have the most important discussion groups checked. Otherwise, I’ll remove the ad from the main page and hope people will remember that this site was designed for all of us to help each other stay informed and keep up the hope for a clean and abundant energy future to benefit all life on Earth. But, if people don’t care, why should I?

    Vlad


     

    All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2002-2016 by ZPEnergy. Disclaimer: No content, on or affiliated with ZPEnergy should be construed as or relied upon as investment advice. While every effort is made to ensure that the information contained on ZPEnergy is correct, the operators of ZPEnergy make no warranties as to its accuracy. In all respects visitors should seek independent verification and investment advice.
    Keywords: ZPE, ZPF, Zero Point Energy, Zero Point Fluctuations, ZPEnergy, New Energy Technology, Small Scale Implementation, Energy Storage Technology, Space-Energy, Space Energy, Natural Potential, Investors, Investing, Vacuum Energy, Electromagnetic, Over Unity, Overunity, Over-Unity, Free Energy, Free-Energy, Ether, Aether, Cold Fusion, Cold-Fusion, Fuel Cell, Quantum Mechanics, Van der Waals, Casimir, Advanced Physics, Vibrations, Advanced Energy Conversion, Rotational Magnetics, Vortex Mechanics, Rotational Electromagnetics, Earth Electromagnetics, Gyroscopes, Gyroscopic Effects

    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.